Evaluating the impact of an enhanced recovery programme on the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-10) after elective Caesarean section in a South African public hospital: a prospective before–after study

Jan A. van Niekerk , Thomas Kleyenstuber , Zainub Jooma
{"title":"Evaluating the impact of an enhanced recovery programme on the Obstetric Quality-of-Recovery score (ObsQoR-10) after elective Caesarean section in a South African public hospital: a prospective before–after study","authors":"Jan A. van Niekerk ,&nbsp;Thomas Kleyenstuber ,&nbsp;Zainub Jooma","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Caesarean section is a common surgical procedure, accounting for almost a third of all surgical procedures in low- middle-income countries. Enhanced recovery after Caesarean section (ERAC) programmes are rarely implemented in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated a tailored enhanced recovery programme's impact on quality of recovery after elective Caesarean section in a Johannesburg public hospital.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a prospective, observational, before–after cohort study. Fifty-two patients (aged ≥18 yr) undergoing elective Caesarean section were analysed, comprising a pre-ERAC cohort (<em>n</em>=25), analysed from 8 to 22 April 2024 and a post-ERAC cohort (<em>n</em>=27), analysed from 3 to13 June 2024. The primary outcome was postpartum recovery measured by the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 score.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There was a significant improvement in Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 scores post-ERAC, with a difference in medians of 9 between cohorts (95% confidence interval: 6–14; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). There was also a significant reduction in opioid consumption with a median decrease of 10 mg oral morphine equivalent in the post-ERAC cohort in the first 24 h after operation (95% confidence interval: −26 to 6; <em>P</em>&lt;0.001). Time to urinary catheter removal, time to first oral intake, time to first mobilisation, and preoperative fasting for liquids all showed significant improvement in the post-ERAC cohort. There was no difference in length of stay and other secondary outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study demonstrates that ERAC implementation in a resource-limited setting is feasible and can enhance maternal recovery after elective Caesarean section. These findings highlight the potential for ERAC programs to significantly improve patient-centred outcomes in low-middle income countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11787429/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624001230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Caesarean section is a common surgical procedure, accounting for almost a third of all surgical procedures in low- middle-income countries. Enhanced recovery after Caesarean section (ERAC) programmes are rarely implemented in resource-limited settings. This study evaluated a tailored enhanced recovery programme's impact on quality of recovery after elective Caesarean section in a Johannesburg public hospital.

Methods

This was a prospective, observational, before–after cohort study. Fifty-two patients (aged ≥18 yr) undergoing elective Caesarean section were analysed, comprising a pre-ERAC cohort (n=25), analysed from 8 to 22 April 2024 and a post-ERAC cohort (n=27), analysed from 3 to13 June 2024. The primary outcome was postpartum recovery measured by the Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 score.

Results

There was a significant improvement in Obstetric Quality of Recovery-10 scores post-ERAC, with a difference in medians of 9 between cohorts (95% confidence interval: 6–14; P<0.001). There was also a significant reduction in opioid consumption with a median decrease of 10 mg oral morphine equivalent in the post-ERAC cohort in the first 24 h after operation (95% confidence interval: −26 to 6; P<0.001). Time to urinary catheter removal, time to first oral intake, time to first mobilisation, and preoperative fasting for liquids all showed significant improvement in the post-ERAC cohort. There was no difference in length of stay and other secondary outcomes.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that ERAC implementation in a resource-limited setting is feasible and can enhance maternal recovery after elective Caesarean section. These findings highlight the potential for ERAC programs to significantly improve patient-centred outcomes in low-middle income countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Frameworks for the design and reporting of anaesthesia interventions in perioperative clinical trials Peripherally inserted central catheters versus implanted port catheters in patients with breast cancer: a post hoc analysis of the PICCPORT randomised controlled trial Barriers and enablers to recruiting participants within paediatric perioperative and anaesthetic settings: lessons learned from a trial of melatonin versus midazolam in the premedication of anxious children (the MAGIC trial) The concerted actions of microRNA-29a and interferon-β modulate complete Freund's adjuvant-induced inflammatory pain by regulating the expression of type 1 interferon receptor, interferon-stimulated gene 15, and p-extracellular signal-regulated kinase Development of a key performance indicator set for perioperative red blood cell transfusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1