{"title":"Market broadening and future volatility: A study of Russell 2000 and S&P 500 equal weight ETFs","authors":"Abbas Valadkhani , Barry O'Mahony","doi":"10.1016/j.najef.2025.102369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper investigates the relationship between market broadening and future volatility in the U.S. using monthly data from May 2003 to July 2024. Market broadening is measured by the price returns of two exchange-traded funds (ETFs): the S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and the Russell 2000 Equal Weight ETF (IWM). We employ an Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (EGARCH) model to ensure the conditional variance remains positive, even when ETF returns are negative. Our findings support an inverted-U hypothesis, suggesting that market gains were more widely dispersed until 2014 but have since become concentrated among mega-cap stocks. More importantly, the results indicate that broadening market participation significantly reduces future volatility. This effect is consistent regardless of whether market broadening is measured using RSP or IWM. Our estimated time-varying GARCH series exhibit strong co-movements and co-jumpings with the VIX index, accurately capturing most of its turning points and critical events. This study offers practical insights into market behavior, investment strategies, and the risks of gains mainly driven by mega-cap companies, especially for market-cap ETF investors, without the need to analyze individual stocks or use hard-to-get data.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47831,"journal":{"name":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","volume":"76 ","pages":"Article 102369"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"North American Journal of Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1062940825000099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper investigates the relationship between market broadening and future volatility in the U.S. using monthly data from May 2003 to July 2024. Market broadening is measured by the price returns of two exchange-traded funds (ETFs): the S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF (RSP) and the Russell 2000 Equal Weight ETF (IWM). We employ an Exponential Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (EGARCH) model to ensure the conditional variance remains positive, even when ETF returns are negative. Our findings support an inverted-U hypothesis, suggesting that market gains were more widely dispersed until 2014 but have since become concentrated among mega-cap stocks. More importantly, the results indicate that broadening market participation significantly reduces future volatility. This effect is consistent regardless of whether market broadening is measured using RSP or IWM. Our estimated time-varying GARCH series exhibit strong co-movements and co-jumpings with the VIX index, accurately capturing most of its turning points and critical events. This study offers practical insights into market behavior, investment strategies, and the risks of gains mainly driven by mega-cap companies, especially for market-cap ETF investors, without the need to analyze individual stocks or use hard-to-get data.
期刊介绍:
The focus of the North-American Journal of Economics and Finance is on the economics of integration of goods, services, financial markets, at both regional and global levels with the role of economic policy in that process playing an important role. Both theoretical and empirical papers are welcome. Empirical and policy-related papers that rely on data and the experiences of countries outside North America are also welcome. Papers should offer concrete lessons about the ongoing process of globalization, or policy implications about how governments, domestic or international institutions, can improve the coordination of their activities. Empirical analysis should be capable of replication. Authors of accepted papers will be encouraged to supply data and computer programs.