ChatGPT and CLT: Investigating differences in multimodal processing

Michael Cahalane, Samuel N. Kirshner
{"title":"ChatGPT and CLT: Investigating differences in multimodal processing","authors":"Michael Cahalane,&nbsp;Samuel N. Kirshner","doi":"10.1016/j.ject.2024.11.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Drawing on construal level theory, recent studies have demonstrated that ChatGPT interprets text inputs from an abstract perspective. However, as ChatGPT has evolved into a multimodal tool, this research examines whether ChatGPT's abstraction bias extends to image-based prompts. In a pre-registered study utilising hierarchical letters, ChatGPT predominantly associated these images with local rather than global letters, suggesting a concrete bias when analysing images. This starkly contrasts human participants who predominantly identified the same images with the global letters, indicating that humans and ChatGPT significantly diverge in image interpretations. Furthermore, while humans generally perceive ChatGPT to be more concrete in image processing, there is a notable discrepancy between this perception and the actual level of concreteness exhibited by ChatGPT in handling image-based tasks. These findings provide insights into the distinct cognitive behaviours of LLMs compared to humans, contributing to an emerging understanding of LLM cognition in the context of multimodal inputs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100776,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economy and Technology","volume":"3 ","pages":"Pages 10-21"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949948824000611","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing on construal level theory, recent studies have demonstrated that ChatGPT interprets text inputs from an abstract perspective. However, as ChatGPT has evolved into a multimodal tool, this research examines whether ChatGPT's abstraction bias extends to image-based prompts. In a pre-registered study utilising hierarchical letters, ChatGPT predominantly associated these images with local rather than global letters, suggesting a concrete bias when analysing images. This starkly contrasts human participants who predominantly identified the same images with the global letters, indicating that humans and ChatGPT significantly diverge in image interpretations. Furthermore, while humans generally perceive ChatGPT to be more concrete in image processing, there is a notable discrepancy between this perception and the actual level of concreteness exhibited by ChatGPT in handling image-based tasks. These findings provide insights into the distinct cognitive behaviours of LLMs compared to humans, contributing to an emerging understanding of LLM cognition in the context of multimodal inputs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Federated learning and information sharing between competitors with different training effectiveness ChatGPT and CLT: Investigating differences in multimodal processing Creative destruction and artificial intelligence: The transformation of industries during the sixth wave Leveraging the digital sustainable growth model (DSGM) to drive economic growth: Transforming innovation uncertainty into scalable technology Agriculture 4.0 adoption challenges in the emerging economies: Implications for smart farming and sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1