You asked, we listened: Examining accountability through actions and listening in corporate social advocacy

IF 3.4 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Public Relations Review Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102536
Barbara Miller Gaither , Seoyeon Kim , Lucinda L. Austin
{"title":"You asked, we listened: Examining accountability through actions and listening in corporate social advocacy","authors":"Barbara Miller Gaither ,&nbsp;Seoyeon Kim ,&nbsp;Lucinda L. Austin","doi":"10.1016/j.pubrev.2024.102536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The purpose of this study was to examine corporate social advocacy (CSA) through the lens of stakeholder theory to explore how different CSA strategies may impact perceptions of accountability and stakeholder outcomes. A 2 (demonstrable action: present v. absent) x 2 (organizational listening: present v. absent) experiment was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 636 U.S. adults. Results revealed that both demonstrable action and organizational listening had positive effects on CSA accountability (i.e., perceived intent and perceived transparency), and these measures of accountability led to positive attitudes and supportive intentions toward the company. The findings provide guidelines for how CSA can effectively demonstrate accountability to stakeholders – to move beyond talking-the-talk to actually being seen as walking-the-walk in regard to engagement on social-political issues.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48263,"journal":{"name":"Public Relations Review","volume":"51 1","pages":"Article 102536"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Relations Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0363811124001152","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine corporate social advocacy (CSA) through the lens of stakeholder theory to explore how different CSA strategies may impact perceptions of accountability and stakeholder outcomes. A 2 (demonstrable action: present v. absent) x 2 (organizational listening: present v. absent) experiment was conducted with a nationally representative sample of 636 U.S. adults. Results revealed that both demonstrable action and organizational listening had positive effects on CSA accountability (i.e., perceived intent and perceived transparency), and these measures of accountability led to positive attitudes and supportive intentions toward the company. The findings provide guidelines for how CSA can effectively demonstrate accountability to stakeholders – to move beyond talking-the-talk to actually being seen as walking-the-walk in regard to engagement on social-political issues.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你问,我们听:通过企业社会倡导的行动和倾听来审视问责制
本研究的目的是通过利益相关者理论的视角来考察企业社会倡导(CSA),探讨不同的CSA策略如何影响问责制和利益相关者结果的感知。一个2(可证明的行动:出席与缺席)x 2(组织倾听:出席与缺席)的实验在636个具有全国代表性的样本 U.S.中进行成年人。结果显示,可证明的行动和组织倾听都对CSA问责(即感知意图和感知透明度)有积极的影响,这些问责措施导致了对公司的积极态度和支持意图。研究结果为CSA如何有效地向利益相关者展示责任提供了指导方针——在参与社会政治问题方面,从空谈变为实际行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
19.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Public Relations Review is the oldest journal devoted to articles that examine public relations in depth, and commentaries by specialists in the field. Most of the articles are based on empirical research undertaken by professionals and academics in the field. In addition to research articles and commentaries, The Review publishes invited research in brief, and book reviews in the fields of public relations, mass communications, organizational communications, public opinion formations, social science research and evaluation, marketing, management and public policy formation.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The confidence trap: A conceptual framework for understanding the gendered leadership gap in public relations Behind the Ennui: Reconceptualizing employee disengagement, its drivers and internal communication management strategies in a global context of practice The role of public relations to address a global turning point on sustainability Mapping stakeholder expectations along organizational outcomes: How familiarity and sentiment shape core and peripheral issue priorities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1