Impact of carbapenem-resistant infections on mortality in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A comparison with hypoxemia severity – An observational study

IF 2.3 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-22 DOI:10.1016/j.cegh.2025.101947
Thejesh Srinivas , Shwethapriya R , Gagana Hanumaiah , Pratibha Todur , Souvik Chaudhuri , Ganesh Paramasivam , Prithvishree Ravindra , Vinutha R. Bhat , Sagar Shanmukhappa Maddani , Shobha U. Kamath , Danavath Nagendra , Vishwas P , Likith Hanumaiah , Pratik Paran Medhi , Prabha Prakash
{"title":"Impact of carbapenem-resistant infections on mortality in mechanically ventilated acute respiratory distress syndrome patients: A comparison with hypoxemia severity – An observational study","authors":"Thejesh Srinivas ,&nbsp;Shwethapriya R ,&nbsp;Gagana Hanumaiah ,&nbsp;Pratibha Todur ,&nbsp;Souvik Chaudhuri ,&nbsp;Ganesh Paramasivam ,&nbsp;Prithvishree Ravindra ,&nbsp;Vinutha R. Bhat ,&nbsp;Sagar Shanmukhappa Maddani ,&nbsp;Shobha U. Kamath ,&nbsp;Danavath Nagendra ,&nbsp;Vishwas P ,&nbsp;Likith Hanumaiah ,&nbsp;Pratik Paran Medhi ,&nbsp;Prabha Prakash","doi":"10.1016/j.cegh.2025.101947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>There has been a shift in predicting adverse outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from pulmonary to extra-pulmonary organ dysfunction. With rising multi-drug resistance, carbapenem-resistant infections (CRI) may complicate ARDS. The significance of CRI as an outcome predictor is crucial. This study aimed to assess the impact of CRI in ARDS patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This secondary analysis included 355 adult ARDS patients on invasive mechanical ventilation from two prospective observational studies conducted between September 2020 and July 2024 at a single-center tertiary care facility. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Demographic details, organ dysfunction scores, oxygenation values, ARDS classification based on the Berlin criteria, inflammatory biomarkers, and ICU outcomes were noted from clinical records. Patients’ culture sensitivity reports were reviewed for CRI, and the association of CRI with mortality outcomes was analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses and artificial neural network model, were employed to analyze mortality outcomes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>CRI was present in 32.9 % of ARDS patients. Multivariable logistic regression identified CRI as an independent predictor of ICU mortality (P-value&lt;0.001, adjusted OR 3.13, 95%CI [1.752–5.588]). Artificial neural network analysis showed that acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and CRI had the normalized importance (100 %, 84.5 %, and 83.4 %, respectively) in predicting mortality. Independent predictors—CRI, APACHE II score ≥ 17, and SOFA score ≥9—were combined to create the “CARAS” categorization, which had a higher mortality (76.6 %, P-value&lt;0.001). Mortality in mild-moderate ARDS with CRI was 59.4 % versus 41.1 % without CRI (P-value = 0.013, Chi-Square test).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>CRI is an independent predictor of mortality in ARDS patients, compared to hypoxemia severity. “CARAS” positive patients (CRI with APACHE II score ≥17 and SOFA score ≥9) had significantly higher mortality than non-CARAS. CRI significantly increases mortality in mild-moderate ARDS compared to increase in mortality in severe ARDS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46404,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","volume":"32 ","pages":"Article 101947"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213398425000363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

There has been a shift in predicting adverse outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) from pulmonary to extra-pulmonary organ dysfunction. With rising multi-drug resistance, carbapenem-resistant infections (CRI) may complicate ARDS. The significance of CRI as an outcome predictor is crucial. This study aimed to assess the impact of CRI in ARDS patients.

Methods

This secondary analysis included 355 adult ARDS patients on invasive mechanical ventilation from two prospective observational studies conducted between September 2020 and July 2024 at a single-center tertiary care facility. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. Demographic details, organ dysfunction scores, oxygenation values, ARDS classification based on the Berlin criteria, inflammatory biomarkers, and ICU outcomes were noted from clinical records. Patients’ culture sensitivity reports were reviewed for CRI, and the association of CRI with mortality outcomes was analyzed. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses and artificial neural network model, were employed to analyze mortality outcomes.

Results

CRI was present in 32.9 % of ARDS patients. Multivariable logistic regression identified CRI as an independent predictor of ICU mortality (P-value<0.001, adjusted OR 3.13, 95%CI [1.752–5.588]). Artificial neural network analysis showed that acute physiology and chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score, sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, and CRI had the normalized importance (100 %, 84.5 %, and 83.4 %, respectively) in predicting mortality. Independent predictors—CRI, APACHE II score ≥ 17, and SOFA score ≥9—were combined to create the “CARAS” categorization, which had a higher mortality (76.6 %, P-value<0.001). Mortality in mild-moderate ARDS with CRI was 59.4 % versus 41.1 % without CRI (P-value = 0.013, Chi-Square test).

Conclusion

CRI is an independent predictor of mortality in ARDS patients, compared to hypoxemia severity. “CARAS” positive patients (CRI with APACHE II score ≥17 and SOFA score ≥9) had significantly higher mortality than non-CARAS. CRI significantly increases mortality in mild-moderate ARDS compared to increase in mortality in severe ARDS.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health
Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
218
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health (CEGH) is a multidisciplinary journal and it is published four times (March, June, September, December) a year. The mandate of CEGH is to promote articles on clinical epidemiology with focus on developing countries in the context of global health. We also accept articles from other countries. It publishes original research work across all disciplines of medicine and allied sciences, related to clinical epidemiology and global health. The journal publishes Original articles, Review articles, Evidence Summaries, Letters to the Editor. All articles published in CEGH are peer-reviewed and published online for immediate access and citation.
期刊最新文献
Celiac disease and COVID-19: Leveraging health registries for crucial insights and public health strategies Geospatial insights into chronic bronchitis: Evaluating hotspots and environmental factors in MUDHRA-cohort of Mysuru district, India Harnessing ensemble deep learning models for precise detection of gynaecological cancers Prevalence and mortality of infective endocarditis in Kazakhstan: A nationwide epidemiological study (2018–2022) Assessment of 2021 surveillance system for under-five children with pneumonia in Bantul Regency, Indonesia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1