A clustering scheme for performance benchmarking in the regulation of electric distribution utilities in Iran

IF 3.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Utilities Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jup.2024.101881
Mohammad Pourheydari , Mahyar Gholizadeh , Shakiba Sadeghi , Ashkan Hojjati , Fatemeh Goltapeh
{"title":"A clustering scheme for performance benchmarking in the regulation of electric distribution utilities in Iran","authors":"Mohammad Pourheydari ,&nbsp;Mahyar Gholizadeh ,&nbsp;Shakiba Sadeghi ,&nbsp;Ashkan Hojjati ,&nbsp;Fatemeh Goltapeh","doi":"10.1016/j.jup.2024.101881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In electric distribution company (DisCos) performance, the effect of imposed features such as network size, economic progress, and geographical conditions is considerable. In this research, K-means clustering is used to model the impact of imposed characteristics in the benchmarking analysis. Commonly, benchmarking studies are focused on DisCos at the outcome stage. However, the efficiency of working processes is as crucial as the outcomes in every organization. This paper proposes a novel combinatorial method integrating quantitative and qualitative measures to benchmark DisCos in both outcome and process stages. In the quantitative section, DisCos’ outcomes are benchmarked through key performance indicators (KPIs). In the qualitative section, utilizing balanced scorecards (BSCs) for measuring the efficiency of DisCos at the process stage is suggested. Ranking under study DisCos, a scoring model based on the normalized summation of obtained scores from KPIs and BSCs, is formulated. Monitoring DisCos’ performance specifically under each of the performance fields in addition to the consequent efficiency scores is attended for analyzing benchmarking results. Eventually, a knowledge management scheme is suggested. Under this framework, each DisCo’s true performance instance is incorporated to gain insights from the accomplishments of similar utilities. This study is useful in regulatory programs for identifying the weaknesses and strengths of utilities or even regulators toward strategic targets, presenting a performance basis, and reducing the performance gaps between utilities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23554,"journal":{"name":"Utilities Policy","volume":"93 ","pages":"Article 101881"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilities Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957178724001759","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In electric distribution company (DisCos) performance, the effect of imposed features such as network size, economic progress, and geographical conditions is considerable. In this research, K-means clustering is used to model the impact of imposed characteristics in the benchmarking analysis. Commonly, benchmarking studies are focused on DisCos at the outcome stage. However, the efficiency of working processes is as crucial as the outcomes in every organization. This paper proposes a novel combinatorial method integrating quantitative and qualitative measures to benchmark DisCos in both outcome and process stages. In the quantitative section, DisCos’ outcomes are benchmarked through key performance indicators (KPIs). In the qualitative section, utilizing balanced scorecards (BSCs) for measuring the efficiency of DisCos at the process stage is suggested. Ranking under study DisCos, a scoring model based on the normalized summation of obtained scores from KPIs and BSCs, is formulated. Monitoring DisCos’ performance specifically under each of the performance fields in addition to the consequent efficiency scores is attended for analyzing benchmarking results. Eventually, a knowledge management scheme is suggested. Under this framework, each DisCo’s true performance instance is incorporated to gain insights from the accomplishments of similar utilities. This study is useful in regulatory programs for identifying the weaknesses and strengths of utilities or even regulators toward strategic targets, presenting a performance basis, and reducing the performance gaps between utilities.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Utilities Policy
Utilities Policy ENERGY & FUELS-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
10.00%
发文量
94
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Utilities Policy is deliberately international, interdisciplinary, and intersectoral. Articles address utility trends and issues in both developed and developing economies. Authors and reviewers come from various disciplines, including economics, political science, sociology, law, finance, accounting, management, and engineering. Areas of focus include the utility and network industries providing essential electricity, natural gas, water and wastewater, solid waste, communications, broadband, postal, and public transportation services. Utilities Policy invites submissions that apply various quantitative and qualitative methods. Contributions are welcome from both established and emerging scholars as well as accomplished practitioners. Interdisciplinary, comparative, and applied works are encouraged. Submissions to the journal should have a clear focus on governance, performance, and/or analysis of public utilities with an aim toward informing the policymaking process and providing recommendations as appropriate. Relevant topics and issues include but are not limited to industry structures and ownership, market design and dynamics, economic development, resource planning, system modeling, accounting and finance, infrastructure investment, supply and demand efficiency, strategic management and productivity, network operations and integration, supply chains, adaptation and flexibility, service-quality standards, benchmarking and metrics, benefit-cost analysis, behavior and incentives, pricing and demand response, economic and environmental regulation, regulatory performance and impact, restructuring and deregulation, and policy institutions.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Good governance and energy justice: Pathways to human development Stakeholder interaction in the digital transformation of China's electric power sector: An evolutionary game model Do independent regulatory authorities impact electricity supply in Sub-Saharan Africa? Maintaining water service quality in the face of climate change: Can stated-preference analysis support priority setting?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1