Constraining O isotope equilibrium exchange between CO2 and water during fluid cycling in a closed system

IF 5.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104314
Sascha Serno , Gareth Johnson , Adrian J. Boyce , Stuart M.V. Gilfillan
{"title":"Constraining O isotope equilibrium exchange between CO2 and water during fluid cycling in a closed system","authors":"Sascha Serno ,&nbsp;Gareth Johnson ,&nbsp;Adrian J. Boyce ,&nbsp;Stuart M.V. Gilfillan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijggc.2025.104314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Residual trapping is a critical component of secure geological CO<sub>2</sub> storage. Quantification of the amount of CO<sub>2</sub> residually trapped plays a key role in predicting CO<sub>2</sub> plume migration, immobilisation and storage security. However, it is difficult to determine pore-space saturation of CO<sub>2</sub> within a subsurface reservoir. δ<sup>18</sup>O of CO<sub>2</sub> and reservoir fluids from a variety of field-scale CO<sub>2</sub> injection settings have provided estimates of in-situ CO<sub>2</sub> reservoir saturations. This is due to O isotope exchange between CO<sub>2</sub> and H<sub>2</sub>O and subsequent changes in δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>H2O</sub> values due to the presence of free phase CO<sub>2</sub>. Here, we present results from laboratory experiments to measure the O isotope equilibration time at ambient conditions and O isotope behaviour in both CO<sub>2</sub> and water during fluid cycling in a closed system. This provides an analogue of O isotopic exchange within a single-well push-pull injection and production scenario and is primarily motivated to help understand varying estimates of the amount of residual trapping obtained from O isotope measurements during the Otway 2Bext single well push-pull test. We find that full O isotope equilibration between CO<sub>2</sub> and water is established after 72 hours and water δ<sup>18</sup>O does not change after 48 hours. The maximum change in δ<sup>18</sup>O of water of 1.16 % during the back-production phase of our fluid cycling experiment using waters enriched in δ<sup>18</sup>O would be negligible in field-scale projects, when unenriched water and CO<sub>2</sub> sources are used, considering standard analytical uncertainties. However, our results show that changes in δ<sup>18</sup>O values of CO<sub>2</sub> during a back-production scenario may be larger than 3.52 %, hence it may be inaccurate to solely use O isotope composition of CO<sub>2</sub> to quantify CO<sub>2</sub> pore-space saturation in a single-well push-pull configuration.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":334,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","volume":"141 ","pages":"Article 104314"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S175058362500012X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residual trapping is a critical component of secure geological CO2 storage. Quantification of the amount of CO2 residually trapped plays a key role in predicting CO2 plume migration, immobilisation and storage security. However, it is difficult to determine pore-space saturation of CO2 within a subsurface reservoir. δ18O of CO2 and reservoir fluids from a variety of field-scale CO2 injection settings have provided estimates of in-situ CO2 reservoir saturations. This is due to O isotope exchange between CO2 and H2O and subsequent changes in δ18OH2O values due to the presence of free phase CO2. Here, we present results from laboratory experiments to measure the O isotope equilibration time at ambient conditions and O isotope behaviour in both CO2 and water during fluid cycling in a closed system. This provides an analogue of O isotopic exchange within a single-well push-pull injection and production scenario and is primarily motivated to help understand varying estimates of the amount of residual trapping obtained from O isotope measurements during the Otway 2Bext single well push-pull test. We find that full O isotope equilibration between CO2 and water is established after 72 hours and water δ18O does not change after 48 hours. The maximum change in δ18O of water of 1.16 % during the back-production phase of our fluid cycling experiment using waters enriched in δ18O would be negligible in field-scale projects, when unenriched water and CO2 sources are used, considering standard analytical uncertainties. However, our results show that changes in δ18O values of CO2 during a back-production scenario may be larger than 3.52 %, hence it may be inaccurate to solely use O isotope composition of CO2 to quantify CO2 pore-space saturation in a single-well push-pull configuration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
封闭系统中流体循环过程中CO2和水之间O同位素平衡交换的约束
残余捕集是二氧化碳安全地质封存的重要组成部分。CO2残留截留量的量化在预测CO2羽流迁移、固定和储存安全性方面起着关键作用。然而,很难确定地下储层中CO2的孔隙空间饱和度。通过各种油田规模的CO2注入环境的CO2和储层流体的δ18O,可以估算出现场CO2储层的饱和度。这是由于CO2和H2O之间的O同位素交换以及随后由于自由相CO2的存在而引起的δ18OH2O值的变化。在这里,我们展示了测量环境条件下O同位素平衡时间和封闭系统中流体循环过程中CO2和水中O同位素行为的实验室实验结果。该方法模拟了单井推拉注入和生产过程中的O同位素交换,主要是为了帮助理解Otway 2Bext单井推拉测试中O同位素测量结果对残余圈闭量的不同估计。我们发现,CO2和水之间的O同位素在72小时后完全平衡,水的δ18O在48小时后没有变化。考虑到标准的分析不确定度,当使用非富集水和CO2源时,在我们的流体循环实验中,在采后阶段使用富含δ18O的水的δ18O的最大变化为1.16%,在现场规模项目中可以忽略不计。然而,我们的研究结果表明,在反采情景中,CO2的δ18O值的变化可能大于3.52%,因此,在单井推拉配置中,仅使用CO2的O同位素组成来量化CO2孔隙空间饱和度可能是不准确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control is a peer reviewed journal focusing on scientific and engineering developments in greenhouse gas control through capture and storage at large stationary emitters in the power sector and in other major resource, manufacturing and production industries. The Journal covers all greenhouse gas emissions within the power and industrial sectors, and comprises both technical and non-technical related literature in one volume. Original research, review and comments papers are included.
期刊最新文献
Multi-operator biogenic CO2 hub linked with electricity and heat markets Maximizing the CO2 storage capacity in the depleted oil reservoirs: A case study of a mature oil field in Cuu Long Basin, Vietnam Cyclic CO2 injection in shale reservoirs: A multiscale non-equilibrium evaluation of recovery and storage Operational study of a 200,000 tonne/yr partial oxy-fuel combustion CO2 capture project for cement production Organic-inorganic carbon cycling: Implications for CO2 mineralization of brucite-bearing mine tailings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1