Juan David Rivera-Niquepa , Paulo M. De Oliveira-De Jesus , Jose M. Yusta
{"title":"Trend-based multi-period decomposition and decoupling methodology for energy-related carbon dioxide emissions: A case study of Portugal","authors":"Juan David Rivera-Niquepa , Paulo M. De Oliveira-De Jesus , Jose M. Yusta","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Governments worldwide are pursuing public policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while sustaining economic growth. Several methodologies, including the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition, Tapio decoupling analysis, and the decoupling effort method, have been employed to analyze energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. These approaches have been applied across various time frames: single-period, year-by-year, and multi-period analyses. However, previous studies have often overlooked significant trend changes in the indicators. This study introduces a methodology that integrates decomposition and decoupling analysis within a multi-period time frame, explicitly accounting for major trend shifts in the carbon dioxide time series. The time frame is defined using a total mean squared error (TMSE) minimization approach. The decomposition analysis employs the additive LMDI method, while the decoupling analysis utilizes the Tapio and decoupling effort models. A case study of Portugal’s carbon dioxide emissions from 1995 to 2020, disaggregated into six energy-consuming sectors, demonstrates the effectiveness of this methodology. The results highlight the substantial impact of carbon intensity, particularly in the electricity and heat sectors. This study demonstrates that accounting for trend changes in period selection provides critical insights, enabling a more thorough and accurate analysis of carbon dioxide emissions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101863"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001577","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Governments worldwide are pursuing public policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions while sustaining economic growth. Several methodologies, including the Logarithmic Mean Divisia Index (LMDI) decomposition, Tapio decoupling analysis, and the decoupling effort method, have been employed to analyze energy-related carbon dioxide emissions. These approaches have been applied across various time frames: single-period, year-by-year, and multi-period analyses. However, previous studies have often overlooked significant trend changes in the indicators. This study introduces a methodology that integrates decomposition and decoupling analysis within a multi-period time frame, explicitly accounting for major trend shifts in the carbon dioxide time series. The time frame is defined using a total mean squared error (TMSE) minimization approach. The decomposition analysis employs the additive LMDI method, while the decoupling analysis utilizes the Tapio and decoupling effort models. A case study of Portugal’s carbon dioxide emissions from 1995 to 2020, disaggregated into six energy-consuming sectors, demonstrates the effectiveness of this methodology. The results highlight the substantial impact of carbon intensity, particularly in the electricity and heat sectors. This study demonstrates that accounting for trend changes in period selection provides critical insights, enabling a more thorough and accurate analysis of carbon dioxide emissions.
期刊介绍:
Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services.
Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.