Judith Anne Garretson Folse , Dora E. Bock , Stephanie M. Mangus , Kristina K. Lindsey Hall
{"title":"Online chat encounters: Satisfying customers through dialogical interaction","authors":"Judith Anne Garretson Folse , Dora E. Bock , Stephanie M. Mangus , Kristina K. Lindsey Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examines the effects of dialogical interaction within online chat (DIOC) on satisfaction, given the marketplace prevalence of these online customer–agent interactions and limited scholarly evidence about their impact. Drawing on service-dominant logic, person–environment fit theory, and existing dialogical interaction (DI) literature, the authors assess predictions using six experiments, including one on the live chat platform Slack, to demonstrate that DIOC significantly boosts satisfaction, especially among customers with utilitarian versus hedonic motives. This effect is explained by goal congruency. The authors also investigate boundary conditions where DIOC’s impact varies, finding it more beneficial for utilitarian-motivated customers when customer–agent similarity is low. Further, dialogical interaction with chatbots and human agents yields similar levels of customer satisfaction for utilitarian-motivated customers. In contrast, hedonically driven customers have higher levels of satisfaction when interacting with human agents. These findings offer practical implications for optimizing customers’ experiences in online chats.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 115197"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This research examines the effects of dialogical interaction within online chat (DIOC) on satisfaction, given the marketplace prevalence of these online customer–agent interactions and limited scholarly evidence about their impact. Drawing on service-dominant logic, person–environment fit theory, and existing dialogical interaction (DI) literature, the authors assess predictions using six experiments, including one on the live chat platform Slack, to demonstrate that DIOC significantly boosts satisfaction, especially among customers with utilitarian versus hedonic motives. This effect is explained by goal congruency. The authors also investigate boundary conditions where DIOC’s impact varies, finding it more beneficial for utilitarian-motivated customers when customer–agent similarity is low. Further, dialogical interaction with chatbots and human agents yields similar levels of customer satisfaction for utilitarian-motivated customers. In contrast, hedonically driven customers have higher levels of satisfaction when interacting with human agents. These findings offer practical implications for optimizing customers’ experiences in online chats.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.