The influence of macroscopic pedestrian structures on train boarding efficiency

Rabia I. Kodapanakkal , Caspar A.S. Pouw , Antal Haans , Jaap Ham , Gunter Bombaerts , Alessandro Corbetta , Andrej Dameski , Andreas Spahn , Federico Toschi
{"title":"The influence of macroscopic pedestrian structures on train boarding efficiency","authors":"Rabia I. Kodapanakkal ,&nbsp;Caspar A.S. Pouw ,&nbsp;Antal Haans ,&nbsp;Jaap Ham ,&nbsp;Gunter Bombaerts ,&nbsp;Alessandro Corbetta ,&nbsp;Andrej Dameski ,&nbsp;Andreas Spahn ,&nbsp;Federico Toschi","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2024.101319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A deeper understanding of pedestrian dynamics is essential to improve crowd flows in public spaces such as train stations. It is essential to understand both the physical and the psychological processes present in this context. However, current research on train boarding behavior is limited in scope and mainly focuses on how group level variables such as number of boarders/deboarders influence train boarding efficiency. Viewing pedestrian dynamics through a psychological lens is important for a detailed understanding of the train boarding context and to recognize target areas for improvement. At Dutch train stations, boarders follow a social norm of waiting at the train door until deboarding is complete. Although people generally adhere to this norm, the way it is executed may not be optimal for deboarding efficiency. We investigate how waiting boarders form a deboarding channel (a corridor where deboarders exit the train) and how this channel in turn influences the efficiency of deboarding. Analyzing a dataset with 3278 boarding events at Utrecht Centraal Station in the Netherlands from 2017 to 2020 (subset of a trajectory dataset capturing 100,000 trajectories per day), we found that higher numbers of boarders and a higher ratio of boarders to deboarders, reduced the width of the deboarding channel, and a lower width was associated with lower deboarding efficiency. These results shift the focus from group level variables to identifying macroscopic structures that are formed when pedestrians interact within a social system and provide specific target areas where nudges/behavioral interventions could be implemented.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101319"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198224003051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A deeper understanding of pedestrian dynamics is essential to improve crowd flows in public spaces such as train stations. It is essential to understand both the physical and the psychological processes present in this context. However, current research on train boarding behavior is limited in scope and mainly focuses on how group level variables such as number of boarders/deboarders influence train boarding efficiency. Viewing pedestrian dynamics through a psychological lens is important for a detailed understanding of the train boarding context and to recognize target areas for improvement. At Dutch train stations, boarders follow a social norm of waiting at the train door until deboarding is complete. Although people generally adhere to this norm, the way it is executed may not be optimal for deboarding efficiency. We investigate how waiting boarders form a deboarding channel (a corridor where deboarders exit the train) and how this channel in turn influences the efficiency of deboarding. Analyzing a dataset with 3278 boarding events at Utrecht Centraal Station in the Netherlands from 2017 to 2020 (subset of a trajectory dataset capturing 100,000 trajectories per day), we found that higher numbers of boarders and a higher ratio of boarders to deboarders, reduced the width of the deboarding channel, and a lower width was associated with lower deboarding efficiency. These results shift the focus from group level variables to identifying macroscopic structures that are formed when pedestrians interact within a social system and provide specific target areas where nudges/behavioral interventions could be implemented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宏观行人结构对列车上车效率的影响
更深入地了解行人动态对于改善火车站等公共场所的人群流动至关重要。在这种情况下,理解生理和心理过程是至关重要的。然而,目前对列车上车行为的研究范围有限,主要集中在上车/下车人数等群体层面变量对列车上车效率的影响。通过心理学的视角来观察行人动态对于详细了解火车上车环境和识别需要改进的目标区域非常重要。在荷兰的火车站,登机者遵循一种社会规范,即在火车门口等候,直到下火车完毕。尽管人们普遍遵守这一规范,但执行的方式可能不是最优的登机效率。我们研究了候车乘客如何形成一个下机通道(一个下机乘客下车的通道),以及这个通道如何反过来影响下机效率。分析了2017年至2020年荷兰乌得勒支中央车站3278起登机事件的数据集(每天捕获10万个轨迹数据集的子集),我们发现,登机人数越多,登机与下机的比例越高,下机通道的宽度就会减小,而宽度越低,下机效率就越低。这些结果将重点从群体层面的变量转移到识别行人在社会系统中互动时形成的宏观结构,并提供可以实施轻推/行为干预的特定目标区域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Probing urban road network congestion propagation and dissipation Groundwork for adolescent bikeability assessment in Germany: An open GIS and regularised regression approach across cities, towns and rural areas Predicting pedestrian crash risk around bus stops: A multi-city random forest approach From work environment to roadway: A narrative review on organizational psychology’s role in road safety A network-based framework for interplanetary logistics governance: organizational resilience and technological cooperation in space missions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1