Subgrade cumulative deformation probabilistic prediction method based on machine learning

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109233
Zhixing Deng , Linrong Xu , Yongwei Li , Yunhao Chen , Na Su , Yuanxingzi He
{"title":"Subgrade cumulative deformation probabilistic prediction method based on machine learning","authors":"Zhixing Deng ,&nbsp;Linrong Xu ,&nbsp;Yongwei Li ,&nbsp;Yunhao Chen ,&nbsp;Na Su ,&nbsp;Yuanxingzi He","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To overcome the issues of limited generalization ability and unreliable prediction outcomes in subgrade cumulative deformation (SCD) models, a probabilistic prediction approach combining a data-driven neural network (DEDNN) and the Bootstrap method is introduced. Firstly, three DEDNN models are developed based on ANNs and empirical information, and the optimal DEDNN model is determined through a multi-level comprehensive assessment system. Secondly, four Bootstrap algorithms are used to modify the uncertainty in the optimal DEDNN model, namely Pairs, Residuals, Wild, and Moving Block Bootstrap, to develop and prefer the probabilistic prediction model for SCD.</div><div>Ultimately, the optimal probabilistic prediction model is employed to perform advanced prediction analysis, assessing the long-term deformation stability of the subgrade. With the help of a subgrade test section and the excitation test, a case study is carried out. The findings indicate that integrating empirical information with neural networks significantly improves the overall performance of SCD prediction models, identifying the empiricism-constrained neural network (ECNN) as the optimal DEDNN model. The prediction intervals obtained by the four Bootstrap algorithms cover the measured SCD values, and the Wild Bootstrap algorithm is determined to be the optimal Bootstrap algorithm because it has the smallest <em>CWC</em> value (0.5170 mm). The SCD is controlled within 4 mm at the end of the excitation test, and the prediction upper limit from the advanced probabilistic prediction is stabilized at 4.62183 mm, indicating that the long-term SCD value meets the requirements.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109233"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125000260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To overcome the issues of limited generalization ability and unreliable prediction outcomes in subgrade cumulative deformation (SCD) models, a probabilistic prediction approach combining a data-driven neural network (DEDNN) and the Bootstrap method is introduced. Firstly, three DEDNN models are developed based on ANNs and empirical information, and the optimal DEDNN model is determined through a multi-level comprehensive assessment system. Secondly, four Bootstrap algorithms are used to modify the uncertainty in the optimal DEDNN model, namely Pairs, Residuals, Wild, and Moving Block Bootstrap, to develop and prefer the probabilistic prediction model for SCD.
Ultimately, the optimal probabilistic prediction model is employed to perform advanced prediction analysis, assessing the long-term deformation stability of the subgrade. With the help of a subgrade test section and the excitation test, a case study is carried out. The findings indicate that integrating empirical information with neural networks significantly improves the overall performance of SCD prediction models, identifying the empiricism-constrained neural network (ECNN) as the optimal DEDNN model. The prediction intervals obtained by the four Bootstrap algorithms cover the measured SCD values, and the Wild Bootstrap algorithm is determined to be the optimal Bootstrap algorithm because it has the smallest CWC value (0.5170 mm). The SCD is controlled within 4 mm at the end of the excitation test, and the prediction upper limit from the advanced probabilistic prediction is stabilized at 4.62183 mm, indicating that the long-term SCD value meets the requirements.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
期刊最新文献
A system identification technique for the estimation of the bulk modulus based on pore water pressure dissipation records Deep learning-based stochastic ground motion modeling using generative adversarial and convolutional neural networks Analytical approach to influencing mechanism of cement-soil reinforcement on horizontal dynamic response of single piles Evaluation of overburden correction factor (Kσ) of pond ash for liquefaction analysis under earthquake loading Hysteresis model of metal rubber bridge bearings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1