Balancing supply security and decarbonization: Optimizing Germany’s LNG port infrastructure under the European Green Deal

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Energy Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-08 DOI:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114484
Per J. Agrell, Henri Dehaybe, Manuel Herrera Rodriguez
{"title":"Balancing supply security and decarbonization: Optimizing Germany’s LNG port infrastructure under the European Green Deal","authors":"Per J. Agrell,&nbsp;Henri Dehaybe,&nbsp;Manuel Herrera Rodriguez","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The European Green Deal depends on a coordinated common policy for demand, renewable generation, supply security, and infrastructure. To ensure supply security after 2022 gas supply interruptions, the German government diversified energy imports into liquefied natural gas (LNG) through the use of floating storage and regasification units (FSRU). We test whether the current plan for Germany is consistent with the Green Deal objectives for decarbonization. We use a cost-minimizing facility location model following European policy objectives, combined with a network flow model, to optimize the assignment of FSRUs among German ports to ensure gas supply. Six scenarios are investigated: three greenfield models, with different demand scenarios, in which all locations are possible, a brownfield model in which the existing terminals are imposed, a no-FSRU scenario and a peace scenario between Ukraine and Russia. The optimal solutions for the base greenfield scenarios use the FSRU port infrastructures to expand the regasification capacity to 45 bcm per year. The model validates actual current decisions as optimal for supply security, but the two greenfield and long-term decisions differ in length and investment intensity, challenging policy consistency. Potentially, the impact of anticipatory hydrogen transport investments can distort the analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 114484"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421524005044","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The European Green Deal depends on a coordinated common policy for demand, renewable generation, supply security, and infrastructure. To ensure supply security after 2022 gas supply interruptions, the German government diversified energy imports into liquefied natural gas (LNG) through the use of floating storage and regasification units (FSRU). We test whether the current plan for Germany is consistent with the Green Deal objectives for decarbonization. We use a cost-minimizing facility location model following European policy objectives, combined with a network flow model, to optimize the assignment of FSRUs among German ports to ensure gas supply. Six scenarios are investigated: three greenfield models, with different demand scenarios, in which all locations are possible, a brownfield model in which the existing terminals are imposed, a no-FSRU scenario and a peace scenario between Ukraine and Russia. The optimal solutions for the base greenfield scenarios use the FSRU port infrastructures to expand the regasification capacity to 45 bcm per year. The model validates actual current decisions as optimal for supply security, but the two greenfield and long-term decisions differ in length and investment intensity, challenging policy consistency. Potentially, the impact of anticipatory hydrogen transport investments can distort the analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
期刊最新文献
Deceptive greenwashing by retail electricity providers under renewable portfolio standards: The impact of market transparency The economics of small modular reactors at coal sites: A program-level analysis within the state of Texas Support mechanisms for low-carbon hydrogen: The risks of segmenting a commodity market The asymmetric impact of energy shortages on sustainable development, human development and economic growth in South Asian countries: The moderating role of globalization Bright cities and intelligences: Can access to ICTs sustainably reduce energy poverty in Africa?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1