Analyzing the interplay between money supply, mineral extraction, industrialization, and ecological footprint in latin America's global south: A symmetrical perspective

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Resources Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105422
Waqas Amin , Shouhong Xie , Abdul Rauf
{"title":"Analyzing the interplay between money supply, mineral extraction, industrialization, and ecological footprint in latin America's global south: A symmetrical perspective","authors":"Waqas Amin ,&nbsp;Shouhong Xie ,&nbsp;Abdul Rauf","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2024.105422","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The primary goal of this study is to examine the long-term impact of money supply, natural resource use, mineral extraction, industrialization, green energy use, and population density on the ecological footprint (EFP) in 11 high natural resource–based Latin American Global South nations from 1990 to 2021. The study employs Westerlund bootstrap LM, pooled mean group autoregressive distributed lag (PMG-ARDL), and Dumitrescu and Hurlin causality tests. Initially, Westerlund Bootstrap LM statistics reveal significant evidence of cointegration among the variables. Second, the PMG model results show that all regressors except green energy use have a significant positive effect on EFP in the long run, whereas, in the short run, all variables are found to have insignificant impact, excluding green energy use and industrialization. Finally, Dumitrescu and Hurlin tests indicate unidirectional causality of all the regressors with EFP, except mineral extraction and population density. The findings reveal some valuable policy implications for reducing EFP. Initially, central banks must initially limit money supply while altering the interest rate minimally. Over time, central banks must also promote green lending practices in industrial production sectors and charge higher interest on loans to firms that use outdated technology in industrial production. Furthermore, firms engaged in mineral and natural resource extraction must replace old equipment with new technologies that use green energy to curtail pollution emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"100 ","pages":"Article 105422"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030142072400789X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary goal of this study is to examine the long-term impact of money supply, natural resource use, mineral extraction, industrialization, green energy use, and population density on the ecological footprint (EFP) in 11 high natural resource–based Latin American Global South nations from 1990 to 2021. The study employs Westerlund bootstrap LM, pooled mean group autoregressive distributed lag (PMG-ARDL), and Dumitrescu and Hurlin causality tests. Initially, Westerlund Bootstrap LM statistics reveal significant evidence of cointegration among the variables. Second, the PMG model results show that all regressors except green energy use have a significant positive effect on EFP in the long run, whereas, in the short run, all variables are found to have insignificant impact, excluding green energy use and industrialization. Finally, Dumitrescu and Hurlin tests indicate unidirectional causality of all the regressors with EFP, except mineral extraction and population density. The findings reveal some valuable policy implications for reducing EFP. Initially, central banks must initially limit money supply while altering the interest rate minimally. Over time, central banks must also promote green lending practices in industrial production sectors and charge higher interest on loans to firms that use outdated technology in industrial production. Furthermore, firms engaged in mineral and natural resource extraction must replace old equipment with new technologies that use green energy to curtail pollution emissions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
期刊最新文献
Effects of economic complexity and metallic mineral resources on renewable energy transition in developing countries Green taxes innovation and energy imports in advancing renewable transitions in developing countries Impact of emerging technologies on corporate social responsibility in mining industry Natural resources dependence and climate vulnerability: Do women's political empowerment and political ideology make the difference? Circular economy in the mining industry: A bibliometric and systematic literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1