Naturalistic driving study data applied to road infrastructure: A systematic review

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Journal of Safety Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.022
Fletcher J. Howell, Azhaginiyal Arularasu, David B. Logan, Sjaan Koppel
{"title":"Naturalistic driving study data applied to road infrastructure: A systematic review","authors":"Fletcher J. Howell,&nbsp;Azhaginiyal Arularasu,&nbsp;David B. Logan,&nbsp;Sjaan Koppel","doi":"10.1016/j.jsr.2024.11.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><div>Naturalistic driving studies (NDS) have great potential to characterize the road infrastructure factors influencing everyday driving. A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the objectives, data processing, and analyses in best-practice applications of NDS data to road infrastructure. <em>Method:</em> Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of seven databases was conducted on 27 June 2023 (PROSPERO CRD42023434948). Fifty-three English-language, peer-reviewed studies were analyzed on the basis of the primary infrastructure category reflected in the research aims. <em>Results:</em> Studies described curves (14), turns at intersections (8), intersections (6), multi-modal treatments (6), ramps (4), work zones (4), charging (2), and other factors (9). Each study was assessed for the risk of methodological bias using amended National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute templates for Quality Assurance. 74% of studies were assessed to be of ’Good’ quality, 13% of ‘Fair’ quality, and 13% of ‘Poor’ quality. Road infrastructure was characterized by external video (38%) complemented by non-NDS sources including satellite imagery (21%) and government data (19%). Data preparation was required in 91% of studies to extract meaningful variables (e.g. manual video coding) and/or link multiple datasets. Analysis predominantly determined correlations between aspects of driver behavior (speed, trajectory, etc.) and infrastructure factors (geometry, lane configuration, etc.). Conclusions: The methods employed were broadly applicable, but required considerable subject-specific adaptation for non-NDS datasets and/or time-consuming video coding. The incorporation of road infrastructure factors in NDS research can continue to be improved by reducing the computational cost of sample processing.Practical Applications: Encouraged by the adaptability of the identified methods, NDS research has the potential to benefit from the consideration of road infrastructure factors in a Safe System context. The analytical requirements for all components of the Safe System should be considered when planning future NDS data collections and/or analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Safety Research","volume":"92 ","pages":"Pages 346-374"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Safety Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022437524002032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:

Naturalistic driving studies (NDS) have great potential to characterize the road infrastructure factors influencing everyday driving. A systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the objectives, data processing, and analyses in best-practice applications of NDS data to road infrastructure. Method: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines, a systematic search of seven databases was conducted on 27 June 2023 (PROSPERO CRD42023434948). Fifty-three English-language, peer-reviewed studies were analyzed on the basis of the primary infrastructure category reflected in the research aims. Results: Studies described curves (14), turns at intersections (8), intersections (6), multi-modal treatments (6), ramps (4), work zones (4), charging (2), and other factors (9). Each study was assessed for the risk of methodological bias using amended National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute templates for Quality Assurance. 74% of studies were assessed to be of ’Good’ quality, 13% of ‘Fair’ quality, and 13% of ‘Poor’ quality. Road infrastructure was characterized by external video (38%) complemented by non-NDS sources including satellite imagery (21%) and government data (19%). Data preparation was required in 91% of studies to extract meaningful variables (e.g. manual video coding) and/or link multiple datasets. Analysis predominantly determined correlations between aspects of driver behavior (speed, trajectory, etc.) and infrastructure factors (geometry, lane configuration, etc.). Conclusions: The methods employed were broadly applicable, but required considerable subject-specific adaptation for non-NDS datasets and/or time-consuming video coding. The incorporation of road infrastructure factors in NDS research can continue to be improved by reducing the computational cost of sample processing.Practical Applications: Encouraged by the adaptability of the identified methods, NDS research has the potential to benefit from the consideration of road infrastructure factors in a Safe System context. The analytical requirements for all components of the Safe System should be considered when planning future NDS data collections and/or analysis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
174
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Safety Research is an interdisciplinary publication that provides for the exchange of ideas and scientific evidence capturing studies through research in all areas of safety and health, including traffic, workplace, home, and community. This forum invites research using rigorous methodologies, encourages translational research, and engages the global scientific community through various partnerships (e.g., this outreach includes highlighting some of the latest findings from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention).
期刊最新文献
A pipeline to enhance animal vehicle collision analysis in crash report dataset Caregiver beliefs about older adult falls from a nationally representative U.S. sample 2022 Examining the influence of national culture on aviation safety: A systematic review Effectiveness of training in reducing accidents in construction companies E-scooter safety under scrutiny: Examining crash patterns and injuries in the UK
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1