A comparative study of SPE- and DLLME-based methods for the determination of opioids and benzodiazepines in urine samples using LC–MS/MS

IF 4.9 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Microchemical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-05 DOI:10.1016/j.microc.2024.112354
Pol Clivillé-Cabré , Luana M. Rosendo , Francesc Borrull , Carme Aguilar , Marta Calull
{"title":"A comparative study of SPE- and DLLME-based methods for the determination of opioids and benzodiazepines in urine samples using LC–MS/MS","authors":"Pol Clivillé-Cabré ,&nbsp;Luana M. Rosendo ,&nbsp;Francesc Borrull ,&nbsp;Carme Aguilar ,&nbsp;Marta Calull","doi":"10.1016/j.microc.2024.112354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The determination of drugs of abuse has been gaining increasing attention among the scientific community as drug consumption is considered a major global public health issue. Opioids and benzodiazepines are among the most widely consumed drugs worldwide. Analytical methods for their determination, particularly in urine matrices, primarily rely on chromatographic techniques. However, due to the complexity of the matrix and the low concentration levels at which these drugs are usually present (in the ng/L or µg/L range), efficient sample pre-treatment strategies are essential. This step is of significant importance in the development of environmentally friendly analytical methods. For this reason, in recent years, pre-treatment techniques have been developed based on green analytical chemical principles to address this need.</div><div>In this context, we present a comparative study of solid phase extraction (SPE) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) for the determination of a group of benzodiazepines and opioids in urine samples using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The method, based on SPE, was developed using ExtraBond SCX as the sorbent and 7 mL of 5 % of NH<sub>4</sub>OH in methanol as the elution solvent, yielding recoveries ranging from 9 to 107 %. The DLLME method used 200 µL of chloroform and 500 µL of ethyl acetate as extractant and dispersant solvents, respectively, achieving recoveries between 14 and 86 %. The DLLME strategy proved to be greener than the SPE method in line with the principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC), as it required lower volumes of solvents, a shorter extraction time, and less energy consumption than the SPE method. Both methods were validated using urine matrices and subsequently applied to 11 urine specimens from women participating in detoxification programmes, confirming the suitability of these methods in toxicological and forensic analyses. The results showed that methadone and diazepam were the most frequently determined compounds, and a trend of polyconsumption was observed in most of the samples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":391,"journal":{"name":"Microchemical Journal","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 112354"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microchemical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026265X24024676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The determination of drugs of abuse has been gaining increasing attention among the scientific community as drug consumption is considered a major global public health issue. Opioids and benzodiazepines are among the most widely consumed drugs worldwide. Analytical methods for their determination, particularly in urine matrices, primarily rely on chromatographic techniques. However, due to the complexity of the matrix and the low concentration levels at which these drugs are usually present (in the ng/L or µg/L range), efficient sample pre-treatment strategies are essential. This step is of significant importance in the development of environmentally friendly analytical methods. For this reason, in recent years, pre-treatment techniques have been developed based on green analytical chemical principles to address this need.
In this context, we present a comparative study of solid phase extraction (SPE) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) for the determination of a group of benzodiazepines and opioids in urine samples using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The method, based on SPE, was developed using ExtraBond SCX as the sorbent and 7 mL of 5 % of NH4OH in methanol as the elution solvent, yielding recoveries ranging from 9 to 107 %. The DLLME method used 200 µL of chloroform and 500 µL of ethyl acetate as extractant and dispersant solvents, respectively, achieving recoveries between 14 and 86 %. The DLLME strategy proved to be greener than the SPE method in line with the principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC), as it required lower volumes of solvents, a shorter extraction time, and less energy consumption than the SPE method. Both methods were validated using urine matrices and subsequently applied to 11 urine specimens from women participating in detoxification programmes, confirming the suitability of these methods in toxicological and forensic analyses. The results showed that methadone and diazepam were the most frequently determined compounds, and a trend of polyconsumption was observed in most of the samples.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液相色谱-质谱联用(LC-MS /MS)测定尿液中阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物的比较研究
由于毒品消费被认为是一个重大的全球公共卫生问题,对滥用药物的确定日益受到科学界的关注。阿片类药物和苯二氮卓类药物是世界上使用最广泛的药物。分析方法的测定,特别是在尿液基质,主要依赖于色谱技术。然而,由于基质的复杂性和这些药物通常存在的低浓度水平(在ng/L或µg/L范围内),有效的样品预处理策略是必不可少的。这一步对发展环境友好的分析方法具有重要意义。因此,近年来,基于绿色分析化学原理的预处理技术得到了发展,以满足这一需求。在这种背景下,我们提出了固相萃取(SPE)和分散液液微萃取(DLLME)的对比研究,用于液相色谱-串联质谱(LC-MS /MS)测定尿液样品中的一组苯二氮卓类药物和阿片类药物。以ExtraBond SCX为吸附剂,以5%的NH4OH水溶液为洗脱溶剂,采用固相萃取法,回收率为9% ~ 107%。DLLME法分别以200µL氯仿和500µL乙酸乙酯为萃取剂和分散剂,回收率为14% ~ 86%。DLLME策略被证明比SPE方法更环保,符合绿色分析化学(GAC)的原则,因为它比SPE方法需要更少的溶剂量,更短的提取时间和更少的能源消耗。使用尿液基质验证了这两种方法,并随后将其应用于参加戒毒计划的11名妇女的尿液标本,证实了这些方法在毒理学和法医分析中的适用性。结果表明,美沙酮和地西泮是检出频率最高的两种化合物,且多数样品中存在多用的趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microchemical Journal
Microchemical Journal 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1131
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The Microchemical Journal is a peer reviewed journal devoted to all aspects and phases of analytical chemistry and chemical analysis. The Microchemical Journal publishes articles which are at the forefront of modern analytical chemistry and cover innovations in the techniques to the finest possible limits. This includes fundamental aspects, instrumentation, new developments, innovative and novel methods and applications including environmental and clinical field. Traditional classical analytical methods such as spectrophotometry and titrimetry as well as established instrumentation methods such as flame and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, gas chromatography, and modified glassy or carbon electrode electrochemical methods will be considered, provided they show significant improvements and novelty compared to the established methods.
期刊最新文献
Electrochemical sensing platform for the detection of breath CO and NO: towards non-invasive monitoring of inflammatory biomarkers Rolling two-shot RSD of major element emission as a diagnostic tool for LIBS in-depth quantification in heterogeneous cultural heritage materials Ultrasensitive LC-MS analysis of saccharides using 2-hydrazinyl-6-methoxy-1,3-benzothiazole as a novel derivatization reagent From densitometer to smartphone: a sustainable TLC evolution for pharmacokinetic study of deferasirox concurrently used with pantoprazole; appraisal of method whiteness and greenness Single ratio-probe based multichannel sensor integrated with paper-based smartphone platform for pattern recognition of tetracyclines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1