From experiments to organizational change: Learning from urban logistics projects in Groningen and Bergen

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Technological Forecasting and Social Change Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124023
Subina Shrestha , Håvard Haarstad , Ward Rauws , Paul Buijs
{"title":"From experiments to organizational change: Learning from urban logistics projects in Groningen and Bergen","authors":"Subina Shrestha ,&nbsp;Håvard Haarstad ,&nbsp;Ward Rauws ,&nbsp;Paul Buijs","doi":"10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cities are increasingly employing experimentation to address complex sustainability challenges. Experimentation, premised on learning-by-doing, offers organizations the space to test interventions and learn from them. However, it is not clear whether and how experiments bring about organizational changes through learning. This paper seeks to scrutinize the relationship between experimentation, learning, and organizational change, and asks: To what extent does learning from experimentation bring about organizational change? Drawing on the literature on urban governance and sustainability transitions in the context of experimentation and learning, we conduct a cross-case comparison of four urban logistics experiments in the cities of Bergen and Groningen. Our findings show that whilst experiments indeed generate learning, this is not sufficient to bring about organizational change. Learning from the experiments themselves needs to be coupled with persistent relational work within and between organizations, in order to turn experimentation into actual organizational change.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48454,"journal":{"name":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","volume":"213 ","pages":"Article 124023"},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technological Forecasting and Social Change","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016252500054X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cities are increasingly employing experimentation to address complex sustainability challenges. Experimentation, premised on learning-by-doing, offers organizations the space to test interventions and learn from them. However, it is not clear whether and how experiments bring about organizational changes through learning. This paper seeks to scrutinize the relationship between experimentation, learning, and organizational change, and asks: To what extent does learning from experimentation bring about organizational change? Drawing on the literature on urban governance and sustainability transitions in the context of experimentation and learning, we conduct a cross-case comparison of four urban logistics experiments in the cities of Bergen and Groningen. Our findings show that whilst experiments indeed generate learning, this is not sufficient to bring about organizational change. Learning from the experiments themselves needs to be coupled with persistent relational work within and between organizations, in order to turn experimentation into actual organizational change.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从实验到组织变革:从格罗宁根和卑尔根的城市物流项目中学习
城市越来越多地采用实验来解决复杂的可持续性挑战。以“边做边学”为前提的实验为组织提供了测试干预措施并从中学习的空间。然而,实验是否以及如何通过学习带来组织变革尚不清楚。本文试图审视实验、学习和组织变革之间的关系,并提出以下问题:从实验中学习能在多大程度上带来组织变革?在实验和学习的背景下,借鉴有关城市治理和可持续性转型的文献,我们对卑尔根和格罗宁根的四个城市物流实验进行了跨案例比较。我们的研究结果表明,虽然实验确实产生了学习,但这不足以带来组织变革。从实验中学习需要与组织内部和组织之间持久的关系工作相结合,以便将实验转化为实际的组织变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
10.80%
发文量
813
期刊介绍: Technological Forecasting and Social Change is a prominent platform for individuals engaged in the methodology and application of technological forecasting and future studies as planning tools, exploring the interconnectedness of social, environmental, and technological factors. In addition to serving as a key forum for these discussions, we offer numerous benefits for authors, including complimentary PDFs, a generous copyright policy, exclusive discounts on Elsevier publications, and more.
期刊最新文献
The future of digitally enabled circular strategies in manufacturing: A Delphi study Artificial intelligence awareness and career resilience: The mediating role of willingness to protect boundaries in Chinese financial enterprises From patents to predictive analytics: Leveraging R-GCNs for technological opportunity discovery in converging industries AI technology and labor skill transformation: Theoretical and empirical evidence from China Analytical groundwork for circular economy roadmaps based on a soft systems approach: A case study of lithium-ion batteries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1