158 Deaths at Halloween Night: An AcciMap analysis of 2022 Itaewon crowd crush in South Korea

IF 4.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2024-12-06 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106741
Changwon Son , Dong-Han Ham , Sangeun Jin , Taezoon Park
{"title":"158 Deaths at Halloween Night: An AcciMap analysis of 2022 Itaewon crowd crush in South Korea","authors":"Changwon Son ,&nbsp;Dong-Han Ham ,&nbsp;Sangeun Jin ,&nbsp;Taezoon Park","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A crowd crush that occurred in Itaewon, South Korea during Halloween in 2022 resulted in 158 people. Much attention was paid to finding culprits rather than identifying underlying factors and their complex relationships. Hence, this study aims to analyze systemic causes of Itaewon crowd crush. AcciMap was conducted to understand what caused the crush and resultant deaths using two information sources: South Korean National Assembly Report and online news articles. Findings suggest that lifted COVID-19 restrictions, increased popularity of Halloween, and political and social factors related to a new government significantly increased the crowd size. Despite anticipated risks of crowd crush, including direct calls from citizens, little was done before and after the crush. Pre-planning was not conducted, and on-site controls were insufficient. After the crush, unified incident communication was non-existent and inter-agency collaboration was poorly coordinated, leading to severe delay in site access, triage, medical treatment, and hospitalization. Until Itaewon disaster, a crowd crush was not covered by overarching disaster management law of South Korea. To prevent similar crowd crushes, recommendations include <em>trans</em>-governmental efforts to identify emergent impacts of policy, cultural, and administrative changes, all-hazards management approach, improving national safety leadership and risk governance, safety culture sensitive to failure, and nationwide crowd management system. As the first and early systemic analysis of Itaewon crowd crush, our findings highlighted the need to understand influences from various sociotechnical factors. We hope our study to inform future investigations of Itaewon crowd crush and induce more rigorous efforts to prevent similar incidents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106741"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S092575352400331X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A crowd crush that occurred in Itaewon, South Korea during Halloween in 2022 resulted in 158 people. Much attention was paid to finding culprits rather than identifying underlying factors and their complex relationships. Hence, this study aims to analyze systemic causes of Itaewon crowd crush. AcciMap was conducted to understand what caused the crush and resultant deaths using two information sources: South Korean National Assembly Report and online news articles. Findings suggest that lifted COVID-19 restrictions, increased popularity of Halloween, and political and social factors related to a new government significantly increased the crowd size. Despite anticipated risks of crowd crush, including direct calls from citizens, little was done before and after the crush. Pre-planning was not conducted, and on-site controls were insufficient. After the crush, unified incident communication was non-existent and inter-agency collaboration was poorly coordinated, leading to severe delay in site access, triage, medical treatment, and hospitalization. Until Itaewon disaster, a crowd crush was not covered by overarching disaster management law of South Korea. To prevent similar crowd crushes, recommendations include trans-governmental efforts to identify emergent impacts of policy, cultural, and administrative changes, all-hazards management approach, improving national safety leadership and risk governance, safety culture sensitive to failure, and nationwide crowd management system. As the first and early systemic analysis of Itaewon crowd crush, our findings highlighted the need to understand influences from various sociotechnical factors. We hope our study to inform future investigations of Itaewon crowd crush and induce more rigorous efforts to prevent similar incidents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting the visual ergonomics of train drivers in VR simulation driving: Snow and Ice line environment and train speed Pedestrian behavior under time pressure: A VR-based study of waiting duration and crashes at signalized intersection Optimization of emergency shelter layout with consideration of toxic gas leakage based on a cell transmission model On the user-based assessments of virtual reality for public safety training in urban open spaces depending on immersion levels The influence of individual characteristics and working environment on driving performance of truck drivers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1