Appropriate Injection Intervals of Dupilumab in Patients With Adult Atopic Dermatitis: A Step Toward Developing Guidelines for Daily Practice.

IF 1.3 Annals of dermatology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.5021/ad.24.084
Heeyeon Kim, Sejin Oh, Hyungrye Noh, Byeonghyun Joo, Joonho Shim, Jihye Park, Dongyoun Lee, Jong Hee Lee
{"title":"Appropriate Injection Intervals of Dupilumab in Patients With Adult Atopic Dermatitis: A Step Toward Developing Guidelines for Daily Practice.","authors":"Heeyeon Kim, Sejin Oh, Hyungrye Noh, Byeonghyun Joo, Joonho Shim, Jihye Park, Dongyoun Lee, Jong Hee Lee","doi":"10.5021/ad.24.084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a growing demand for extending dosing intervals of dupilumab injections in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) due to treatment burden and side effects. However, studies on successful dose reduction in real-world settings are lacking.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the efficacy of a patient-centered dupilumab tapering regimen and to propose guidelines for target patients, appropriate intervals, and timing for tapering.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single-center retrospective study included moderate to severe adult AD patients who underwent at least 16 weeks of dupilumab treatment. Interval prolongation was considered in controlled patients assessed by Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and serum inflammatory markers after at least 40 weeks of treatment with a standard regimen. Logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations was used to compare repetitive measurements over time between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 52 patients were included with 11 patients extending intervals to 3-4 weeks without flare-ups. The mean duration of dupilumab treatment before tapering was 53.27 weeks. The tapering group exhibited significantly lower body mass index. All patients of the tapering group showed EASI scores under 4 and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels under 1,000 IU/mL at week 40. EASI scores and IgE levels remained consistently low after dose reduction, with a mean follow-up time of 14.36 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with extended dosing intervals demonstrated sustained effectiveness. Dose tapering might be a valuable option for non-obese patients with positive clinical response characterized by an EASI score under 4 and IgE levels under 1,000 at week 40.</p>","PeriodicalId":94298,"journal":{"name":"Annals of dermatology","volume":"37 1","pages":"39-45"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11791021/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5021/ad.24.084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a growing demand for extending dosing intervals of dupilumab injections in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) due to treatment burden and side effects. However, studies on successful dose reduction in real-world settings are lacking.

Objective: To assess the efficacy of a patient-centered dupilumab tapering regimen and to propose guidelines for target patients, appropriate intervals, and timing for tapering.

Methods: This single-center retrospective study included moderate to severe adult AD patients who underwent at least 16 weeks of dupilumab treatment. Interval prolongation was considered in controlled patients assessed by Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) score and serum inflammatory markers after at least 40 weeks of treatment with a standard regimen. Logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations was used to compare repetitive measurements over time between the two groups.

Results: A total of 52 patients were included with 11 patients extending intervals to 3-4 weeks without flare-ups. The mean duration of dupilumab treatment before tapering was 53.27 weeks. The tapering group exhibited significantly lower body mass index. All patients of the tapering group showed EASI scores under 4 and immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels under 1,000 IU/mL at week 40. EASI scores and IgE levels remained consistently low after dose reduction, with a mean follow-up time of 14.36 months.

Conclusion: Patients with extended dosing intervals demonstrated sustained effectiveness. Dose tapering might be a valuable option for non-obese patients with positive clinical response characterized by an EASI score under 4 and IgE levels under 1,000 at week 40.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人特应性皮炎患者Dupilumab的适当注射间隔:朝着制定日常实践指南迈出的一步。
背景:由于治疗负担和副作用,特应性皮炎(AD)患者对延长杜匹单抗注射给药间隔的需求越来越大。然而,缺乏在现实环境中成功减少剂量的研究。目的:评估以患者为中心的杜匹单抗减量方案的疗效,并为目标患者、适当的减量间隔和时间提出指南。方法:这项单中心回顾性研究纳入了接受至少16周dupilumab治疗的中度至重度成年AD患者。在标准方案治疗至少40周后,通过湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)评分和血清炎症标志物评估的对照患者考虑间隔延长。采用广义估计方程的Logistic回归模型比较两组间随时间的重复测量。结果:共纳入52例患者,其中11例延长间隔至3-4周无发作。dupilumab治疗前的平均持续时间为53.27周。变细组的体重指数明显降低。所有减量组患者在第40周时EASI评分低于4分,免疫球蛋白E (IgE)水平低于1,000 IU/mL。减药后EASI评分和IgE水平持续较低,平均随访时间为14.36个月。结论:延长给药间隔的患者表现出持续的疗效。对于在第40周EASI评分低于4分且IgE水平低于1000的临床反应为阳性的非肥胖患者,减量可能是一个有价值的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Illumination Removal for Accurate Skin Color Extraction Using Dermoscopy and Transformer-Based Modeling. Increased Serum Cold-Inducible RNA-Binding Protein Levels in Psoriasis. A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Psychological and Dermatologic Manifestations Post-February 6 Earthquakes in Dermatology Patients. Antifungal Effects of Non-Thermal Atmospheric Pressure Plasma In Vitro and Ex Vivo. Beyond the Face: An Exploratory Survey on Facial and Truncal Acne in High School Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1