Relationship between skin microvascular blood flow and capillary refill time in critically ill patients

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1186/s13054-025-05285-y
Alexandra Morin, Louai Missri, Tomas Urbina, Vincent Bonny, Maxime Gasperment, Juliette Bernier, Jean-Luc Baudel, Eduardo Kattan, Eric Maury, Jérémie Joffre, Hafid Ait-Oufella
{"title":"Relationship between skin microvascular blood flow and capillary refill time in critically ill patients","authors":"Alexandra Morin, Louai Missri, Tomas Urbina, Vincent Bonny, Maxime Gasperment, Juliette Bernier, Jean-Luc Baudel, Eduardo Kattan, Eric Maury, Jérémie Joffre, Hafid Ait-Oufella","doi":"10.1186/s13054-025-05285-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capillary refill time (CRT) and skin blood flow (SBF) have been reported to be strong predictors of mortality in critically ill patients. However, the relationship between both parameters remains unclear. We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary teaching hospital. All patients older than 18 years admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) with circulatory failure and a measurable CRT were included. We assessed index SBF by laser doppler flowmetry and CRT on the fingertip, at T0 (Within the first 48 h from admission) and T1 (4 to 6 h later). Correlation was computed using Spearman or Pearson’s formula. During a 2-month period, 50 patients were included, 54% were admitted for sepsis. At baseline median CRT was 2.0 [1.1–3.9] seconds and median SBF was 46 [20–184] PU. At baseline SBF strongly correlated with CRT (R2 = 0.89; p < 0.0001, curvilinear relationship), this correlation was maintained whether patients were septic or not (R2 = 0.94; p = 0.0013; R2 = 0.87; p < 0.0001, respectively), and whether they received norepinephrine or not (R2 = 0.97; p = 0.0035; R2 = 0.92; p < 0.0001, respectively). Between T0 and T1, changes in SBF also significantly correlated with changes in CRT (R2 = 0.34; p < 0.0001). SBF was related to tissue perfusion parameters such as arterial lactate level (p = 0.02), whilst no correlation was found with cardiac output. In addition, only survivors significantly improved their SBF between T0 and T1. SBF was a powerful predictor of day-28 mortality as the AUROC at T0 was 85% [95% IC [76–91]] and at T1 90% [95% IC [78–100]]. We have shown that index CRT and SBF were correlated, providing evidence that CRT is a reliable marker of microvascular blood flow. Trial registration Comité de protection des personnes Ouest II N° 2023-A02046-39.","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-025-05285-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Capillary refill time (CRT) and skin blood flow (SBF) have been reported to be strong predictors of mortality in critically ill patients. However, the relationship between both parameters remains unclear. We conducted a prospective observational study in a tertiary teaching hospital. All patients older than 18 years admitted in the intensive care unit (ICU) with circulatory failure and a measurable CRT were included. We assessed index SBF by laser doppler flowmetry and CRT on the fingertip, at T0 (Within the first 48 h from admission) and T1 (4 to 6 h later). Correlation was computed using Spearman or Pearson’s formula. During a 2-month period, 50 patients were included, 54% were admitted for sepsis. At baseline median CRT was 2.0 [1.1–3.9] seconds and median SBF was 46 [20–184] PU. At baseline SBF strongly correlated with CRT (R2 = 0.89; p < 0.0001, curvilinear relationship), this correlation was maintained whether patients were septic or not (R2 = 0.94; p = 0.0013; R2 = 0.87; p < 0.0001, respectively), and whether they received norepinephrine or not (R2 = 0.97; p = 0.0035; R2 = 0.92; p < 0.0001, respectively). Between T0 and T1, changes in SBF also significantly correlated with changes in CRT (R2 = 0.34; p < 0.0001). SBF was related to tissue perfusion parameters such as arterial lactate level (p = 0.02), whilst no correlation was found with cardiac output. In addition, only survivors significantly improved their SBF between T0 and T1. SBF was a powerful predictor of day-28 mortality as the AUROC at T0 was 85% [95% IC [76–91]] and at T1 90% [95% IC [78–100]]. We have shown that index CRT and SBF were correlated, providing evidence that CRT is a reliable marker of microvascular blood flow. Trial registration Comité de protection des personnes Ouest II N° 2023-A02046-39.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
危重患者皮肤微血管血流与毛细血管再充血时间的关系
据报道,毛细血管再充血时间(CRT)和皮肤血流量(SBF)是危重患者死亡率的有力预测因子。然而,这两个参数之间的关系尚不清楚。我们在某三级教学医院进行了前瞻性观察研究。所有年龄大于18岁的重症监护病房(ICU)患者均有循环衰竭和可测量的CRT。在T0(入院后48小时内)和T1(入院后4 ~ 6小时),采用激光多普勒血流仪和指尖CRT评估SBF指数。使用Spearman或Pearson公式计算相关性。在2个月的时间内,纳入50例患者,其中54%因败血症入院。基线时,中位CRT为2.0[1.1-3.9]秒,中位SBF为46 [20-184]PU。基线时SBF与CRT呈正相关(R2 = 0.89;p < 0.0001,呈曲线关系),无论患者是否脓毒症均保持这种相关性(R2 = 0.94;p = 0.0013;r2 = 0.87;p < 0.0001),以及是否接受去甲肾上腺素治疗(R2 = 0.97;p = 0.0035;r2 = 0.92;P < 0.0001)。在T0和T1之间,SBF的变化也与CRT的变化显著相关(R2 = 0.34;p < 0.0001)。SBF与动脉乳酸水平等组织灌注参数相关(p = 0.02),而与心输出量无相关性。此外,只有幸存者在T0和T1之间显著改善了他们的SBF。SBF是28天死亡率的有力预测指标,因为T0时AUROC为85% [95% IC [76-91]], T1时为90% [95% IC[78-100]]。我们已经表明,指数CRT和SBF是相关的,提供证据,CRT是微血管血流的可靠标记。西部人身保护试验登记委员会第2023号- a02046 -39号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
期刊最新文献
Sliding doors at the bedside: conditional outcomes and moral judgments in end-of-life care. Determinants of diagnostic yield and scan quality of [18F]FDG PET/CT in critically ill patients suspected of infection or inflammation of unknown origin. Phenotype, subphenotype, and endotype in sepsis and ARDS: a new layer of heterogeneity? Procedural volume and outcomes of Impella support in cardiogenic shock. Prehospital extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in refractory out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: retrospective eligibility verification should not be conflated with prospective triage performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1