{"title":"Improved Aftershock Forecasts Using Mainshock Information in the Framework of the ETAS Model","authors":"Behnam M. Asayesh, Sebastian Hainzl, Gert Zöller","doi":"10.1029/2024JB030287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model is the most widely used and powerful statistical model for aftershock forecasting. While the distribution of aftershocks around the mainshock is anisotropic, the spatial probability density function of the ETAS model is commonly assumed to be isotropic due to insufficient information. In addition, its parameter estimation can be highly biased due to catalog incompleteness after the mainshock. Thus, we extended the recently developed 2D temporal ETASI, which accounts for short-term incompleteness, to 2D and 3D spatiotemporal ETASI, considering additional spatial occurrence probabilities in the framework of ETAS and ETASI to improve aftershock forecasting. We replaced the isotropic spatial kernel with anisotropic kernels estimated by a spatial probability map of stress scalars, including Coulomb stress changes on master fault orientation (MAS), Coulomb stress changes on variable mechanisms (VM), maximum shear (MS), and von Mises stress (VMS), and the nearest distance to the ruptured fault of the mainshock (R). The fit to six prominent mainshock-aftershock sequences in California demonstrates that the ETASI model outperforms the standard ETAS model. Furthermore, positive information gains indicate that using stress calculations as additional input information can improve the parameter fit. This improvement is weaker in 3D, which is likely related to greater positional uncertainty in the depth domain. However, incorporating the probability map calculated as a function of the nearest distance to the mainshock rupture leads to the best performance in all model variants.</p>","PeriodicalId":15864,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","volume":"130 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JB030287","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JB030287","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Epidemic Type Aftershock Sequence (ETAS) model is the most widely used and powerful statistical model for aftershock forecasting. While the distribution of aftershocks around the mainshock is anisotropic, the spatial probability density function of the ETAS model is commonly assumed to be isotropic due to insufficient information. In addition, its parameter estimation can be highly biased due to catalog incompleteness after the mainshock. Thus, we extended the recently developed 2D temporal ETASI, which accounts for short-term incompleteness, to 2D and 3D spatiotemporal ETASI, considering additional spatial occurrence probabilities in the framework of ETAS and ETASI to improve aftershock forecasting. We replaced the isotropic spatial kernel with anisotropic kernels estimated by a spatial probability map of stress scalars, including Coulomb stress changes on master fault orientation (MAS), Coulomb stress changes on variable mechanisms (VM), maximum shear (MS), and von Mises stress (VMS), and the nearest distance to the ruptured fault of the mainshock (R). The fit to six prominent mainshock-aftershock sequences in California demonstrates that the ETASI model outperforms the standard ETAS model. Furthermore, positive information gains indicate that using stress calculations as additional input information can improve the parameter fit. This improvement is weaker in 3D, which is likely related to greater positional uncertainty in the depth domain. However, incorporating the probability map calculated as a function of the nearest distance to the mainshock rupture leads to the best performance in all model variants.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth serves as the premier publication for the breadth of solid Earth geophysics including (in alphabetical order): electromagnetic methods; exploration geophysics; geodesy and gravity; geodynamics, rheology, and plate kinematics; geomagnetism and paleomagnetism; hydrogeophysics; Instruments, techniques, and models; solid Earth interactions with the cryosphere, atmosphere, oceans, and climate; marine geology and geophysics; natural and anthropogenic hazards; near surface geophysics; petrology, geochemistry, and mineralogy; planet Earth physics and chemistry; rock mechanics and deformation; seismology; tectonophysics; and volcanology.
JGR: Solid Earth has long distinguished itself as the venue for publication of Research Articles backed solidly by data and as well as presenting theoretical and numerical developments with broad applications. Research Articles published in JGR: Solid Earth have had long-term impacts in their fields.
JGR: Solid Earth provides a venue for special issues and special themes based on conferences, workshops, and community initiatives. JGR: Solid Earth also publishes Commentaries on research and emerging trends in the field; these are commissioned by the editors, and suggestion are welcome.