Reassessing academic integrity in the age of AI: A systematic literature review on AI and academic integrity

Social sciences & humanities open Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299
Himendra Balalle, Sachini Pannilage
{"title":"Reassessing academic integrity in the age of AI: A systematic literature review on AI and academic integrity","authors":"Himendra Balalle,&nbsp;Sachini Pannilage","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Academic integrity is a key factor in the quality of education that represents honesty, trust, and ethical conduct. In today's rapidly changing educational landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) poses significant challenges to the educational ecosystem's ability to maintain academic integrity. It also affects the qualifications offered by institutes. Although AI supports students in completing academic tasks, it usually risks violating the basic rules of academic integrity. In addition, AI can be used to detect academic misconduct. This study aims to critically examine the impact of AI on academic integrity through a systematic literature review. The research question was developed using the PICO framework, and the articles considered in this study were collected from Scopus, PubMed, DOAJ, and Base. Of 1443 articles, 25 were selected based on the PRISMA framework. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROBINS-1) to analyse the risk of bias in the selected studies. The discussion section was developed based on PICO frameworks – population of the study, intervention with AI tools, comparison of modern and traditional methods, and outcome of AI use for academic activities – to answer the research question. This research contributes to the ongoing dialogue about AI and academic integrity by emphasising the importance of a balanced approach to using the benefits of AI in education while upholding ethical standards. This study concludes by emphasising the importance of creating a culture of academic integrity to ensure the ethical use of AI for educational purposes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101299"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125000269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Academic integrity is a key factor in the quality of education that represents honesty, trust, and ethical conduct. In today's rapidly changing educational landscape, artificial intelligence (AI) poses significant challenges to the educational ecosystem's ability to maintain academic integrity. It also affects the qualifications offered by institutes. Although AI supports students in completing academic tasks, it usually risks violating the basic rules of academic integrity. In addition, AI can be used to detect academic misconduct. This study aims to critically examine the impact of AI on academic integrity through a systematic literature review. The research question was developed using the PICO framework, and the articles considered in this study were collected from Scopus, PubMed, DOAJ, and Base. Of 1443 articles, 25 were selected based on the PRISMA framework. We used the Cochrane risk of bias tool (ROBINS-1) to analyse the risk of bias in the selected studies. The discussion section was developed based on PICO frameworks – population of the study, intervention with AI tools, comparison of modern and traditional methods, and outcome of AI use for academic activities – to answer the research question. This research contributes to the ongoing dialogue about AI and academic integrity by emphasising the importance of a balanced approach to using the benefits of AI in education while upholding ethical standards. This study concludes by emphasising the importance of creating a culture of academic integrity to ensure the ethical use of AI for educational purposes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能时代学术诚信的再评估:人工智能与学术诚信的系统文献综述
学术诚信是教育质量的关键因素,它代表着诚实、信任和道德行为。在当今瞬息万变的教育环境中,人工智能(AI)对教育生态系统维护学术诚信的能力构成了重大挑战。这也影响了学院提供的资格。虽然人工智能支持学生完成学业任务,但它通常有违反学术诚信基本规则的风险。此外,人工智能还可以用来检测学术不端行为。本研究旨在通过系统的文献综述,批判性地审视人工智能对学术诚信的影响。研究问题是使用PICO框架开发的,本研究中考虑的文章收集自Scopus, PubMed, DOAJ和Base。在1443篇文章中,根据PRISMA框架选择了25篇。我们使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具(ROBINS-1)分析所选研究的偏倚风险。讨论部分是基于PICO框架(研究人口、人工智能工具的干预、现代和传统方法的比较以及人工智能用于学术活动的结果)来回答研究问题的。这项研究强调了在坚持道德标准的同时,在教育中利用人工智能的好处的平衡方法的重要性,从而有助于关于人工智能和学术诚信的持续对话。本研究最后强调了创建学术诚信文化的重要性,以确保人工智能在教育目的中的道德使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
期刊最新文献
Inflation trajectory in Ghana from dawn to dusk a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review Nurse workforce shortage and health system challenges in Bangladesh: A narrative review Comparative study of cultural heritage sustainability: A bibliometric analysis Mapping artificial-intelligence-driven innovation in higher education: A bibliometric review Social aspects of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven sustainability in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review with insights on labor market transformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1