Exploring the influence of teachers' academic rank in advancing inclination to TPACK in art education

Social sciences & humanities open Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101252
Masoumeh Shiri , Karim Baigutov
{"title":"Exploring the influence of teachers' academic rank in advancing inclination to TPACK in art education","authors":"Masoumeh Shiri ,&nbsp;Karim Baigutov","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>This study aims to examine the factors of digital literacy, digital skills, and teachers' academic rank on the level of inclination in TPACK among art teachers at the studied university. Specifically, the study investigates how teachers' academic rank can influence their inclination toward TPACK. Additionally, it classifies and analyzes teachers' digital literacy and digital skills based on their academic rank.</div></div><div><h3>Design/methodology</h3><div>This study employs both survey and descriptive research methodologies to create a survey-based approach for measuring teachers' digital literacy, digital skills, and their inclination towards TPACK, using a sample of 35 art teachers at the studied university. Furthermore, observational methods were used to describe the current situation and gather data.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>The findings reveal that teachers' academic rank plays a significant role in the increase or decrease of their level of digital literacy. Overall, teachers' digital skills were found to be lower than their digital literacy, indicating the challenges teachers face in solving hardware and software problems when using TPACK. Additionally, the study found that inclination of teachers to adopt teaching methods that integrate technology, art, and educational content was rated highly.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The results indicate that teachers' academic rank significantly influences their level of digital literacy, which consequently increases their inclination towards TPACK. The study also found that lecturers have lower digital skills and, therefore, less inclination towards TPACK.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101252"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291124004492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to examine the factors of digital literacy, digital skills, and teachers' academic rank on the level of inclination in TPACK among art teachers at the studied university. Specifically, the study investigates how teachers' academic rank can influence their inclination toward TPACK. Additionally, it classifies and analyzes teachers' digital literacy and digital skills based on their academic rank.

Design/methodology

This study employs both survey and descriptive research methodologies to create a survey-based approach for measuring teachers' digital literacy, digital skills, and their inclination towards TPACK, using a sample of 35 art teachers at the studied university. Furthermore, observational methods were used to describe the current situation and gather data.

Findings

The findings reveal that teachers' academic rank plays a significant role in the increase or decrease of their level of digital literacy. Overall, teachers' digital skills were found to be lower than their digital literacy, indicating the challenges teachers face in solving hardware and software problems when using TPACK. Additionally, the study found that inclination of teachers to adopt teaching methods that integrate technology, art, and educational content was rated highly.

Conclusion

The results indicate that teachers' academic rank significantly influences their level of digital literacy, which consequently increases their inclination towards TPACK. The study also found that lecturers have lower digital skills and, therefore, less inclination towards TPACK.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探讨教师学术等级对促进艺术教育中TPACK倾向的影响
目的本研究旨在探讨数位素养、数位技能和教师学术等级对所研究大学美术教师TPACK倾向水平的影响。具体而言,本研究调查了教师的学术等级如何影响他们对TPACK的倾向。此外,根据教师的学术排名,对教师的数字素养和数字技能进行分类和分析。设计/方法本研究采用调查和描述性研究方法,创建了一种基于调查的方法来衡量教师的数字素养、数字技能以及他们对TPACK的倾向,使用了研究大学35名艺术教师的样本。此外,采用观测方法描述现状并收集数据。研究结果显示,教师的学术等级对其数字素养水平的上升或下降起着重要作用。总体而言,教师的数字技能低于他们的数字素养,这表明教师在使用TPACK时面临解决硬件和软件问题的挑战。此外,研究发现,教师倾向于采用整合技术,艺术和教育内容的教学方法的评价很高。结论教师的学术等级对其数字素养水平有显著影响,从而增加了教师的数字素养倾向。该研究还发现,讲师的数字技能较低,因此不太倾向于使用TPACK。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
期刊最新文献
Inflation trajectory in Ghana from dawn to dusk a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review Nurse workforce shortage and health system challenges in Bangladesh: A narrative review Comparative study of cultural heritage sustainability: A bibliometric analysis Mapping artificial-intelligence-driven innovation in higher education: A bibliometric review Social aspects of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven sustainability in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review with insights on labor market transformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1