Qingmin Shi , Xinyue Zhao , Shuangming Wang , Hongchao Zhao , Ruijun Ji , Chunhao Li , Bingyang Kou , Jun Zhao
{"title":"Differences in pyrolysis behavior and volatiles of tar-rich coal with various origins","authors":"Qingmin Shi , Xinyue Zhao , Shuangming Wang , Hongchao Zhao , Ruijun Ji , Chunhao Li , Bingyang Kou , Jun Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.fuproc.2025.108181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Abundant in northwest China, tar-rich coal exhibits significantly diverse pyrolysis behaviors depending on its origins. For low-temperature pyrolysis experiments, three coal-forming environments were selected: limno-telmatic (Sample S-1), wet forest swamp (Sample O-1), and dry forest swamp (Sample O-2). The pyrolysis behavior and the molecular structure evolution were analyzed through thermogravimetric, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, gas chromatography, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometer. The findings revealed three stages of pyrolysis behavior in tar-rich coal. Compared to others, S-1, formed in a stronger reducing environment, had a 17 °C lower initial pyrolysis temperature, a 5 °C lower peak reaction temperature, and a 20 % higher weight loss. The reason for S-1 had more bonds with lower energies, accounting for 76 % of the total fragmented bonds, which was 10 % higher than others. Moreover, S-1 contained more highly reactive molecular structures and exhibited higher thermal decomposition. The variations in molecular structure and pyrolysis behavior were reflected in the pyrolysis products, with S-1 showing higher yields of tar, gas, and water, but lower semi-coke. Specifically, it had 2 % higher aliphatics and aromatics and 4 % fewer oxygenated compounds, along with higher levels of CO and CO<sub>2</sub>, and lower amounts of H<sub>2</sub>, CH<sub>4</sub>, and C<sub>n</sub>H<sub>m</sub> in volatiles.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":326,"journal":{"name":"Fuel Processing Technology","volume":"268 ","pages":"Article 108181"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel Processing Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378382025000050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abundant in northwest China, tar-rich coal exhibits significantly diverse pyrolysis behaviors depending on its origins. For low-temperature pyrolysis experiments, three coal-forming environments were selected: limno-telmatic (Sample S-1), wet forest swamp (Sample O-1), and dry forest swamp (Sample O-2). The pyrolysis behavior and the molecular structure evolution were analyzed through thermogravimetric, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, gas chromatography, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometer. The findings revealed three stages of pyrolysis behavior in tar-rich coal. Compared to others, S-1, formed in a stronger reducing environment, had a 17 °C lower initial pyrolysis temperature, a 5 °C lower peak reaction temperature, and a 20 % higher weight loss. The reason for S-1 had more bonds with lower energies, accounting for 76 % of the total fragmented bonds, which was 10 % higher than others. Moreover, S-1 contained more highly reactive molecular structures and exhibited higher thermal decomposition. The variations in molecular structure and pyrolysis behavior were reflected in the pyrolysis products, with S-1 showing higher yields of tar, gas, and water, but lower semi-coke. Specifically, it had 2 % higher aliphatics and aromatics and 4 % fewer oxygenated compounds, along with higher levels of CO and CO2, and lower amounts of H2, CH4, and CnHm in volatiles.
期刊介绍:
Fuel Processing Technology (FPT) deals with the scientific and technological aspects of converting fossil and renewable resources to clean fuels, value-added chemicals, fuel-related advanced carbon materials and by-products. In addition to the traditional non-nuclear fossil fuels, biomass and wastes, papers on the integration of renewables such as solar and wind energy and energy storage into the fuel processing processes, as well as papers on the production and conversion of non-carbon-containing fuels such as hydrogen and ammonia, are also welcome. While chemical conversion is emphasized, papers on advanced physical conversion processes are also considered for publication in FPT. Papers on the fundamental aspects of fuel structure and properties will also be considered.