Kristin L. Olofsson , Jared B. Fitzgerald , Md Belal Hossain
{"title":"Assessing multi-dimensional complexity through sustainability modeling: A whole community approach","authors":"Kristin L. Olofsson , Jared B. Fitzgerald , Md Belal Hossain","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study engages sustainability thinking to better understand challenges faced by communities in the United States. Sustainability thinking recognizes that communities are complex systems in which economic development, social equity, and ecological integrity form the basis of resiliency, and those drivers should inform policymaking. To that end, this study develops a whole community sustainability (WCS) index that relies on complexity as a strength of the measure. Taking inspiration from the framework approach of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the authors identify 16 unique measures that capture different aspects of community sustainability. Using data from 2010 to 2014, each component of the index is calibrated using techniques from Qualitative Comparative Analysis and then combined to yield a robust index that can be compared across and within space and over time. After constructing the measure, we apply to the case of Oklahoma and find that rural Oklahoma counties outperformed urban counties on WCS during the time period. However, there is higher variability among rural communities relative to non-rural counties in Oklahoma for the overall index and its subcomponents, as both the highest and lowest performing counties are rural. Further analysis indicates that there are racial and class differences in counties that perform well compared to those that perform poorly. This study contributes to literature on sustainability and rural development by creating a replicable model that highlights the importance of a whole community approach. By recognizing the complexities that feed into the characterization of communities, policymakers and community leaders could utilize the WCS index to develop stronger approaches to community sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104002"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study engages sustainability thinking to better understand challenges faced by communities in the United States. Sustainability thinking recognizes that communities are complex systems in which economic development, social equity, and ecological integrity form the basis of resiliency, and those drivers should inform policymaking. To that end, this study develops a whole community sustainability (WCS) index that relies on complexity as a strength of the measure. Taking inspiration from the framework approach of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the authors identify 16 unique measures that capture different aspects of community sustainability. Using data from 2010 to 2014, each component of the index is calibrated using techniques from Qualitative Comparative Analysis and then combined to yield a robust index that can be compared across and within space and over time. After constructing the measure, we apply to the case of Oklahoma and find that rural Oklahoma counties outperformed urban counties on WCS during the time period. However, there is higher variability among rural communities relative to non-rural counties in Oklahoma for the overall index and its subcomponents, as both the highest and lowest performing counties are rural. Further analysis indicates that there are racial and class differences in counties that perform well compared to those that perform poorly. This study contributes to literature on sustainability and rural development by creating a replicable model that highlights the importance of a whole community approach. By recognizing the complexities that feed into the characterization of communities, policymakers and community leaders could utilize the WCS index to develop stronger approaches to community sustainability.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.