When public relations ethics clash with reality: How PR professionals negotiate “brown envelope” practices in interactions with journalists

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Public Relations Review Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102534
Oluseyi Adegbola , Olushola Aromona , Adeola Abdulateef Elega
{"title":"When public relations ethics clash with reality: How PR professionals negotiate “brown envelope” practices in interactions with journalists","authors":"Oluseyi Adegbola ,&nbsp;Olushola Aromona ,&nbsp;Adeola Abdulateef Elega","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>“Brown envelope journalism”, a practice that involves the exchange of cash gifts for positive coverage, has received considerable scholarly attention and is viewed as a challenge to journalistic objectivity. Yet, limited research has examined the challenge this presents to public relations professionals in their interactions with journalists. This study examines how public relations professionals in Nigeria view brown envelope practices and navigate journalists’ requests or expectations of cash gifts. Using in-depth interviews with selected practitioners, we found that public relations professionals view brown envelope practices primarily as an economic issue, but also acknowledge the cultural and ethical components. Further, practitioners report using different strategies including profiteering-exploiting, reframing, or proactive relationship building. Findings highlight the importance of nuance and context in assessing practices bordering on ethics, as well as relationship management as key to sustainable ethical practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 102534"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811124001139","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“Brown envelope journalism”, a practice that involves the exchange of cash gifts for positive coverage, has received considerable scholarly attention and is viewed as a challenge to journalistic objectivity. Yet, limited research has examined the challenge this presents to public relations professionals in their interactions with journalists. This study examines how public relations professionals in Nigeria view brown envelope practices and navigate journalists’ requests or expectations of cash gifts. Using in-depth interviews with selected practitioners, we found that public relations professionals view brown envelope practices primarily as an economic issue, but also acknowledge the cultural and ethical components. Further, practitioners report using different strategies including profiteering-exploiting, reframing, or proactive relationship building. Findings highlight the importance of nuance and context in assessing practices bordering on ethics, as well as relationship management as key to sustainable ethical practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当公共关系伦理与现实发生冲突:公关专业人员如何在与记者的互动中谈判“棕色信封”实践
“棕色信封新闻”,一种涉及交换现金礼物以获得正面报道的做法,已经受到了相当多的学术关注,并被视为对新闻客观性的挑战。然而,有限的研究调查了这给公关专业人员与记者互动带来的挑战。本研究考察了尼日利亚的公共关系专业人士如何看待棕色信封做法,以及如何应对记者对现金礼物的要求或期望。通过对选定的从业人员进行深入访谈,我们发现公共关系专业人员将棕色信封实践主要视为一个经济问题,但也承认其文化和道德因素。此外,从业者报告使用不同的策略,包括牟取暴利、重构或积极的关系建立。研究结果强调了细微差别和背景在评估道德实践方面的重要性,以及关系管理作为可持续道德实践的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
期刊最新文献
The confidence trap: A conceptual framework for understanding the gendered leadership gap in public relations Behind the Ennui: Reconceptualizing employee disengagement, its drivers and internal communication management strategies in a global context of practice “kamala IS brat:” Effects of online campaign content on young adults’ political organization-public relationships and participation Editorial Board “My body, my choice”: Discursive brandjacking and the strategic reframing of protest language
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1