Unpacking the doctoral journey in India: Supervision, social support, and institutional factors influencing mental health and research engagement

Social sciences & humanities open Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101282
Suhalia Parveen , Juhi Yasmeen , Mohd Ajmal , Md. Tauseef Qamar , Shahab Saquib Sohail , Dag Øivind Madsen
{"title":"Unpacking the doctoral journey in India: Supervision, social support, and institutional factors influencing mental health and research engagement","authors":"Suhalia Parveen ,&nbsp;Juhi Yasmeen ,&nbsp;Mohd Ajmal ,&nbsp;Md. Tauseef Qamar ,&nbsp;Shahab Saquib Sohail ,&nbsp;Dag Øivind Madsen","doi":"10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The research explores the impact of supervisory styles, social support systems, and institutional factors on the mental well-being and research engagement of PhD students within the Indian higher education context. Using a Grounded Theory approach, we conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 40 doctoral students from three faculties at a reputed public Indian university. Thematic analysis revealed nine key factors affecting students' mental health and research engagement: (a) inadequate mentorship, (b) prolonged evaluation processes, (c) exploitation as unpaid labor, (d) unprofessional supervisor behavior, (e) inefficient resource access, (f) reduced motivation, (g) limited peer collaboration, (h) financial instability, and (i) health impacts. Findings indicate that (a) supervisory support, (b) peer collaboration, and (c) financial security significantly reduce stress and enhance engagement, while insufficient support and competitive peer dynamics increase anxiety and disengagement. Gender-based differences were also observed, with female students often reporting distinct social support experiences. These findings highlight the need for improved supervisory practices, supportive institutional policies, and mental health resources to promote inclusive and supportive academic environments for doctoral students. This study offers practical implications for enhancing well-being and productivity in Indian higher education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74826,"journal":{"name":"Social sciences & humanities open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 101282"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social sciences & humanities open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590291125000099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research explores the impact of supervisory styles, social support systems, and institutional factors on the mental well-being and research engagement of PhD students within the Indian higher education context. Using a Grounded Theory approach, we conducted qualitative, semi-structured interviews with 40 doctoral students from three faculties at a reputed public Indian university. Thematic analysis revealed nine key factors affecting students' mental health and research engagement: (a) inadequate mentorship, (b) prolonged evaluation processes, (c) exploitation as unpaid labor, (d) unprofessional supervisor behavior, (e) inefficient resource access, (f) reduced motivation, (g) limited peer collaboration, (h) financial instability, and (i) health impacts. Findings indicate that (a) supervisory support, (b) peer collaboration, and (c) financial security significantly reduce stress and enhance engagement, while insufficient support and competitive peer dynamics increase anxiety and disengagement. Gender-based differences were also observed, with female students often reporting distinct social support experiences. These findings highlight the need for improved supervisory practices, supportive institutional policies, and mental health resources to promote inclusive and supportive academic environments for doctoral students. This study offers practical implications for enhancing well-being and productivity in Indian higher education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解读印度博士之旅:监督、社会支持和影响心理健康和研究参与的制度因素
该研究探讨了在印度高等教育背景下,管理风格、社会支持系统和制度因素对博士生心理健康和研究参与的影响。采用扎根理论的方法,我们对来自印度一所著名公立大学三个院系的40名博士生进行了定性的半结构化访谈。专题分析揭示了影响学生心理健康和研究参与的九个关键因素:(a)指导不足,(b)评估过程延长,(c)作为无偿劳动的剥削,(d)不专业的主管行为,(e)资源获取效率低下,(f)动机降低,(g)同伴合作有限,(h)财务不稳定,以及(i)健康影响。研究结果表明:(a)监管支持、(b)同伴协作和(c)财务安全显著降低压力并提高敬业度,而支持不足和竞争同伴动态则增加焦虑和脱离敬业度。基于性别的差异也被观察到,女学生经常报告不同的社会支持经历。这些发现强调需要改进监督实践、支持性制度政策和心理健康资源,以促进博士生包容和支持性的学术环境。本研究为提高印度高等教育的幸福感和生产力提供了实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Social sciences & humanities open
Social sciences & humanities open Psychology (General), Decision Sciences (General), Social Sciences (General)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
159 days
期刊最新文献
Inflation trajectory in Ghana from dawn to dusk a bibliometric analysis and systematic literature review Nurse workforce shortage and health system challenges in Bangladesh: A narrative review Comparative study of cultural heritage sustainability: A bibliometric analysis Mapping artificial-intelligence-driven innovation in higher education: A bibliometric review Social aspects of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven sustainability in Saudi Arabia: A systematic review with insights on labor market transformations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1