How to calculate GHG emissions in freight transport? A review of the main existing online tools

IF 3.3 Q3 TRANSPORTATION Case Studies on Transport Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-10 DOI:10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101343
Erika Olivari , Claudia Caballini , Xavier Lluch
{"title":"How to calculate GHG emissions in freight transport? A review of the main existing online tools","authors":"Erika Olivari ,&nbsp;Claudia Caballini ,&nbsp;Xavier Lluch","doi":"10.1016/j.cstp.2024.101343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>About 23 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions are caused by the transportation sector. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development freight transport-related demand in 2050 is expected to triple compared to the values recorded in 2019. In order to comply with regulations that aim to meet precise targets in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, it is necessary to objectively measure the impact of transportation activities with the aim of mitigating emissions. To do this, it is mandatory to have accurate and user-friendly calculation tools. The purpose of this paper is to compare the most widely used tools to assess CO<sub>2</sub>e transport emissions in transportation, also comparing them to the GLEC methodology, which is compliant with ISO regulations universally recognized as the most appropriate procedure. 3 case studies related to intermodal transport scenarios are assessed and compared using the considered tools. Based on the analyses performed, this research finally proposes some recommendations for reliable calculation of CO<sub>2</sub>e emissions, in compliance with ISO 14083.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46989,"journal":{"name":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 101343"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Case Studies on Transport Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213624X24001986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

About 23 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions are caused by the transportation sector. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development freight transport-related demand in 2050 is expected to triple compared to the values recorded in 2019. In order to comply with regulations that aim to meet precise targets in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions, it is necessary to objectively measure the impact of transportation activities with the aim of mitigating emissions. To do this, it is mandatory to have accurate and user-friendly calculation tools. The purpose of this paper is to compare the most widely used tools to assess CO2e transport emissions in transportation, also comparing them to the GLEC methodology, which is compliant with ISO regulations universally recognized as the most appropriate procedure. 3 case studies related to intermodal transport scenarios are assessed and compared using the considered tools. Based on the analyses performed, this research finally proposes some recommendations for reliable calculation of CO2e emissions, in compliance with ISO 14083.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何计算货物运输中的温室气体排放量?回顾现有的主要在线工具
全球约23%的温室气体排放是由交通部门造成的。根据经济合作与发展组织(oecd)的数据,预计2050年与货运相关的需求将是2019年的三倍。为了遵守旨在达到减少温室气体排放方面的精确目标的法规,有必要客观地衡量以减轻排放为目的的运输活动的影响。要做到这一点,必须有准确和用户友好的计算工具。本文的目的是比较最广泛使用的工具来评估交通运输中的二氧化碳排放量,并将它们与GLEC方法进行比较,GLEC方法符合ISO法规,被普遍认为是最合适的程序。使用所考虑的工具评估和比较与多式联运方案相关的3个案例研究。基于所进行的分析,本研究最终提出了一些符合ISO 14083的可靠计算二氧化碳排放量的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
222
期刊最新文献
From gasoline to green: understanding the acceptance of electric motorcycles from the motorcyclists’ perspective – evidence from Tehran Connecting or dividing London? Evaluating the impact of the Elizabeth Line on job accessibility and spatial equity Simulation-based decision-making framework for sustainable intermodal transport including next-generation freight electric multiple-units Integrating non-motorized transportation with light rail transit: travel demand models for Rayong, Thailand Temporal heterogeneity in sociotechnical urban mobility systems: Evidence from distributed lag models in Curitiba, Brazil
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1