Scale to predict risk for refractory septic shock based on a hybrid approach using machine learning and regression modeling.

Sejin Heo, Daun Jeong, Minyoung Choi, Inkyu Kim, Minha Kim, Ye Rim Lee, Byuk Sung Ko, Seung Mok Ryoo, Eunah Han, Hyunglan Chang, Chang June Yune, Hui Jai Lee, Gil Joon Suh, Sung-Hyuk Choi, Sung Phil Chung, Tae Ho Lim, Won Young Kim, Kyuseok Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Jong Eun Park, Gun Tak Lee, Tae Gun Shin
{"title":"Scale to predict risk for refractory septic shock based on a hybrid approach using machine learning and regression modeling.","authors":"Sejin Heo, Daun Jeong, Minyoung Choi, Inkyu Kim, Minha Kim, Ye Rim Lee, Byuk Sung Ko, Seung Mok Ryoo, Eunah Han, Hyunglan Chang, Chang June Yune, Hui Jai Lee, Gil Joon Suh, Sung-Hyuk Choi, Sung Phil Chung, Tae Ho Lim, Won Young Kim, Kyuseok Kim, Sung Yeon Hwang, Jong Eun Park, Gun Tak Lee, Tae Gun Shin","doi":"10.55633/s3me/108.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop a scale to predict refractory septic shock (SS) based on clinical variables recorded during initial evaluations of patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Multicenter retrospective study of data for patients with suspected infection registered in the Marketplace for Medical Information in Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV). These data were used for the development and internal validation of the refractory SS scale (RSSS). For external validation, we used retrospective data for 2 cohorts: 1) patients diagnosed with SS in an emergency department (ED cohort) whose data were registered in a Korean SS registry, and 2) patients diagnosed with SS in 6 hospital intensive care units (ICU cohort). A machine-learning automatic clinical scoring system (AutoScore) was used in the development phase. The performance of the RSSS in the validation cohorts was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for each. The primary outcome was the development of refractory SS within 24 hours of ICU admission. Refractory SS was defined by the need for a norepinephrine-equivalent dose greater than 0.5 µg/kg/min.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We collected data for 29 618 patients from the MIMIC-IV registry, 3113 patients for the ED cohort, and 1015 for the ICU cohort. The RSSS had 6 predictors: serum lactate level, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, arterial pH, and leukocyte count. The scale's AUROCs were as follows: 0.873 (95% CI, 0.846-0.900) in the internal validation, 0.705 (95% CI, 0.678-0.733) in the ED cohort on arrival, 0.781 (95% CI, 0.757-0.805) in the ED cohort at the moment of diagnosing hypoperfusion or hypotension, and 0.822 (95% CI, 0.787-0.857) in the ICU cohort. Calibration was acceptable in all the cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RSSS had adequate diagnostic accuracy in multiple cohorts of patients diagnosed in the ED and ICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":93987,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":"37 1","pages":"15-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55633/s3me/108.2024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop a scale to predict refractory septic shock (SS) based on clinical variables recorded during initial evaluations of patients.

Methods: Multicenter retrospective study of data for patients with suspected infection registered in the Marketplace for Medical Information in Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV). These data were used for the development and internal validation of the refractory SS scale (RSSS). For external validation, we used retrospective data for 2 cohorts: 1) patients diagnosed with SS in an emergency department (ED cohort) whose data were registered in a Korean SS registry, and 2) patients diagnosed with SS in 6 hospital intensive care units (ICU cohort). A machine-learning automatic clinical scoring system (AutoScore) was used in the development phase. The performance of the RSSS in the validation cohorts was assessed with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for each. The primary outcome was the development of refractory SS within 24 hours of ICU admission. Refractory SS was defined by the need for a norepinephrine-equivalent dose greater than 0.5 µg/kg/min.

Results: We collected data for 29 618 patients from the MIMIC-IV registry, 3113 patients for the ED cohort, and 1015 for the ICU cohort. The RSSS had 6 predictors: serum lactate level, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, temperature, arterial pH, and leukocyte count. The scale's AUROCs were as follows: 0.873 (95% CI, 0.846-0.900) in the internal validation, 0.705 (95% CI, 0.678-0.733) in the ED cohort on arrival, 0.781 (95% CI, 0.757-0.805) in the ED cohort at the moment of diagnosing hypoperfusion or hypotension, and 0.822 (95% CI, 0.787-0.857) in the ICU cohort. Calibration was acceptable in all the cohorts.

Conclusions: The RSSS had adequate diagnostic accuracy in multiple cohorts of patients diagnosed in the ED and ICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alkalosis during emergency department evaluation of acute heart failure: Is there an association with mortality? Artificial intelligence and machine learning systems: fascination vs reality. Artificial intelligence as a diagnostic support tool in emergency departments. Authors' reply. Authors' reply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1