Detecting energy injustices: Climbing the ladder of “hidden morality”

IF 9.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-12 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114465
Nynke van Uffelen , Sander ten Caat
{"title":"Detecting energy injustices: Climbing the ladder of “hidden morality”","authors":"Nynke van Uffelen ,&nbsp;Sander ten Caat","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Governing a just energy transition requires detecting and anticipating energy injustices. Although much scholarly attention has been given to frameworks to <em>analyse</em> energy injustices, a consistent framework for policymakers and researchers to <em>detect</em> them is lacking. Current methods for detecting what the publics perceive as (un)just rely on explicit articulations of grievances by citizens in official participatory settings or during energy conflicts. However, it is implausible that all injustices manifest within these contexts. This study introduces a framework to understand why injustices might remain unseen and unaddressed, inspired by the concept of <em>hidden morality</em> as introduced by the philosopher Axel Honneth. The framework of hidden morality conceptualises several steps between an injustice and social change: (1) experience of injustices; (2) expression of injustices; (3) collective action; (4) uptake in public discourse; (5) reformulation; and (6) social change. Between each of these steps, different obstacles can arise. The paper explores the mechanisms that prevent energy injustices from surfacing and being resolved through philosophical literature and two case studies. Its contribution is twofold: it raises awareness of the fact that injustices can remain undetected, and it proposes a framework that is the first systematic tool for policymakers to detect injustices when making energy policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 114465"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524004853","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Governing a just energy transition requires detecting and anticipating energy injustices. Although much scholarly attention has been given to frameworks to analyse energy injustices, a consistent framework for policymakers and researchers to detect them is lacking. Current methods for detecting what the publics perceive as (un)just rely on explicit articulations of grievances by citizens in official participatory settings or during energy conflicts. However, it is implausible that all injustices manifest within these contexts. This study introduces a framework to understand why injustices might remain unseen and unaddressed, inspired by the concept of hidden morality as introduced by the philosopher Axel Honneth. The framework of hidden morality conceptualises several steps between an injustice and social change: (1) experience of injustices; (2) expression of injustices; (3) collective action; (4) uptake in public discourse; (5) reformulation; and (6) social change. Between each of these steps, different obstacles can arise. The paper explores the mechanisms that prevent energy injustices from surfacing and being resolved through philosophical literature and two case studies. Its contribution is twofold: it raises awareness of the fact that injustices can remain undetected, and it proposes a framework that is the first systematic tool for policymakers to detect injustices when making energy policies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发现能源不公正:攀登“隐性道德”的阶梯
管理一个公正的能源转型需要发现和预测能源不公正。尽管学术界对分析能源不公平的框架给予了很多关注,但政策制定者和研究人员却缺乏一个一致的框架来发现它们。目前检测公众认为什么是(不)的方法仅仅依赖于公民在官方参与环境或能源冲突期间明确表达不满。然而,所有的不公正都在这些情况下表现出来是不可能的。本研究引入了一个框架,以理解为什么不公正可能一直被忽视和未解决,灵感来自哲学家阿克塞尔·霍尼特(Axel Honneth)提出的隐藏道德概念。隐性道德的框架概念化了不公正与社会变革之间的几个步骤:(1)不公正的经历;(2)表达不公正;(三)集体行动;(4)公共话语吸收;(5)再形成;(6)社会变革。在这些步骤之间,可能会出现不同的障碍。本文通过哲学文献和两个案例研究,探讨了防止能源不公正现象浮出水面并得到解决的机制。它的贡献是双重的:它提高了人们对不公正现象可能不被发现这一事实的认识,它提出了一个框架,这是政策制定者在制定能源政策时发现不公正现象的第一个系统工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Urban development and the energy transition: Evidence from Chinese cities Can data infrastructure construction alleviate clean energy misallocation?—An analysis based on China's provincial data Mexico’s energy crossroads: Navigating a complex transition Geopolitical fragmentation and the clean energy transition: How economic sanctions hinder renewable energy development How do Indian states fare in electricity decarbonization? A consumption-based decomposition analysis at subnational level
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1