Fiscal decentralization and food production: Evidence from Province-Managing-County reform in China

IF 5.5 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS 中国经济评论 Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102342
Hongqi Ma , Cong Qin , Jingxian Zou , Wei Zhang
{"title":"Fiscal decentralization and food production: Evidence from Province-Managing-County reform in China","authors":"Hongqi Ma ,&nbsp;Cong Qin ,&nbsp;Jingxian Zou ,&nbsp;Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>China launched the Province-Managing-County reform in 2004. Since then, the transfer payments, particularly for agricultural purposes, were directly allocated to the reformed counties from their superordinate provincial government, bypassing the initial intermediary cities. The reformed counties also reserved a larger share of tax revenue within the adjusted tax-sharing arrangement with upper cities. Based on the gradual roll-out of the reform, we utilize a difference-in-differences approach and a county panel ranging from 2003 to 2018, finding that the fiscal reform contributes to the promotion of food production. Theoretically, the fiscal reform would affect food production through the changes of fiscal self-sufficiency and transfer payments. However, the results only provided evidence to support the latter channel. That is, the Province-Managing-County reform raised agricultural expenditure by effectively allocating transfer payments (mainly special transfer payments) to counties, leading to a significant enhancement of land productivity at the county level, primarily manifested in an increase in the per unit area of irrigated land.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48285,"journal":{"name":"中国经济评论","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 102342"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国经济评论","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1043951X24002311","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China launched the Province-Managing-County reform in 2004. Since then, the transfer payments, particularly for agricultural purposes, were directly allocated to the reformed counties from their superordinate provincial government, bypassing the initial intermediary cities. The reformed counties also reserved a larger share of tax revenue within the adjusted tax-sharing arrangement with upper cities. Based on the gradual roll-out of the reform, we utilize a difference-in-differences approach and a county panel ranging from 2003 to 2018, finding that the fiscal reform contributes to the promotion of food production. Theoretically, the fiscal reform would affect food production through the changes of fiscal self-sufficiency and transfer payments. However, the results only provided evidence to support the latter channel. That is, the Province-Managing-County reform raised agricultural expenditure by effectively allocating transfer payments (mainly special transfer payments) to counties, leading to a significant enhancement of land productivity at the county level, primarily manifested in an increase in the per unit area of irrigated land.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
财政分权与粮食生产:来自中国省管县改革的证据
2004年,中国启动了省管县改革。从那时起,转移支付,特别是农业转移支付,直接从上级省级政府拨给改革县,绕过最初的中间城市。改革后的县也在调整后的上级市分税制安排中保留了更大的税收份额。基于改革的逐步推进,我们采用了差异中的差异方法,并对2003年至2018年的县进行了调查,发现财政改革有助于促进粮食生产。理论上,财政改革将通过财政自给和转移支付的变化来影响粮食生产。然而,结果只提供了支持后一种渠道的证据。即,省管县改革通过有效分配对县的转移支付(主要是专项转移支付),提高了农业支出,导致县一级土地生产率显著提高,主要表现为单位面积灌溉土地面积的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
中国经济评论
中国经济评论 ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
4.40%
发文量
380
期刊介绍: The China Economic Review publishes original works of scholarship which add to the knowledge of the economy of China and to economies as a discipline. We seek, in particular, papers dealing with policy, performance and institutional change. Empirical papers normally use a formal model, a data set, and standard statistical techniques. Submissions are subjected to double-blind peer review.
期刊最新文献
Regulatory bias under fiscal stress: Evidence from non-local firms in maritime transport enforcement The hysteresis effects of investment shocks in China Targeted environmental policy and public welfare: Evidence from fireworks deregulation in China Returns to college education of Chinese manufacturing employees: Who benefits more? How do very small businesses survive in a rent-seeking society? Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1