Multi-level optimisation of feature extraction networks for concrete surface crack detection

IF 6.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Developments in the Built Environment Pub Date : 2024-12-15 DOI:10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100587
Faris Elghaish , Sandra Matarneh , Farzad Pour Rahimian , Essam Abdellatef , David Edwards , Obuks Ejohwomu , Mohammed Abdelmegid , Chansik Park
{"title":"Multi-level optimisation of feature extraction networks for concrete surface crack detection","authors":"Faris Elghaish ,&nbsp;Sandra Matarneh ,&nbsp;Farzad Pour Rahimian ,&nbsp;Essam Abdellatef ,&nbsp;David Edwards ,&nbsp;Obuks Ejohwomu ,&nbsp;Mohammed Abdelmegid ,&nbsp;Chansik Park","doi":"10.1016/j.dibe.2024.100587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the increasing utilisation of deep learning (DL) for detecting and classifying distress in concrete surfaces, the demand for accurate and precise models has risen. This study proposes a novel empirical approach of multilayer optimisation for two prominent DL models, namely ResNet101 and Xception, to classify distress in concrete surfaces. Both models were trained using 20,000 images depicting various types of cracks and tested with another set of 20,000 images. Four algorithms (Sequential Motion Optimisation (SMO), shuffled frog-leaping algorithm (SFLA), grey wolf optimisation (GWO), walrus optimisation (WO)) were then applied to enhance classification accuracy. After evaluating the DL models’ overall performance, the four algorithms were grouped into two layers. The first layer comprised SMO, SFLA, GWO and their combined application. Subsequently, the second stage implemented the WO optimiser to enhance performance further. The outcomes demonstrated a substantial positive impact on the accuracy of both CNN models. Specifically, ResNet101 achieved 98.9% accuracy and Xception reached 99.2% accuracy. In the accuracy breakdown, ResNet101 achieved 97.6% accuracy and Xception achieved 98.3% accuracy in the first stage, compared to 87.4% for Xception and 83.1% for ResNet101 before optimisation. Given that this approach achieves over 99% accuracy in detecting cracks on concrete surfaces, it offers a significant improvement in the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of structural health surveys for large buildings. Furthermore, it provides structural engineers with precise data to accurately determine and implement the required maintenance actions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34137,"journal":{"name":"Developments in the Built Environment","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100587"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developments in the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666165924002680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing utilisation of deep learning (DL) for detecting and classifying distress in concrete surfaces, the demand for accurate and precise models has risen. This study proposes a novel empirical approach of multilayer optimisation for two prominent DL models, namely ResNet101 and Xception, to classify distress in concrete surfaces. Both models were trained using 20,000 images depicting various types of cracks and tested with another set of 20,000 images. Four algorithms (Sequential Motion Optimisation (SMO), shuffled frog-leaping algorithm (SFLA), grey wolf optimisation (GWO), walrus optimisation (WO)) were then applied to enhance classification accuracy. After evaluating the DL models’ overall performance, the four algorithms were grouped into two layers. The first layer comprised SMO, SFLA, GWO and their combined application. Subsequently, the second stage implemented the WO optimiser to enhance performance further. The outcomes demonstrated a substantial positive impact on the accuracy of both CNN models. Specifically, ResNet101 achieved 98.9% accuracy and Xception reached 99.2% accuracy. In the accuracy breakdown, ResNet101 achieved 97.6% accuracy and Xception achieved 98.3% accuracy in the first stage, compared to 87.4% for Xception and 83.1% for ResNet101 before optimisation. Given that this approach achieves over 99% accuracy in detecting cracks on concrete surfaces, it offers a significant improvement in the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of structural health surveys for large buildings. Furthermore, it provides structural engineers with precise data to accurately determine and implement the required maintenance actions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Developments in the Built Environment (DIBE) is a recently established peer-reviewed gold open access journal, ensuring that all accepted articles are permanently and freely accessible. Focused on civil engineering and the built environment, DIBE publishes original papers and short communications. Encompassing topics such as construction materials and building sustainability, the journal adopts a holistic approach with the aim of benefiting the community.
期刊最新文献
Mapping the digital transformation of AEC industry: Content analysis of digital public policy in China Bias-aware degradation models for reinforced concrete bridges based on XAI Behavioral analysis of steel I-beams under repeated dynamic loads: Impact of various impactor head types Robotic assembly of modular concrete shells using falsework Development and evaluation of a maturity assessment tool for integrating building information modelling into operations and maintenance phase of buildings
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1