Online chat encounters: Satisfying customers through dialogical interaction

IF 10.5 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Journal of Business Research Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115197
Judith Anne Garretson Folse , Dora E. Bock , Stephanie M. Mangus , Kristina K. Lindsey Hall
{"title":"Online chat encounters: Satisfying customers through dialogical interaction","authors":"Judith Anne Garretson Folse ,&nbsp;Dora E. Bock ,&nbsp;Stephanie M. Mangus ,&nbsp;Kristina K. Lindsey Hall","doi":"10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examines the effects of dialogical interaction within online chat (DIOC) on satisfaction, given the marketplace prevalence of these online customer–agent interactions and limited scholarly evidence about their impact. Drawing on service-dominant logic, person–environment fit theory, and existing dialogical interaction (DI) literature, the authors assess predictions using six experiments, including one on the live chat platform Slack, to demonstrate that DIOC significantly boosts satisfaction, especially among customers with utilitarian versus hedonic motives. This effect is explained by goal congruency. The authors also investigate boundary conditions where DIOC’s impact varies, finding it more beneficial for utilitarian-motivated customers when customer–agent similarity is low. Further, dialogical interaction with chatbots and human agents yields similar levels of customer satisfaction for utilitarian-motivated customers. In contrast, hedonically driven customers have higher levels of satisfaction when interacting with human agents. These findings offer practical implications for optimizing customers’ experiences in online chats.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15123,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Research","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 115197"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325000207","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the effects of dialogical interaction within online chat (DIOC) on satisfaction, given the marketplace prevalence of these online customer–agent interactions and limited scholarly evidence about their impact. Drawing on service-dominant logic, person–environment fit theory, and existing dialogical interaction (DI) literature, the authors assess predictions using six experiments, including one on the live chat platform Slack, to demonstrate that DIOC significantly boosts satisfaction, especially among customers with utilitarian versus hedonic motives. This effect is explained by goal congruency. The authors also investigate boundary conditions where DIOC’s impact varies, finding it more beneficial for utilitarian-motivated customers when customer–agent similarity is low. Further, dialogical interaction with chatbots and human agents yields similar levels of customer satisfaction for utilitarian-motivated customers. In contrast, hedonically driven customers have higher levels of satisfaction when interacting with human agents. These findings offer practical implications for optimizing customers’ experiences in online chats.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
10.60%
发文量
956
期刊介绍: The Journal of Business Research aims to publish research that is rigorous, relevant, and potentially impactful. It examines a wide variety of business decision contexts, processes, and activities, developing insights that are meaningful for theory, practice, and/or society at large. The research is intended to generate meaningful debates in academia and practice, that are thought provoking and have the potential to make a difference to conceptual thinking and/or practice. The Journal is published for a broad range of stakeholders, including scholars, researchers, executives, and policy makers. It aids the application of its research to practical situations and theoretical findings to the reality of the business world as well as to society. The Journal is abstracted and indexed in several databases, including Social Sciences Citation Index, ANBAR, Current Contents, Management Contents, Management Literature in Brief, PsycINFO, Information Service, RePEc, Academic Journal Guide, ABI/Inform, INSPEC, etc.
期刊最新文献
Order or disorder? The impact of product display on consumer purchase intention When customer involvement promotes innovation performance: The moderating roles of coordination mechanisms with customers and external collaboration strategies Eating our anxieties away: How low collective efficacy about climate change fuels vice food consumption Building resilience in love: Investigating the effects of employee resilience on spouse outcomes Opening the ‘black box’ of HRM algorithmic biases – How hiring practices induce discrimination on freelancing platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1