Lisa Gallicchio, Rachelle Brick, Gina Tesauro, Lindsey Page, Paige Green, Jennifer L Guida
{"title":"Cancer and Accelerated Aging Research at the National Institutes of Health, 2013-2023: A Grant Portfolio Analysis.","authors":"Lisa Gallicchio, Rachelle Brick, Gina Tesauro, Lindsey Page, Paige Green, Jennifer L Guida","doi":"10.1111/jgs.19414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of the NIH-funded grant portfolio focused on cancer and accelerated aging.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Research project grants focused on cancer survivors and aging trajectories that were newly funded during fiscal years 2013 through 2023 were identified by first using a text mining algorithm from the NIH Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization (RCDC) system with cancer survivorship-relevant terms and then a list of aging-related terms that included aging, neurocognition, and physical function. Included grants were double coded to extract study characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 grants were identified, with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and National Institute on Aging (NIA) funding 62.0% and 23.5% of the grants, respectively. The number of newly funded grants rose from nine in 2013 to 27 in 2023. Overall, the majority were observational studies (65.1%); 45% included study samples of multiple cancer types. The most commonly examined outcomes were cognitive (54.4%) or physical (37.5%) functioning; 30% of grants incorporated an aging-related biomarker. Few grants focused on racial and ethnic minority (3.0%) or rural cancer survivors (2.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This portfolio analysis showed an increase in the number of NIH-funded grants focused on cancer survivors and accelerated aging, but notable gaps are evident. Given the rapidly growing survivor population, many of whom will experience accelerated aging trajectories, there is a critical need to better understand accelerated aging phenotypes and mechanisms, so that those at the highest risk for adverse aging-related effects can be identified and interventions developed.</p>","PeriodicalId":94112,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Geriatrics Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.19414","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to describe the characteristics of the NIH-funded grant portfolio focused on cancer and accelerated aging.
Methods: Research project grants focused on cancer survivors and aging trajectories that were newly funded during fiscal years 2013 through 2023 were identified by first using a text mining algorithm from the NIH Research, Condition, and Disease Categorization (RCDC) system with cancer survivorship-relevant terms and then a list of aging-related terms that included aging, neurocognition, and physical function. Included grants were double coded to extract study characteristics.
Results: A total of 166 grants were identified, with the National Cancer Institute (NCI) and National Institute on Aging (NIA) funding 62.0% and 23.5% of the grants, respectively. The number of newly funded grants rose from nine in 2013 to 27 in 2023. Overall, the majority were observational studies (65.1%); 45% included study samples of multiple cancer types. The most commonly examined outcomes were cognitive (54.4%) or physical (37.5%) functioning; 30% of grants incorporated an aging-related biomarker. Few grants focused on racial and ethnic minority (3.0%) or rural cancer survivors (2.4%).
Conclusions: This portfolio analysis showed an increase in the number of NIH-funded grants focused on cancer survivors and accelerated aging, but notable gaps are evident. Given the rapidly growing survivor population, many of whom will experience accelerated aging trajectories, there is a critical need to better understand accelerated aging phenotypes and mechanisms, so that those at the highest risk for adverse aging-related effects can be identified and interventions developed.