Impact of surgical treatment on neonatal management in extremely low birth weight infants: Single-center retrospective study

Seiichiro Inoue, Yuki Muta, Yuta Takeuchi, Kohei Kawaguchi, Akio Odaka
{"title":"Impact of surgical treatment on neonatal management in extremely low birth weight infants: Single-center retrospective study","authors":"Seiichiro Inoue,&nbsp;Yuki Muta,&nbsp;Yuta Takeuchi,&nbsp;Kohei Kawaguchi,&nbsp;Akio Odaka","doi":"10.1016/j.gpeds.2024.100240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Few studies have examined the details of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (i.e., infants with a birth weight &lt; 1000 g) on neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) who require surgical treatment. Therefore, we analyzed mortality, morbidity, and clinical variables in ELBW infants who received surgical treatments at our center from 2009 to 2022.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>All ELBW infants were included who received surgical treatment at our NICU from January 2009 to December 2022. We compared data from infants treated in the early (2009–2015) and late (2016–2022) periods and investigated trends in mortality, morbidity, and clinical variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 678 ELBW infants were admitted and cared at our neonatal center and 56 ELBW infants were received surgical treatment. The number of patients who received surgical treatment increased in the late period (10.4 % (36/345)) compared to the early period (6.33 % (20/316)) (early vs late period: <em>p</em> = 0.0398). The indications for surgery were expanded in late period compared to early periods. In the late period, the survival rate was higher (63.5 vs 75.0 %: early vs late period). No statistical difference was observed between the early and late period in the duration of the NICU stay. However, the duration of NICU stay in died patients were shorter compared to the survived patients (median (lower -upper quartiles):196.5 (166.75–261.25 vs 75.0 (49.0–183.5): early vs late period). The total number of surgical treatments which each patient received were higher in survived cases (median (lower -upper quartiles): 2.0 (2.0–4.0) vs 1.0 (1.0–2.0): survived vs died cases: <em>p</em> = 0.013).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Recent advances in NICU care have expanded the indications for surgical treatment in ELBW infants. Survival rates appear to have improved. In more recent years, patients have increasingly undergone multi-step surgical treatment, which we consider to be a result of the improved the systemic status of infants in perioperative period.</div></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><div>3</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73173,"journal":{"name":"Global pediatrics","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100240"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266700972400109X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Few studies have examined the details of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants (i.e., infants with a birth weight < 1000 g) on neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) who require surgical treatment. Therefore, we analyzed mortality, morbidity, and clinical variables in ELBW infants who received surgical treatments at our center from 2009 to 2022.

Methods

All ELBW infants were included who received surgical treatment at our NICU from January 2009 to December 2022. We compared data from infants treated in the early (2009–2015) and late (2016–2022) periods and investigated trends in mortality, morbidity, and clinical variables.

Results

A total of 678 ELBW infants were admitted and cared at our neonatal center and 56 ELBW infants were received surgical treatment. The number of patients who received surgical treatment increased in the late period (10.4 % (36/345)) compared to the early period (6.33 % (20/316)) (early vs late period: p = 0.0398). The indications for surgery were expanded in late period compared to early periods. In the late period, the survival rate was higher (63.5 vs 75.0 %: early vs late period). No statistical difference was observed between the early and late period in the duration of the NICU stay. However, the duration of NICU stay in died patients were shorter compared to the survived patients (median (lower -upper quartiles):196.5 (166.75–261.25 vs 75.0 (49.0–183.5): early vs late period). The total number of surgical treatments which each patient received were higher in survived cases (median (lower -upper quartiles): 2.0 (2.0–4.0) vs 1.0 (1.0–2.0): survived vs died cases: p = 0.013).

Conclusions

Recent advances in NICU care have expanded the indications for surgical treatment in ELBW infants. Survival rates appear to have improved. In more recent years, patients have increasingly undergone multi-step surgical treatment, which we consider to be a result of the improved the systemic status of infants in perioperative period.

Level of evidence

3
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global pediatrics
Global pediatrics Perinatology, Pediatrics and Child Health
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Determinants of essential newborn care for institutional births in Bangladesh: Findings from the 2019 MICS Survey The present and the future of point-of-care ultrasound in Pediatric Care Impact and frequency of misdiagnosis of appendicitis in pediatric patients with gastroenteritis in a developing country Cost-effectiveness evaluation of neonatal emergency transport organization in Italy Identifying birth asphyxia risk factors: Case-control study of new-borns delivered at public health institutions in Gedeo Zone, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1