A comparative study of SPE- and DLLME-based methods for the determination of opioids and benzodiazepines in urine samples using LC–MS/MS

IF 4.9 2区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Microchemical Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.microc.2024.112354
Pol Clivillé-Cabré , Luana M. Rosendo , Francesc Borrull , Carme Aguilar , Marta Calull
{"title":"A comparative study of SPE- and DLLME-based methods for the determination of opioids and benzodiazepines in urine samples using LC–MS/MS","authors":"Pol Clivillé-Cabré ,&nbsp;Luana M. Rosendo ,&nbsp;Francesc Borrull ,&nbsp;Carme Aguilar ,&nbsp;Marta Calull","doi":"10.1016/j.microc.2024.112354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The determination of drugs of abuse has been gaining increasing attention among the scientific community as drug consumption is considered a major global public health issue. Opioids and benzodiazepines are among the most widely consumed drugs worldwide. Analytical methods for their determination, particularly in urine matrices, primarily rely on chromatographic techniques. However, due to the complexity of the matrix and the low concentration levels at which these drugs are usually present (in the ng/L or µg/L range), efficient sample pre-treatment strategies are essential. This step is of significant importance in the development of environmentally friendly analytical methods. For this reason, in recent years, pre-treatment techniques have been developed based on green analytical chemical principles to address this need.</div><div>In this context, we present a comparative study of solid phase extraction (SPE) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) for the determination of a group of benzodiazepines and opioids in urine samples using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The method, based on SPE, was developed using ExtraBond SCX as the sorbent and 7 mL of 5 % of NH<sub>4</sub>OH in methanol as the elution solvent, yielding recoveries ranging from 9 to 107 %. The DLLME method used 200 µL of chloroform and 500 µL of ethyl acetate as extractant and dispersant solvents, respectively, achieving recoveries between 14 and 86 %. The DLLME strategy proved to be greener than the SPE method in line with the principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC), as it required lower volumes of solvents, a shorter extraction time, and less energy consumption than the SPE method. Both methods were validated using urine matrices and subsequently applied to 11 urine specimens from women participating in detoxification programmes, confirming the suitability of these methods in toxicological and forensic analyses. The results showed that methadone and diazepam were the most frequently determined compounds, and a trend of polyconsumption was observed in most of the samples.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":391,"journal":{"name":"Microchemical Journal","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 112354"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microchemical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0026265X24024676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The determination of drugs of abuse has been gaining increasing attention among the scientific community as drug consumption is considered a major global public health issue. Opioids and benzodiazepines are among the most widely consumed drugs worldwide. Analytical methods for their determination, particularly in urine matrices, primarily rely on chromatographic techniques. However, due to the complexity of the matrix and the low concentration levels at which these drugs are usually present (in the ng/L or µg/L range), efficient sample pre-treatment strategies are essential. This step is of significant importance in the development of environmentally friendly analytical methods. For this reason, in recent years, pre-treatment techniques have been developed based on green analytical chemical principles to address this need.
In this context, we present a comparative study of solid phase extraction (SPE) and dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction (DLLME) for the determination of a group of benzodiazepines and opioids in urine samples using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC–MS/MS). The method, based on SPE, was developed using ExtraBond SCX as the sorbent and 7 mL of 5 % of NH4OH in methanol as the elution solvent, yielding recoveries ranging from 9 to 107 %. The DLLME method used 200 µL of chloroform and 500 µL of ethyl acetate as extractant and dispersant solvents, respectively, achieving recoveries between 14 and 86 %. The DLLME strategy proved to be greener than the SPE method in line with the principles of green analytical chemistry (GAC), as it required lower volumes of solvents, a shorter extraction time, and less energy consumption than the SPE method. Both methods were validated using urine matrices and subsequently applied to 11 urine specimens from women participating in detoxification programmes, confirming the suitability of these methods in toxicological and forensic analyses. The results showed that methadone and diazepam were the most frequently determined compounds, and a trend of polyconsumption was observed in most of the samples.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Microchemical Journal
Microchemical Journal 化学-分析化学
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
1131
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The Microchemical Journal is a peer reviewed journal devoted to all aspects and phases of analytical chemistry and chemical analysis. The Microchemical Journal publishes articles which are at the forefront of modern analytical chemistry and cover innovations in the techniques to the finest possible limits. This includes fundamental aspects, instrumentation, new developments, innovative and novel methods and applications including environmental and clinical field. Traditional classical analytical methods such as spectrophotometry and titrimetry as well as established instrumentation methods such as flame and graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry, gas chromatography, and modified glassy or carbon electrode electrochemical methods will be considered, provided they show significant improvements and novelty compared to the established methods.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Handling non-linearities and pre-processing in multivariate calibration of vibrational spectra Novel carbon paste sensor modified with MWCNT and Ca-doped ZnO nanocomposite for therapeutic monitoring of Favipiravir in COVID-19 patients Search for the smallest switch-on, water soluble and a phase-sensitive fluorimetric probe for lipid membranes: N-aryl isoindolin-1-one core Simple and rapid paper-based colorimetric spot test for promethazine screening in recreational drug beverages and pharmaceuticals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1