Understanding public views on electric vehicle charging: A thematic analysis

Colin Ashby , David Weir , Peter Fussey
{"title":"Understanding public views on electric vehicle charging: A thematic analysis","authors":"Colin Ashby ,&nbsp;David Weir ,&nbsp;Peter Fussey","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Studies have identified EV charging as a major barrier to EV adoption. We analyse public opinion related to EV charging to understand perceived charging-related barriers and successes. We extract EV charging related posts from Twitter using a pipeline based on BERTopic and Large Language Models, with manual review, to create a thematic structure driven by the data, then analyse these themes using message sentiment and volume. Strong interest and positive sentiment exists around charging technologies and public infrastructure deployment, indicating hope for the future of EV adoption and public deployment meeting demand. Negative opinion exists around blocked and broken chargers, the impact of cold climate, EV ”subsidies” and since 2020 a weakening of the economic argument for EVs. Home charging is viewed enthusiastically by those with access to it and as a barrier and inequity by those that do not. Green issues received the least interest of all our themes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"29 ","pages":"Article 101325"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225000041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies have identified EV charging as a major barrier to EV adoption. We analyse public opinion related to EV charging to understand perceived charging-related barriers and successes. We extract EV charging related posts from Twitter using a pipeline based on BERTopic and Large Language Models, with manual review, to create a thematic structure driven by the data, then analyse these themes using message sentiment and volume. Strong interest and positive sentiment exists around charging technologies and public infrastructure deployment, indicating hope for the future of EV adoption and public deployment meeting demand. Negative opinion exists around blocked and broken chargers, the impact of cold climate, EV ”subsidies” and since 2020 a weakening of the economic argument for EVs. Home charging is viewed enthusiastically by those with access to it and as a barrier and inequity by those that do not. Green issues received the least interest of all our themes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解公众对电动汽车充电的看法:专题分析
研究表明,电动汽车充电是电动汽车普及的主要障碍。我们分析了与电动汽车充电相关的公众意见,以了解与充电相关的障碍和成功。我们使用基于BERTopic和大型语言模型的管道从Twitter中提取电动汽车收费相关帖子,并进行人工审查,以数据为驱动创建主题结构,然后使用消息情绪和数量分析这些主题。人们对充电技术和公共基础设施部署有着浓厚的兴趣和积极的情绪,这表明未来电动汽车的采用和公共部署将满足需求。负面意见主要围绕充电器堵塞和损坏、寒冷气候的影响、电动汽车“补贴”以及自2020年以来电动汽车经济论据的减弱。家庭充电被那些有机会的人热情地视为障碍和不平等,而那些没有机会的人则视为不平等。在我们所有的主题中,环保问题最不受欢迎。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Probing urban road network congestion propagation and dissipation Groundwork for adolescent bikeability assessment in Germany: An open GIS and regularised regression approach across cities, towns and rural areas Predicting pedestrian crash risk around bus stops: A multi-city random forest approach From work environment to roadway: A narrative review on organizational psychology’s role in road safety A network-based framework for interplanetary logistics governance: organizational resilience and technological cooperation in space missions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1