Aligning Medications With What Matters Most: Conversations Between Pharmacists, People With Dementia, and Care Partners.

Ariel R Green, Rosalphie Quiles Rosado, Andrea E Daddato, Aleks Wec, Kathy Gleason, Tobie Taylor McPhail, Jessica Merrey, Linda Weffald, Meghan Swarthout, Scott Feeser, Cynthia M Boyd, Jennifer L Wolff, Marcela D Blinka, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Rebecca S Boxer
{"title":"Aligning Medications With What Matters Most: Conversations Between Pharmacists, People With Dementia, and Care Partners.","authors":"Ariel R Green, Rosalphie Quiles Rosado, Andrea E Daddato, Aleks Wec, Kathy Gleason, Tobie Taylor McPhail, Jessica Merrey, Linda Weffald, Meghan Swarthout, Scott Feeser, Cynthia M Boyd, Jennifer L Wolff, Marcela D Blinka, Elizabeth A Bayliss, Rebecca S Boxer","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Successful deprescribing for people with dementia (PWD) depends on communication about medication-related priorities between PWD, care partners and clinicians. The objective of this study was to gain in-depth knowledge of how elicitation of PWD and care partner medication-related priorities during a deprescribing intervention shaped discussions with pharmacists about medications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative analysis of audio-recorded interactions between pharmacists and patient-care partner dyads in a pilot study of a pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention for PWD in primary care. Patients ≥ 65 years taking ≥ 7 medications and care partners were recruited from an integrated delivery system in Colorado and a community-based medical practice in Maryland. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze 82 transcripts from encounters with 55 patient-care partner dyads.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean (SD) age of PWD was 81 (8.1) years; 45% were women, 33% Black, and 15% Hispanic. PWD took an average of 13 (±5.3) medications at baseline. Care partners were on average 66 (13) years of age and most were spouses/partners of the PWD. Content analysis identified five themes: (1) Reducing medication-related treatment burden; (2) Alleviating burdensome symptoms; (3) Maintaining cognition and function; (4) Discussion of tradeoffs; (5) Challenges to deprescribing. After eliciting patient and care partner priorities, pharmacists recommended both deprescribing and prescribing.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings from this secondary analysis of a pilot deprescribing intervention suggest eliciting medication-related priorities of PWD and care partners can support goal-concordant care. These results can inform development of interventions to optimize medications for this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19379","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Successful deprescribing for people with dementia (PWD) depends on communication about medication-related priorities between PWD, care partners and clinicians. The objective of this study was to gain in-depth knowledge of how elicitation of PWD and care partner medication-related priorities during a deprescribing intervention shaped discussions with pharmacists about medications.

Methods: Qualitative analysis of audio-recorded interactions between pharmacists and patient-care partner dyads in a pilot study of a pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention for PWD in primary care. Patients ≥ 65 years taking ≥ 7 medications and care partners were recruited from an integrated delivery system in Colorado and a community-based medical practice in Maryland. Qualitative content analysis was used to analyze 82 transcripts from encounters with 55 patient-care partner dyads.

Results: The mean (SD) age of PWD was 81 (8.1) years; 45% were women, 33% Black, and 15% Hispanic. PWD took an average of 13 (±5.3) medications at baseline. Care partners were on average 66 (13) years of age and most were spouses/partners of the PWD. Content analysis identified five themes: (1) Reducing medication-related treatment burden; (2) Alleviating burdensome symptoms; (3) Maintaining cognition and function; (4) Discussion of tradeoffs; (5) Challenges to deprescribing. After eliciting patient and care partner priorities, pharmacists recommended both deprescribing and prescribing.

Conclusion: Findings from this secondary analysis of a pilot deprescribing intervention suggest eliciting medication-related priorities of PWD and care partners can support goal-concordant care. These results can inform development of interventions to optimize medications for this population.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍:
期刊最新文献
Application of an Electronic Frailty Index to Identify High-Risk Older Adults Using Electronic Health Record Data. Cancer and Accelerated Aging Research at the National Institutes of Health, 2013-2023: A Grant Portfolio Analysis. Home-Based Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment for Community-Dwelling, At-Risk, Frail Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Individualized Net Benefit of Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in SPRINT. Inspiring Undergraduate Student Training in Alzheimer's Research (USTAR): Training the Next Generation of Aging Scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1