{"title":"Foreign aid volatility and institutional development","authors":"Alice Iannantuoni","doi":"10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106690","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Existing explanations for why foreign aid can fail to achieve its objectives tend to highlight issues that have roots in recipient countries, <em>e.g.</em>, corruption, misappropriation of aid funds. In this paper, I turn the focus to a source of inefficiency that is largely donor-driven: the volatility of foreign aid flows. I argue that aid volatility hinders the development of high-quality institutions in recipient countries. Unpredictable, highly variable aid flows make it difficult for recipient governments to allocate resources across government agencies, to set an efficient tax policy, and to easily coordinate with nongovernmental and civil society organizations about the specific goods and services they will provide. I conceptualize aid volatility as <em>variability</em> — the extent to which the aid flows a country receives vary from year to year; and <em>unpredictability</em> — the extent to which recipients are not able to predict the aid they should expect to receive in upcoming years. I propose measures of aid unpredictability and aid variability, leveraging both a time-series approach and the residuals of a predictive model of aid disbursements. I show evidence that the experience of greater aid volatility over time is associated with worse institutional quality outcomes. These adverse effects of aid volatility on institutional development seem to be particularly strong for more highly aid-dependent recipient countries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48463,"journal":{"name":"World Development","volume":"189 ","pages":"Article 106690"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Development","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X24001608","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Existing explanations for why foreign aid can fail to achieve its objectives tend to highlight issues that have roots in recipient countries, e.g., corruption, misappropriation of aid funds. In this paper, I turn the focus to a source of inefficiency that is largely donor-driven: the volatility of foreign aid flows. I argue that aid volatility hinders the development of high-quality institutions in recipient countries. Unpredictable, highly variable aid flows make it difficult for recipient governments to allocate resources across government agencies, to set an efficient tax policy, and to easily coordinate with nongovernmental and civil society organizations about the specific goods and services they will provide. I conceptualize aid volatility as variability — the extent to which the aid flows a country receives vary from year to year; and unpredictability — the extent to which recipients are not able to predict the aid they should expect to receive in upcoming years. I propose measures of aid unpredictability and aid variability, leveraging both a time-series approach and the residuals of a predictive model of aid disbursements. I show evidence that the experience of greater aid volatility over time is associated with worse institutional quality outcomes. These adverse effects of aid volatility on institutional development seem to be particularly strong for more highly aid-dependent recipient countries.
期刊介绍:
World Development is a multi-disciplinary monthly journal of development studies. It seeks to explore ways of improving standards of living, and the human condition generally, by examining potential solutions to problems such as: poverty, unemployment, malnutrition, disease, lack of shelter, environmental degradation, inadequate scientific and technological resources, trade and payments imbalances, international debt, gender and ethnic discrimination, militarism and civil conflict, and lack of popular participation in economic and political life. Contributions offer constructive ideas and analysis, and highlight the lessons to be learned from the experiences of different nations, societies, and economies.