Market broadening and future volatility: A study of Russell 2000 and S&P 500 equal weight ETFs

IF 3.9 3区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE North American Journal of Economics and Finance Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-13 DOI:10.1016/j.najef.2025.102369
Abbas Valadkhani , Barry O'Mahony
{"title":"Market broadening and future volatility: A study of Russell 2000 and S&P 500 equal weight ETFs","authors":"Abbas Valadkhani ,&nbsp;Barry O'Mahony","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2025.102369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the relationship between market broadening and future volatility in the U.S. using monthly data from May 2003 to July 2024. Market broadening is measured by the price returns of two exchange-traded funds (ETFs): the S&amp;P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and the Russell 2000 Equal Weight ETF (IWM). We employ an Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (EGARCH) model to ensure the conditional variance remains positive, even when ETF returns are negative. Our findings support an inverted-U hypothesis, suggesting that market gains were more widely dispersed until 2014 but have since become concentrated among mega-cap stocks. More importantly, the results indicate that broadening market participation significantly reduces future volatility. This effect is consistent regardless of whether market broadening is measured using RSP or IWM. Our estimated time-varying GARCH series exhibit strong co-movements and co-jumpings with the VIX index, accurately capturing most of its turning points and critical events. This study offers practical insights into market behavior, investment strategies, and the risks of gains mainly driven by mega-cap companies, especially for market-cap ETF investors, without the need to analyze individual stocks or use hard-to-get data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825000099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper investigates the relationship between market broadening and future volatility in the U.S. using monthly data from May 2003 to July 2024. Market broadening is measured by the price returns of two exchange-traded funds (ETFs): the S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and the Russell 2000 Equal Weight ETF (IWM). We employ an Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (EGARCH) model to ensure the conditional variance remains positive, even when ETF returns are negative. Our findings support an inverted-U hypothesis, suggesting that market gains were more widely dispersed until 2014 but have since become concentrated among mega-cap stocks. More importantly, the results indicate that broadening market participation significantly reduces future volatility. This effect is consistent regardless of whether market broadening is measured using RSP or IWM. Our estimated time-varying GARCH series exhibit strong co-movements and co-jumpings with the VIX index, accurately capturing most of its turning points and critical events. This study offers practical insights into market behavior, investment strategies, and the risks of gains mainly driven by mega-cap companies, especially for market-cap ETF investors, without the need to analyze individual stocks or use hard-to-get data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场扩大和未来波动:罗素2000和标准普尔500等权重etf的研究
本文利用2003年5月至2024年7月的月度数据,研究了美国市场扩张与未来波动之间的关系。市场扩大是通过两种交易所交易基金(ETF)的价格回报来衡量的:标普500等权重ETF (RSP)和罗素2000等权重ETF (IWM)。我们采用指数广义自回归条件异方差(EGARCH)模型来确保条件方差保持为正,即使ETF收益为负。我们的研究结果支持倒u型假设,即市场收益在2014年之前更为分散,但此后集中在大型股中。更重要的是,结果表明,扩大市场参与可以显著降低未来的波动性。无论市场扩大是用RSP还是IWM来衡量,这种效应都是一致的。我们估计的时变GARCH系列与VIX指数表现出强烈的共同运动和共同跳跃,准确地捕捉了它的大多数转折点和关键事件。这项研究为市场行为、投资策略以及主要由大型公司驱动的收益风险提供了实用的见解,特别是对于市值ETF投资者而言,无需分析个股或使用难以获得的数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
168
期刊介绍: The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic conditional correlations and connectedness in emerging-market exchange rates§ Systemic risk in corporate bond markets: Thematic vs. Exogenous recessions “Climatic, financial, and economic systemic risk in the Spanish stock market: An analysis based on artificial intelligence and complex networks” The role of geopolitical risk on the ESG stock market: evidence from functional data analysis The impact of coordination of monetary policy and macroprudential policy on systemic risks in the real estate market
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1