Recognising and responding to acute patient deterioration in the perioperative environment – A simulation-based learning approach to meeting National Healthcare Standards criteria

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Collegian Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2024.12.002
Scott Lamont , Zoe Kumar , Pooja Bhusal
{"title":"Recognising and responding to acute patient deterioration in the perioperative environment – A simulation-based learning approach to meeting National Healthcare Standards criteria","authors":"Scott Lamont ,&nbsp;Zoe Kumar ,&nbsp;Pooja Bhusal","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.12.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Deterioration in acute healthcare settings is associated with serious adverse sequelae. A National Standards framework for healthcare facilities in Australia has mandated that such facilities provide evidence that satisfies criteria relating to acute deterioration recognition and response. Whilst education and training of healthcare practitioners have been prominent since National Standards inception, state-wide mandatory training programs have not been sensitive to the perioperative context.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To evaluate the effectiveness of a perioperative simulation-based learning program in building capacity for perioperative staff in acute patient deterioration recognition and response.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A multiple group post-test design using quantitative measures was undertaken. Participants were a consecutive sample of perioperative nursing staff (n=56) employed across three hospitals in Sydney who self-enrolled in simulation-based learning workshops. Each six-hour workshop focussed on four acute deterioration scenarios: Anaphylaxis, Malignant Hyperthermia, Post-Partum Haemorrhage, and Local Anaesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Simulation effectiveness was measured using the 19-item Simulation Effectiveness Tool–Modified. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and qualitative content analysis was used for an open-ended question.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>All 19 items elicited a high degree of ‘strongly agree’, ranging from 57.1% to 89.6%, with only four of the 19 items achieving less than 80% ‘strongly agree’. Content analysis generated two primary categories: <em>‘Self-efficacy enabling professional autonomy’</em> and <em>‘Relevant and authentic representation’</em>.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><div>Perioperative simulation-based learning can enhance clinical proficiency and professional autonomy, whilst developing clinical reasoning, teamwork, and delegation skills.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Perioperative simulation-based learning was perceived as effective in preparing nursing staff working in the perioperative specialty for real-world clinical emergencies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"32 1","pages":"Pages 46-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000830","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Deterioration in acute healthcare settings is associated with serious adverse sequelae. A National Standards framework for healthcare facilities in Australia has mandated that such facilities provide evidence that satisfies criteria relating to acute deterioration recognition and response. Whilst education and training of healthcare practitioners have been prominent since National Standards inception, state-wide mandatory training programs have not been sensitive to the perioperative context.

Aim

To evaluate the effectiveness of a perioperative simulation-based learning program in building capacity for perioperative staff in acute patient deterioration recognition and response.

Methods

A multiple group post-test design using quantitative measures was undertaken. Participants were a consecutive sample of perioperative nursing staff (n=56) employed across three hospitals in Sydney who self-enrolled in simulation-based learning workshops. Each six-hour workshop focussed on four acute deterioration scenarios: Anaphylaxis, Malignant Hyperthermia, Post-Partum Haemorrhage, and Local Anaesthetic Systemic Toxicity. Simulation effectiveness was measured using the 19-item Simulation Effectiveness Tool–Modified. Descriptive statistics were calculated, and qualitative content analysis was used for an open-ended question.

Findings

All 19 items elicited a high degree of ‘strongly agree’, ranging from 57.1% to 89.6%, with only four of the 19 items achieving less than 80% ‘strongly agree’. Content analysis generated two primary categories: ‘Self-efficacy enabling professional autonomy’ and ‘Relevant and authentic representation’.

Discussion

Perioperative simulation-based learning can enhance clinical proficiency and professional autonomy, whilst developing clinical reasoning, teamwork, and delegation skills.

Conclusion

Perioperative simulation-based learning was perceived as effective in preparing nursing staff working in the perioperative specialty for real-world clinical emergencies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A qualitative analysis of the role of the Hospital in the Home registered nurse in Australia Evaluating a community nursing education program to support patients during chemotherapy treatment Exploring the experiences of nurses working in the outdoor COVID-19 testing clinics: A qualitative descriptive study The impact of an intravenous e-learning application on nursing students’ knowledge level: A quasi-experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1