Advancing occupational and system safety in Industry 5.0: Effective HAZID, risk analysis frameworks, and human-AI interaction management

IF 5.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106770
Kamran Gholamizadeh , Esmaeil Zarei , Luca Gualtieri , Matteo De Marchi
{"title":"Advancing occupational and system safety in Industry 5.0: Effective HAZID, risk analysis frameworks, and human-AI interaction management","authors":"Kamran Gholamizadeh ,&nbsp;Esmaeil Zarei ,&nbsp;Luca Gualtieri ,&nbsp;Matteo De Marchi","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As Industry 5.0 evolves, this study addresses critical aspects of system and occupational safety through hazard identification (HAZID), risk analysis, and the interaction between humans and artificial intelligence (HI and AI). This review investigates existing literature to answer three key research questions: (1) How is HAZID conducted to meet the safety demands of Industry 5.0? (2) What constitutes an effective risk analysis framework for this era? (3) How can conflicts between HI and AI be managed to enhance system reliability? The findings demonstrate that AI-driven approaches significantly improve HAZID processes and underscore the necessity of tailored risk analysis frameworks for effective safety management. Additionally, strategies to mitigate HI-AI conflicts are discussed, highlighting the importance of policies that foster decision-making and reliability in human-AI collaboration. The study concludes with practical recommendations for advancing safety management in complex socio-technical systems within Industry 5.0.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106770"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003606","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As Industry 5.0 evolves, this study addresses critical aspects of system and occupational safety through hazard identification (HAZID), risk analysis, and the interaction between humans and artificial intelligence (HI and AI). This review investigates existing literature to answer three key research questions: (1) How is HAZID conducted to meet the safety demands of Industry 5.0? (2) What constitutes an effective risk analysis framework for this era? (3) How can conflicts between HI and AI be managed to enhance system reliability? The findings demonstrate that AI-driven approaches significantly improve HAZID processes and underscore the necessity of tailored risk analysis frameworks for effective safety management. Additionally, strategies to mitigate HI-AI conflicts are discussed, highlighting the importance of policies that foster decision-making and reliability in human-AI collaboration. The study concludes with practical recommendations for advancing safety management in complex socio-technical systems within Industry 5.0.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进工业5.0中的职业和系统安全:有效的HAZID、风险分析框架和人机交互管理
随着工业5.0的发展,本研究通过危害识别(HAZID)、风险分析以及人类与人工智能(HI和AI)之间的相互作用,解决了系统和职业安全的关键方面。本文通过对已有文献的梳理,回答了三个关键的研究问题:(1)如何实施HAZID以满足工业5.0的安全要求?(2)什么构成了这个时代有效的风险分析框架?(3)如何管理人机交互和人工智能之间的冲突以提高系统可靠性?研究结果表明,人工智能驱动的方法显著改善了HAZID流程,并强调了为有效的安全管理量身定制风险分析框架的必要性。此外,本文还讨论了缓解HI-AI冲突的策略,强调了促进人类- ai协作决策和可靠性的政策的重要性。该研究最后提出了在工业5.0中推进复杂社会技术系统安全管理的实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Electric motorcycle crash severity: a random parameters logit model considering interaction effects and counterfactual policy evaluation Enablers of Quantitative Risk Assessments in Major Hazard Facilities versus those in Fire Safety Engineering Driving safety excellence: A multifaceted analysis of leading indicators across industries Safety, identity, and inequity at the last mile: a qualitative study of app-based bicycle delivery riders in Spain Psychometric validation of the Turkish Short form of the disaster resilience scale for individuals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1