Knowledge for change or more of the same? The role of policy knowledge systems in the Nationally Determined Contributions of Ghana, Kenya and South Africa

IF 5.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-05 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104016
Michael Boulle , Britta Rennkamp, Emily Tyler, Mark New
{"title":"Knowledge for change or more of the same? The role of policy knowledge systems in the Nationally Determined Contributions of Ghana, Kenya and South Africa","authors":"Michael Boulle ,&nbsp;Britta Rennkamp,&nbsp;Emily Tyler,&nbsp;Mark New","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The sum of the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) continue to be inadequate for achieving the global climate goals articulated in the Paris Agreement, despite their five-yearly updates. The role of knowledge in formulating and implementing NDCs is critical for identifying how individual Parties can improve their NDCs. This paper applies a policy knowledge systems perspective, to analyse the evolution of the knowledge systems responsible for formulating the 2015 intended NDCs (iNDCs) and the 2021 NDC Updates, in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa. The analysis showed in varying degrees that: i) improving design and access to NDC processes increased credibility, legitimacy and relevance of their outcomes; ii) knowledge bases for the Updates improved upon the knowledge bases of the iNDCs, thereby delivering more robust and ambitious targets, with local universities playing key roles; iii) local representation, transparency, inclusivity and communication were critical factors to strengthen the knowledge bases. Where a knowledge base was strong and well communicated, ideological differences could be bridged and consensus built, while less developed parts of a knowledge base were more contested; iv) inclusivity and transparency in the processes were critical to balance access and representation of actors; v) the NDC processes connected national and international climate processes, exerting pressure on one another. Finally, the evolution of the NDCs has demonstrated their impact as agenda-setting policy instruments but they have demonstrated less evidence of impact in terms of implementation. In sum, designing and conducting robust processes, developing strong knowledge systems, and inclusive actor participation, drove change towards stronger NDC formulation processes and outcomes. At the same time change was resisted, evident in the legacies and lock-ins of these processes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"164 ","pages":"Article 104016"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901125000322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The sum of the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) continue to be inadequate for achieving the global climate goals articulated in the Paris Agreement, despite their five-yearly updates. The role of knowledge in formulating and implementing NDCs is critical for identifying how individual Parties can improve their NDCs. This paper applies a policy knowledge systems perspective, to analyse the evolution of the knowledge systems responsible for formulating the 2015 intended NDCs (iNDCs) and the 2021 NDC Updates, in Ghana, Kenya and South Africa. The analysis showed in varying degrees that: i) improving design and access to NDC processes increased credibility, legitimacy and relevance of their outcomes; ii) knowledge bases for the Updates improved upon the knowledge bases of the iNDCs, thereby delivering more robust and ambitious targets, with local universities playing key roles; iii) local representation, transparency, inclusivity and communication were critical factors to strengthen the knowledge bases. Where a knowledge base was strong and well communicated, ideological differences could be bridged and consensus built, while less developed parts of a knowledge base were more contested; iv) inclusivity and transparency in the processes were critical to balance access and representation of actors; v) the NDC processes connected national and international climate processes, exerting pressure on one another. Finally, the evolution of the NDCs has demonstrated their impact as agenda-setting policy instruments but they have demonstrated less evidence of impact in terms of implementation. In sum, designing and conducting robust processes, developing strong knowledge systems, and inclusive actor participation, drove change towards stronger NDC formulation processes and outcomes. At the same time change was resisted, evident in the legacies and lock-ins of these processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识的变化还是更多的相同?政策知识系统在加纳、肯尼亚和南非国家自主贡献中的作用
尽管国家自主贡献(NDCs)每五年更新一次,但其总额仍然不足以实现《巴黎协定》中阐明的全球气候目标。知识在制定和执行国家自主贡献方面的作用对于确定各缔约方如何改进其国家自主贡献至关重要。本文运用政策知识系统的视角,分析了加纳、肯尼亚和南非制定2015年国家自主贡献计划和2021年国家自主贡献更新计划的知识系统的演变。分析在不同程度上表明:i)改进国家自主贡献流程的设计和获取,提高了其结果的可信度、合法性和相关性;ii)更新计划的知识基础在国家自主贡献的基础上得到改善,从而在本地大学发挥关键作用的情况下,制定更有力和雄心勃勃的目标;(三)地方代表性、透明度、包容性和沟通是加强知识基础的关键因素。如果知识库强大且沟通良好,则可以弥合意识形态上的分歧并建立共识,而知识库中欠发达的部分则更有争议;(四)进程的包容性和透明度对于平衡行动者的可及性和代表性至关重要;(5)国家自主贡献进程连接了国家和国际气候进程,相互施加压力。最后,国家自主贡献的演变表明了它们作为议程设定政策工具的影响,但在执行方面的影响证据较少。总而言之,设计和实施稳健的流程,开发强大的知识体系,以及包容性的行动者参与,推动了朝着更强大的国家自主贡献制定流程和成果的方向发展。与此同时,变革受到抵制,这在这些过程的遗留问题和锁定中很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Decolonising hydrology: Reflecting on positionalities for sustainable and just futures A subnational social vulnerability index for use in drought decision support systems Tides of tension: Exploring the blue economy through stakeholder narrations Bridging waters and power: Hydrosocial territories with socio-natural resilience in China's Great Yangtze River protection programme The Global Framework for Climate Services: An ‘imaginary’ of climate services shaping practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1