158 Deaths at Halloween Night: An AcciMap analysis of 2022 Itaewon crowd crush in South Korea

IF 5.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106741
Changwon Son , Dong-Han Ham , Sangeun Jin , Taezoon Park
{"title":"158 Deaths at Halloween Night: An AcciMap analysis of 2022 Itaewon crowd crush in South Korea","authors":"Changwon Son ,&nbsp;Dong-Han Ham ,&nbsp;Sangeun Jin ,&nbsp;Taezoon Park","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A crowd crush that occurred in Itaewon, South Korea during Halloween in 2022 resulted in 158 people. Much attention was paid to finding culprits rather than identifying underlying factors and their complex relationships. Hence, this study aims to analyze systemic causes of Itaewon crowd crush. AcciMap was conducted to understand what caused the crush and resultant deaths using two information sources: South Korean National Assembly Report and online news articles. Findings suggest that lifted COVID-19 restrictions, increased popularity of Halloween, and political and social factors related to a new government significantly increased the crowd size. Despite anticipated risks of crowd crush, including direct calls from citizens, little was done before and after the crush. Pre-planning was not conducted, and on-site controls were insufficient. After the crush, unified incident communication was non-existent and inter-agency collaboration was poorly coordinated, leading to severe delay in site access, triage, medical treatment, and hospitalization. Until Itaewon disaster, a crowd crush was not covered by overarching disaster management law of South Korea. To prevent similar crowd crushes, recommendations include <em>trans</em>-governmental efforts to identify emergent impacts of policy, cultural, and administrative changes, all-hazards management approach, improving national safety leadership and risk governance, safety culture sensitive to failure, and nationwide crowd management system. As the first and early systemic analysis of Itaewon crowd crush, our findings highlighted the need to understand influences from various sociotechnical factors. We hope our study to inform future investigations of Itaewon crowd crush and induce more rigorous efforts to prevent similar incidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106741"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575352400331X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A crowd crush that occurred in Itaewon, South Korea during Halloween in 2022 resulted in 158 people. Much attention was paid to finding culprits rather than identifying underlying factors and their complex relationships. Hence, this study aims to analyze systemic causes of Itaewon crowd crush. AcciMap was conducted to understand what caused the crush and resultant deaths using two information sources: South Korean National Assembly Report and online news articles. Findings suggest that lifted COVID-19 restrictions, increased popularity of Halloween, and political and social factors related to a new government significantly increased the crowd size. Despite anticipated risks of crowd crush, including direct calls from citizens, little was done before and after the crush. Pre-planning was not conducted, and on-site controls were insufficient. After the crush, unified incident communication was non-existent and inter-agency collaboration was poorly coordinated, leading to severe delay in site access, triage, medical treatment, and hospitalization. Until Itaewon disaster, a crowd crush was not covered by overarching disaster management law of South Korea. To prevent similar crowd crushes, recommendations include trans-governmental efforts to identify emergent impacts of policy, cultural, and administrative changes, all-hazards management approach, improving national safety leadership and risk governance, safety culture sensitive to failure, and nationwide crowd management system. As the first and early systemic analysis of Itaewon crowd crush, our findings highlighted the need to understand influences from various sociotechnical factors. We hope our study to inform future investigations of Itaewon crowd crush and induce more rigorous efforts to prevent similar incidents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
万圣节之夜158人死亡:2022年韩国梨泰院人群拥挤事件的AcciMap分析
2022年万圣节期间,在韩国梨泰院发生的人群拥挤事件导致158人死亡。人们把更多的注意力放在寻找罪魁祸首上,而不是找出潜在的因素及其复杂的关系。因此,本研究旨在分析梨泰院人群拥挤的系统性原因。通过两种信息来源:韩国国民议会报告和在线新闻文章,开展了AcciMap,以了解造成踩踏和由此造成的死亡的原因。调查结果显示,解除新冠肺炎限制、万圣节人气上升以及与新政府相关的政治和社会因素显著增加了人群规模。尽管预计到人群拥挤的风险,包括市民的直接呼叫,但在拥挤之前和之后几乎没有采取任何措施。没有进行预先规划,现场控制不足。踩踏事件发生后,没有统一的事件通信,机构间协作协调不力,导致现场访问、分流、医疗和住院严重延误。在梨泰院发生事故之前,韩国的总体灾害管理法并不包括人群拥挤事件。为了防止类似的人群拥挤,建议包括跨政府努力确定政策、文化和行政变革的紧急影响,采取全危害管理方法,改善国家安全领导和风险治理,对失败敏感的安全文化,以及全国性的人群管理系统。作为对梨泰院人群挤压的第一个早期系统分析,我们的研究结果强调了了解各种社会技术因素影响的必要性。我们希望我们的研究能为今后梨泰院人群踩踏事件的调查提供信息,并促使采取更严格的措施来防止类似事件的发生。”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Electric motorcycle crash severity: a random parameters logit model considering interaction effects and counterfactual policy evaluation Enablers of Quantitative Risk Assessments in Major Hazard Facilities versus those in Fire Safety Engineering Driving safety excellence: A multifaceted analysis of leading indicators across industries Safety, identity, and inequity at the last mile: a qualitative study of app-based bicycle delivery riders in Spain Psychometric validation of the Turkish Short form of the disaster resilience scale for individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1