AGLFuzz: Automata-Guided Fuzzing for detecting logic errors in security protocol implementations

IF 4.8 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Computers & Security Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cose.2024.103979
Dongliang Zhao, Jiaxing Guo, Chunxiang Gu, Yonghui Zheng, Xieli Zhang
{"title":"AGLFuzz: Automata-Guided Fuzzing for detecting logic errors in security protocol implementations","authors":"Dongliang Zhao,&nbsp;Jiaxing Guo,&nbsp;Chunxiang Gu,&nbsp;Yonghui Zheng,&nbsp;Xieli Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.cose.2024.103979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Security protocols are crucial for ensuring communication security and safeguarding data integrity in computer networks and distributed systems. The complexity of security protocol logic, coupled with implementation challenges, often results in protocol implementations failing to satisfy the security requirements due to logical errors. Unlike memory-related bugs, logical errors do not exhibit fixed patterns or behaviors, thereby rendering them especially challenging to detect. Therefore, we propose a logic error detection method based on blackbox fuzzing. This method takes protocol interaction behavior as atomic proposition, utilizes linear temporal logic on finite traces (<span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mi>T</mi><msub><mrow><mi>L</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>) to express expected properties. Logical errors are identified according to whether the abstract interaction sequence extracted from the fuzz data can be accepted by the automata corresponding to the <span><math><mrow><mi>L</mi><mi>T</mi><msub><mrow><mi>L</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>f</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span> property. Furthermore, we design an automata-guided fuzz testing algorithm that leverages the state information of automatas to drive test sequence generation, thereby accelerating the error search process. To support this method, a general-purpose black-box fuzz testing framework, AGLFuzz, has been implemented, currently including testing modules for the TLS1.3 and IPsec protocol implementations. Experimental evaluations on several widely used TLS1.3 and IPsec protocol implementations have led to the discovery of multiple counterexamples that violated specific properties and vulnerabilities that could cause the target to crash. Notably, three of these vulnerabilities have been assigned CVE numbers, highlighting the effectiveness of the proposed method.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51004,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Security","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 103979"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Security","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167404824002840","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Security protocols are crucial for ensuring communication security and safeguarding data integrity in computer networks and distributed systems. The complexity of security protocol logic, coupled with implementation challenges, often results in protocol implementations failing to satisfy the security requirements due to logical errors. Unlike memory-related bugs, logical errors do not exhibit fixed patterns or behaviors, thereby rendering them especially challenging to detect. Therefore, we propose a logic error detection method based on blackbox fuzzing. This method takes protocol interaction behavior as atomic proposition, utilizes linear temporal logic on finite traces (LTLf) to express expected properties. Logical errors are identified according to whether the abstract interaction sequence extracted from the fuzz data can be accepted by the automata corresponding to the LTLf property. Furthermore, we design an automata-guided fuzz testing algorithm that leverages the state information of automatas to drive test sequence generation, thereby accelerating the error search process. To support this method, a general-purpose black-box fuzz testing framework, AGLFuzz, has been implemented, currently including testing modules for the TLS1.3 and IPsec protocol implementations. Experimental evaluations on several widely used TLS1.3 and IPsec protocol implementations have led to the discovery of multiple counterexamples that violated specific properties and vulnerabilities that could cause the target to crash. Notably, three of these vulnerabilities have been assigned CVE numbers, highlighting the effectiveness of the proposed method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Security
Computers & Security 工程技术-计算机:信息系统
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
365
审稿时长
10.7 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Security is the most respected technical journal in the IT security field. With its high-profile editorial board and informative regular features and columns, the journal is essential reading for IT security professionals around the world. Computers & Security provides you with a unique blend of leading edge research and sound practical management advice. It is aimed at the professional involved with computer security, audit, control and data integrity in all sectors - industry, commerce and academia. Recognized worldwide as THE primary source of reference for applied research and technical expertise it is your first step to fully secure systems.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board AGLFuzz: Automata-Guided Fuzzing for detecting logic errors in security protocol implementations ATSDetector: An Android Trojan spyware detection approach with multi-features Towards prompt tuning-based software vulnerability assessment with continual learning Cyberattack event logs classification using deep learning with semantic feature analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1