Constructing collective learning

Femke Nijland , Marjan Vermeulen
{"title":"Constructing collective learning","authors":"Femke Nijland ,&nbsp;Marjan Vermeulen","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) in education are intended to promote both individual and collective learning; however, collective learning does not always materialize. This study aimed to deepen our understanding of the processes that shape collective learning, by focusing on a cognitive perspective on collective learning thus complementing the more commonly used social perspective on collective learning in PLCs. This cognitive perspective consisted of collective learning as the interplay between the psychological mechanisms of self-categorization, collective attention, common knowledge, and collective identity. Using a qualitative case study approach, that involved interviewing all eleven members of two newly formed multidisciplinary PLCs, experiences with constructing collective learning were collected. A combinatory inductive and deductive analysis was performed, which confirmed the foundational mechanisms of collective learning as defined by the cognitive perspective. In addition, a fifth mechanism<em>, social equivalence</em>, was distinguished, which offers further insight into the interaction between self-categorization and collective attention during the early stages of PLC functioning. Social equivalence refers to the process through which members of PLCs attribute constructed similarities—such as shared values and norms—to their peers at an abstract level. These similarities not necessarily have a basis in reality, but they serve to foster connectivity, facilitating collective learning relationships with unfamiliar individuals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101260"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124004571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional Learning Communities (PLCs) in education are intended to promote both individual and collective learning; however, collective learning does not always materialize. This study aimed to deepen our understanding of the processes that shape collective learning, by focusing on a cognitive perspective on collective learning thus complementing the more commonly used social perspective on collective learning in PLCs. This cognitive perspective consisted of collective learning as the interplay between the psychological mechanisms of self-categorization, collective attention, common knowledge, and collective identity. Using a qualitative case study approach, that involved interviewing all eleven members of two newly formed multidisciplinary PLCs, experiences with constructing collective learning were collected. A combinatory inductive and deductive analysis was performed, which confirmed the foundational mechanisms of collective learning as defined by the cognitive perspective. In addition, a fifth mechanism, social equivalence, was distinguished, which offers further insight into the interaction between self-categorization and collective attention during the early stages of PLC functioning. Social equivalence refers to the process through which members of PLCs attribute constructed similarities—such as shared values and norms—to their peers at an abstract level. These similarities not necessarily have a basis in reality, but they serve to foster connectivity, facilitating collective learning relationships with unfamiliar individuals.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting preschool teachers' implementation of STEAM activities: A quantitative study in Vietnam Memes, freedom, and resilience to information disorders: Information warfare between democracies and autocracies Uncovering relevant mathematics topics for home economics: Senior high school students' views in Cape Coast, Ghana Examining factors influencing enrolment intention in Islamic higher education in Indonesia, does Islamic senior high school matter? Role of governance index, democracy, industrialization, and urbanization on environmental sustainability of BRICS countries: A novel PMG-ARDL approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1