Readiness for Mandatory Climate-Related Disclosures: A Tri-Jurisdictional Analysis of Governance Attributes in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Business Strategy and The Environment Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1002/bse.4154
Olayinka Moses, Binh Bui, Muhammad Nurul Houqe, Zahra Borghei
{"title":"Readiness for Mandatory Climate-Related Disclosures: A Tri-Jurisdictional Analysis of Governance Attributes in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom","authors":"Olayinka Moses,&nbsp;Binh Bui,&nbsp;Muhammad Nurul Houqe,&nbsp;Zahra Borghei","doi":"10.1002/bse.4154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We evaluate the preparedness of companies in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom to comply with emerging mandatory climate-related disclosures (CRDs) aligned with TCFD recommendations, using their Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) information. Our analysis also examines the corporate governance attributes influencing their readiness to disclose such information. The findings reveal a strong integration of the Governance aspect of TCFD-recommended disclosure, with an 86% alignment between CDP and TCFD disclosures in the Governance theme. However, lower alignment is observed for Strategy (50%) and Metrics and Targets (49%), highlighting the need for immediate improvements in these areas. Firms with more gender-diverse boards and the presence of a sustainability committee demonstrate greater readiness to comply with CRDs consistent with TCFD recommendations. These insights shed light on firms' readiness for emerging mandatory CRD across jurisdictions, especially considering the new IFRS sustainability standards. The results underscore the urgent need to enhance competencies in Strategy and Metrics and Targets, where alignment is weakest. Practically, by documenting these insights, we provide managers with early guidance on the implications of their current CRD practices. This is especially relevant for firms subject to, or soon to be impacted by, mandatory sustainability regulations in their jurisdictions. The findings hold paramount significance for managers, policymakers and regulators.</p>","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"34 3","pages":"3739-3763"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bse.4154","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bse.4154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We evaluate the preparedness of companies in Australia, New Zealand and the United Kingdom to comply with emerging mandatory climate-related disclosures (CRDs) aligned with TCFD recommendations, using their Carbon Disclosure Project (CDP) information. Our analysis also examines the corporate governance attributes influencing their readiness to disclose such information. The findings reveal a strong integration of the Governance aspect of TCFD-recommended disclosure, with an 86% alignment between CDP and TCFD disclosures in the Governance theme. However, lower alignment is observed for Strategy (50%) and Metrics and Targets (49%), highlighting the need for immediate improvements in these areas. Firms with more gender-diverse boards and the presence of a sustainability committee demonstrate greater readiness to comply with CRDs consistent with TCFD recommendations. These insights shed light on firms' readiness for emerging mandatory CRD across jurisdictions, especially considering the new IFRS sustainability standards. The results underscore the urgent need to enhance competencies in Strategy and Metrics and Targets, where alignment is weakest. Practically, by documenting these insights, we provide managers with early guidance on the implications of their current CRD practices. This is especially relevant for firms subject to, or soon to be impacted by, mandatory sustainability regulations in their jurisdictions. The findings hold paramount significance for managers, policymakers and regulators.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对强制性气候相关信息披露的准备:澳大利亚、新西兰和英国治理属性的三司法管辖区分析
我们利用澳大利亚、新西兰和英国的碳披露项目(CDP)信息,评估了这些国家的公司在遵守符合TCFD建议的强制性气候相关披露(crd)方面的准备情况。我们的分析还考察了影响其披露此类信息的公司治理属性。研究结果显示,在治理主题中,CDP和TCFD披露之间有86%的一致性,这与TCFD建议的披露的治理方面有很强的整合。然而,在战略(50%)和度量标准和目标(49%)方面观察到较低的一致性,突出了在这些领域立即改进的必要性。董事会性别多元化程度更高的公司,以及可持续发展委员会的存在,表明公司更愿意遵守符合TCFD建议的crd。这些见解揭示了公司对跨司法管辖区出现的强制性CRD的准备情况,特别是考虑到新的国际财务报告准则可持续性标准。结果强调了迫切需要加强战略、度量和目标方面的能力,这些方面的一致性是最弱的。实际上,通过记录这些见解,我们为管理人员提供了他们当前的CRD实践的含义的早期指导。这对于受其管辖范围内强制性可持续性法规约束或即将受其影响的公司尤其重要。研究结果对管理者、政策制定者和监管机构具有至关重要的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Strategic Leadership and ESG Performance: Evidence on Military‐Connected Boards in Thailand How to Navigate Disrupted Business Models in the 21st Century: At the Crossroads of the Circular Economy and the Industry 4.0 Transition A Business Framework for Product Take‐Back—A Structured Multiple‐Case Analysis Elaborating the Motivations and Attitudes Driving Interest in Voluntary Biodiversity Credits Sustainability and Stability: Examining the Impact of ESG Controversies and Executive Diversity on Financial Distress
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1