Predictive model for assessing the nonlinear surface displacement and mechanical response of shallowly buried tunnels under dip-slip fault dislocation

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109229
Mingnian Wang , Henghong Yang , Li Yu , Xiao Zhang
{"title":"Predictive model for assessing the nonlinear surface displacement and mechanical response of shallowly buried tunnels under dip-slip fault dislocation","authors":"Mingnian Wang ,&nbsp;Henghong Yang ,&nbsp;Li Yu ,&nbsp;Xiao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2025.109229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The fault dislocation induces permanent ground surface displacement, leading to severe damage to tunnels. However, there is a notable scarcity of predictive models for nonlinear surface displacement and tunnel response under dip-slip fault dislocation. Previous analytical models have oversimplified surface displacement to a constant value. To this end, first, a predictive model for assessing the mechanical response of shallowly buried tunnels under dip-slip fault dislocation is established. Then, through a mathematical statistical analysis of field-measured data, a prediction method of nonlinear dip-slip surface displacement has been developed, and the nonlinear dip-slip surface displacement is introduced into the predictive model. The predictive model incorporates nonlinear surface displacement, fault zone width, and geometric nonlinearity, thereby markedly enhancing the accuracy of the calculation results. Secondly, the prediction model undergoes validation through experimental tests and numerical simulations, revealing a maximum error of 3.7 %. In contrast, neglecting nonlinear surface displacement can result in calculation errors as high as 517.5 %. Finally, the proposed predictive model is applied to conduct a parameter analysis, such as maximum surface displacement (<em>Δ</em><sub>dmax</sub>), dip angle (<em>α</em>), and fault zone width (<em>W</em><sub>F</sub>). The results shown that the maximum axial force (<em>N</em><sub>max</sub>), maximum shear force (<em>V</em><sub>zmax</sub>), and maximum bending moment (<em>M</em><sub>zmax</sub>) of the tunnel increase with the augmentation of <em>Δ</em><sub>dmax</sub>. For each incremental increase of 0.2 m in <em>Δ</em><sub>dmax</sub>, the <em>N</em><sub>max</sub>, <em>V</em><sub>zmax</sub>, and <em>M</em><sub>zmax</sub> exhibit an approximate increase of 22.1 %–100.3 %. The <em>N</em><sub>max</sub> and decreases with the increasing <em>α</em>, whereas both the <em>V</em><sub>zmax</sub> and the <em>M</em><sub>zmax</sub> increase as <em>α</em> rises. With each incremental increase of 10° in <em>α</em>, the <em>N</em><sub>max</sub> diminishes by approximately 16.1 %–49.2 %, while both the <em>V</em><sub>zmax</sub> and <em>M</em><sub>zmax</sub> experience an increase ranging from about 4.6 % to 19.1 %. An increase in <em>W</em><sub>F</sub> results in a decrease in the <em>V</em><sub>zmax</sub> and the <em>M</em><sub>zmax</sub> exerted on the tunnel. For every increment of 10 m in <em>W</em><sub>F</sub>, both the <em>V</em><sub>zmax</sub> and <em>M</em><sub>zmax</sub> decrease by approximately 15.8 %–32.3 %.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"191 ","pages":"Article 109229"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726125000223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fault dislocation induces permanent ground surface displacement, leading to severe damage to tunnels. However, there is a notable scarcity of predictive models for nonlinear surface displacement and tunnel response under dip-slip fault dislocation. Previous analytical models have oversimplified surface displacement to a constant value. To this end, first, a predictive model for assessing the mechanical response of shallowly buried tunnels under dip-slip fault dislocation is established. Then, through a mathematical statistical analysis of field-measured data, a prediction method of nonlinear dip-slip surface displacement has been developed, and the nonlinear dip-slip surface displacement is introduced into the predictive model. The predictive model incorporates nonlinear surface displacement, fault zone width, and geometric nonlinearity, thereby markedly enhancing the accuracy of the calculation results. Secondly, the prediction model undergoes validation through experimental tests and numerical simulations, revealing a maximum error of 3.7 %. In contrast, neglecting nonlinear surface displacement can result in calculation errors as high as 517.5 %. Finally, the proposed predictive model is applied to conduct a parameter analysis, such as maximum surface displacement (Δdmax), dip angle (α), and fault zone width (WF). The results shown that the maximum axial force (Nmax), maximum shear force (Vzmax), and maximum bending moment (Mzmax) of the tunnel increase with the augmentation of Δdmax. For each incremental increase of 0.2 m in Δdmax, the Nmax, Vzmax, and Mzmax exhibit an approximate increase of 22.1 %–100.3 %. The Nmax and decreases with the increasing α, whereas both the Vzmax and the Mzmax increase as α rises. With each incremental increase of 10° in α, the Nmax diminishes by approximately 16.1 %–49.2 %, while both the Vzmax and Mzmax experience an increase ranging from about 4.6 % to 19.1 %. An increase in WF results in a decrease in the Vzmax and the Mzmax exerted on the tunnel. For every increment of 10 m in WF, both the Vzmax and Mzmax decrease by approximately 15.8 %–32.3 %.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
倾斜断层位错作用下浅埋隧道非线性地表位移和力学响应预测模型
断层错动引起地表永久性位移,对隧道造成严重破坏。然而,对于倾斜断层位错作用下的非线性地表位移和隧道响应的预测模型却非常缺乏。以前的分析模型将地表位移过分简化为一个常数。为此,首先建立了倾斜断层错动作用下浅埋隧道力学响应的预测模型。然后,通过对现场实测数据的数理统计分析,建立了非线性倾滑地表位移的预测方法,并将非线性倾滑地表位移引入预测模型。该预测模型考虑了地表位移非线性、断裂带宽度非线性和几何非线性,从而显著提高了计算结果的精度。其次,通过实验和数值模拟对预测模型进行了验证,最大误差为3.7%。而忽略非线性表面位移,计算误差高达517.5%。最后,应用该预测模型进行了地表最大位移(Δdmax)、倾角(α)、断裂带宽度(WF)等参数分析。结果表明:随着Δdmax的增大,隧道的最大轴力(Nmax)、最大剪切力(Vzmax)和最大弯矩(Mzmax)均增大;Δdmax每增加0.2 m, Nmax、Vzmax和Mzmax大约增加22.1% ~ 100.3%。Nmax和Mzmax随α的增大而减小,Vzmax和Mzmax随α的增大而增大。α每增加10°,Nmax减少约16.1% ~ 49.2%,而Vzmax和Mzmax增加约4.6% ~ 19.1%。WF的增大导致Vzmax和施加在隧道上的Mzmax减小。WF每增加10 m, Vzmax和Mzmax均降低约15.8% ~ 32.3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
期刊最新文献
The influence of seismic source heterogeneity and local site effects on intensity attenuation during Chilean megathrust earthquakes Reflection characteristics of P1 and S1 waves at the free boundary of saturated frozen soil considering thermal effects Response of model pile-supported bridge to near-fault pulse-type ground motions A comprehensive analysis of the dynamic properties and microscopic mechanisms of natural fiber-reinforced soil Experimental and numerical studies on seismic performance of damaged RC bridge columns repaired using different jacketing materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1