Assessing multi-dimensional complexity through sustainability modeling: A whole community approach

IF 5.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104002
Kristin L. Olofsson , Jared B. Fitzgerald , Md Belal Hossain
{"title":"Assessing multi-dimensional complexity through sustainability modeling: A whole community approach","authors":"Kristin L. Olofsson ,&nbsp;Jared B. Fitzgerald ,&nbsp;Md Belal Hossain","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study engages sustainability thinking to better understand challenges faced by communities in the United States. Sustainability thinking recognizes that communities are complex systems in which economic development, social equity, and ecological integrity form the basis of resiliency, and those drivers should inform policymaking. To that end, this study develops a whole community sustainability (WCS) index that relies on complexity as a strength of the measure. Taking inspiration from the framework approach of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the authors identify 16 unique measures that capture different aspects of community sustainability. Using data from 2010 to 2014, each component of the index is calibrated using techniques from Qualitative Comparative Analysis and then combined to yield a robust index that can be compared across and within space and over time. After constructing the measure, we apply to the case of Oklahoma and find that rural Oklahoma counties outperformed urban counties on WCS during the time period. However, there is higher variability among rural communities relative to non-rural counties in Oklahoma for the overall index and its subcomponents, as both the highest and lowest performing counties are rural. Further analysis indicates that there are racial and class differences in counties that perform well compared to those that perform poorly. This study contributes to literature on sustainability and rural development by creating a replicable model that highlights the importance of a whole community approach. By recognizing the complexities that feed into the characterization of communities, policymakers and community leaders could utilize the WCS index to develop stronger approaches to community sustainability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104002"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study engages sustainability thinking to better understand challenges faced by communities in the United States. Sustainability thinking recognizes that communities are complex systems in which economic development, social equity, and ecological integrity form the basis of resiliency, and those drivers should inform policymaking. To that end, this study develops a whole community sustainability (WCS) index that relies on complexity as a strength of the measure. Taking inspiration from the framework approach of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), the authors identify 16 unique measures that capture different aspects of community sustainability. Using data from 2010 to 2014, each component of the index is calibrated using techniques from Qualitative Comparative Analysis and then combined to yield a robust index that can be compared across and within space and over time. After constructing the measure, we apply to the case of Oklahoma and find that rural Oklahoma counties outperformed urban counties on WCS during the time period. However, there is higher variability among rural communities relative to non-rural counties in Oklahoma for the overall index and its subcomponents, as both the highest and lowest performing counties are rural. Further analysis indicates that there are racial and class differences in counties that perform well compared to those that perform poorly. This study contributes to literature on sustainability and rural development by creating a replicable model that highlights the importance of a whole community approach. By recognizing the complexities that feed into the characterization of communities, policymakers and community leaders could utilize the WCS index to develop stronger approaches to community sustainability.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过可持续性建模评估多维复杂性:一个整体社区方法
本研究运用可持续性思维来更好地理解美国社区面临的挑战。可持续性思维认识到社区是一个复杂的系统,其中经济发展、社会公平和生态完整性构成了弹性的基础,这些驱动因素应该为政策制定提供信息。为此,本研究开发了一个整体社区可持续性(WCS)指数,该指数依赖于复杂性作为衡量的优势。从联合国可持续发展目标(SDGs)的框架方法中获得灵感,作者确定了16个独特的措施,这些措施涵盖了社区可持续性的不同方面。使用2010年至2014年的数据,该指数的每个组成部分都使用定性比较分析的技术进行校准,然后组合成一个可靠的指数,可以跨空间、跨时间进行比较。在构建测度后,我们将其应用于俄克拉何马州的案例,发现俄克拉何马州农村县在这段时间内的WCS表现优于城市县。然而,与俄克拉何马州的非农村县相比,农村社区在总体指数及其子成分方面存在更大的差异,因为表现最高和最低的县都是农村。进一步的分析表明,表现良好的县与表现不佳的县相比,存在种族和阶级差异。这项研究通过创建一个可复制的模型,突出了整个社区方法的重要性,为可持续发展和农村发展的文献做出了贡献。通过认识到社区特征的复杂性,政策制定者和社区领导人可以利用WCS指数制定更强有力的社区可持续性方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Emerging circular economy practices, environmental health risks, and the “tailings paradox” in Africa’s artisanal and small-scale mining: Evidence from Ghana Whose doctrine, whose priority?: On the troublesome legal interpretation of the Aboriginal right to fish by Canadian courts From generation to treatment: A comprehensive and critical review of landfill leachate The genealogy of mining sustainability Enabling system-level trust: Polycentric governance for complex, many-scaled environmental problems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1