Hierarchical safety analysis and formal verification for safety-critical systems using STAMP and Event-B

IF 5.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Safety Science Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106744
Zuxi Chen , Chuanjun Niu , Meng Mei , Hongyang Zhang
{"title":"Hierarchical safety analysis and formal verification for safety-critical systems using STAMP and Event-B","authors":"Zuxi Chen ,&nbsp;Chuanjun Niu ,&nbsp;Meng Mei ,&nbsp;Hongyang Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ssci.2024.106744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>As safety-critical systems become increasingly complex, ensuring the safety of systems that govern critical functions affecting human activities and the environment is paramount. The inherent complexities of developing such systems necessitate a rigorous approach, as demanded by industrial standards, yet the process for ensuring safety remains inadequately defined. This paper presents a novel integration of System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) with Event-B, employing a hierarchical and “middle-out” systems engineering strategy to manage complexity and improve safety verification. By applying STPA to derive and allocate safety requirements throughout a hierarchical Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) model, and synchronizing these requirements with the formal verification steps of Event-B, our method effectively closes the gap between system development and safety engineering. The effectiveness of this approach is showcased through its application to the safety-critical Automatic Train Protection (ATP) subsystem in the Communication-Based Train Control (CBTC) system.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21375,"journal":{"name":"Safety Science","volume":"184 ","pages":"Article 106744"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Safety Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925753524003345","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As safety-critical systems become increasingly complex, ensuring the safety of systems that govern critical functions affecting human activities and the environment is paramount. The inherent complexities of developing such systems necessitate a rigorous approach, as demanded by industrial standards, yet the process for ensuring safety remains inadequately defined. This paper presents a novel integration of System-Theoretic Process Analysis (STPA) with Event-B, employing a hierarchical and “middle-out” systems engineering strategy to manage complexity and improve safety verification. By applying STPA to derive and allocate safety requirements throughout a hierarchical Systems-Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) model, and synchronizing these requirements with the formal verification steps of Event-B, our method effectively closes the gap between system development and safety engineering. The effectiveness of this approach is showcased through its application to the safety-critical Automatic Train Protection (ATP) subsystem in the Communication-Based Train Control (CBTC) system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用STAMP和Event-B对安全关键系统进行分层安全分析和形式化验证
随着安全关键系统变得越来越复杂,确保管理影响人类活动和环境的关键功能的系统的安全至关重要。根据工业标准的要求,开发此类系统的固有复杂性需要采用严格的方法,但确保安全的过程仍然没有充分定义。本文提出了一种新的系统理论过程分析(STPA)与事件- b的集成,采用分层和“中间”系统工程策略来管理复杂性和提高安全性验证。通过应用STPA在分层系统理论事故模型和过程(STAMP)模型中推导和分配安全需求,并将这些需求与Event-B的形式化验证步骤同步,我们的方法有效地缩小了系统开发与安全工程之间的差距。通过将该方法应用于基于通信的列车控制(CBTC)系统中对安全至关重要的列车自动保护(ATP)子系统,证明了该方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Safety Science
Safety Science 管理科学-工程:工业
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
9.80%
发文量
335
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Safety Science is multidisciplinary. Its contributors and its audience range from social scientists to engineers. The journal covers the physics and engineering of safety; its social, policy and organizational aspects; the assessment, management and communication of risks; the effectiveness of control and management techniques for safety; standardization, legislation, inspection, insurance, costing aspects, human behavior and safety and the like. Papers addressing the interfaces between technology, people and organizations are especially welcome.
期刊最新文献
Enablers of Quantitative Risk Assessments in Major Hazard Facilities versus those in Fire Safety Engineering Driving safety excellence: A multifaceted analysis of leading indicators across industries Safety, identity, and inequity at the last mile: a qualitative study of app-based bicycle delivery riders in Spain Psychometric validation of the Turkish Short form of the disaster resilience scale for individuals Ship availability after a megathrust earthquake and tsunami event: A case study on Canada’s West Coast
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1