CO2-driven crop comparative advantage and planting decision: Evidence from US cropland

IF 6 1区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Food Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102782
Ziheng Liu
{"title":"CO2-driven crop comparative advantage and planting decision: Evidence from US cropland","authors":"Ziheng Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2024.102782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In addition to the well-known per-acre yield benefits, elevated CO<sub>2</sub> also influences cropping patterns. An important characteristic of CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization is that C3 crops exhibit a more pronounced response to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> levels in comparison to C4 crops. Such differential responses of C3 and C4 crops to increasing CO<sub>2</sub> levels are likely to alter cropping patterns in favor of C3 crops, as CO<sub>2</sub> provides C3 crops with a comparative advantage. This study empirically investigates the CO<sub>2</sub> effects on the corn and soybean acreage, the most representative C4 and C3 crops, in the U.S. Employing an instrumental variable that exploits exogenous variation driven by wind, I find that a one-ppm rise in CO<sub>2</sub> significantly reduces the corn acreage by 1.19% and increases the soybean acreage by 1.51%. The CO<sub>2</sub>-driven shrinkage in corn acreage may involve switching to soybeans, spring wheat, and cotton, with CO<sub>2</sub>-driven soybean expansion achieved by replacing corn and sorghum. Neglecting the CO<sub>2</sub>-driven acreage shift would lead, according to the forecast simulations, to an underestimation of the CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization effect on soybean production and an overestimation of the CO<sub>2</sub> fertilization effect on corn production. Given the diverse uses of corn and soybeans, such shifts in their acreage and production could have important implications for multiple sectors and market dynamics.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 102782"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919224001933","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In addition to the well-known per-acre yield benefits, elevated CO2 also influences cropping patterns. An important characteristic of CO2 fertilization is that C3 crops exhibit a more pronounced response to elevated CO2 levels in comparison to C4 crops. Such differential responses of C3 and C4 crops to increasing CO2 levels are likely to alter cropping patterns in favor of C3 crops, as CO2 provides C3 crops with a comparative advantage. This study empirically investigates the CO2 effects on the corn and soybean acreage, the most representative C4 and C3 crops, in the U.S. Employing an instrumental variable that exploits exogenous variation driven by wind, I find that a one-ppm rise in CO2 significantly reduces the corn acreage by 1.19% and increases the soybean acreage by 1.51%. The CO2-driven shrinkage in corn acreage may involve switching to soybeans, spring wheat, and cotton, with CO2-driven soybean expansion achieved by replacing corn and sorghum. Neglecting the CO2-driven acreage shift would lead, according to the forecast simulations, to an underestimation of the CO2 fertilization effect on soybean production and an overestimation of the CO2 fertilization effect on corn production. Given the diverse uses of corn and soybeans, such shifts in their acreage and production could have important implications for multiple sectors and market dynamics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二氧化碳驱动的作物比较优势和种植决策:来自美国农田的证据
除了众所周知的亩产效益外,二氧化碳浓度升高也会影响种植模式。CO2施肥的一个重要特征是C3作物比C4作物对CO2浓度升高的反应更明显。C3和C4作物对二氧化碳浓度增加的这种差异反应可能会改变种植模式,有利于C3作物,因为二氧化碳为C3作物提供了比较优势。本研究实证研究了二氧化碳对美国最具代表性的C4和C3作物玉米和大豆种植面积的影响,采用了一个利用风驱动的外源变化的工具变量,我发现二氧化碳每增加1 ppm,玉米种植面积显著减少1.19%,大豆种植面积显著增加1.51%。二氧化碳驱动的玉米种植面积萎缩可能涉及到大豆、春小麦和棉花的种植,而二氧化碳驱动的大豆种植面积扩张则通过取代玉米和高粱来实现。根据预测模拟,忽略二氧化碳驱动的面积变化将导致低估CO2施肥对大豆产量的影响,高估CO2施肥对玉米产量的影响。鉴于玉米和大豆的多种用途,其种植面积和产量的这种变化可能对多个部门和市场动态产生重要影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Food Policy
Food Policy 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.60%
发文量
128
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies. Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.
期刊最新文献
Disruption in ground transportation: Natural disasters and disintegration of local food markets Modelled health impacts of three stakeholder-selected policies to support healthy and environmentally sustainable population diets in New Zealand Information exposure and economic losses during food safety outbreaks: Evidence from onion markets and Google Trends Leveraging social protection to strengthen Women’s and Girls’ Climate-Resilience in agrifood systems Recent approaches in agricultural production economics: Where the heck are the prices?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1