Optimal placement and upgrade of solar PV integration in a grid-connected solar photovoltaic system

Edward Dodzi Amekah , Emmanuel Wendsongre Ramde , David Ato Quansah , Elvis Twumasi , Stefanie Meilinger , Thorsten Schneiders
{"title":"Optimal placement and upgrade of solar PV integration in a grid-connected solar photovoltaic system","authors":"Edward Dodzi Amekah ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Wendsongre Ramde ,&nbsp;David Ato Quansah ,&nbsp;Elvis Twumasi ,&nbsp;Stefanie Meilinger ,&nbsp;Thorsten Schneiders","doi":"10.1016/j.solcom.2024.100099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The shift towards renewable energy sources has heightened the interest in solar photovoltaic (SPV) systems, particularly in grid-connected configurations, to enhance energy security and reduce carbon emissions. Grid-tied SPVs face power quality challenges when specific grid codes are compromised. This study investigates and upgrades an integrated 90 kWp solar plant within a distribution network, leveraging data from Ghana's Energy Self-Sufficiency for Health Facilities (EnerSHelF) project. The research explores four scenarios for SPV placement optimization using dynamic programming and the Conditional New Adaptive Foraging Tree Squirrel Search Algorithm (CNAFTSSA). A Python-based simulation identifies three scenarios, high load nodes, voltage drop nodes, and system loss nodes, as the points for placing PV for better performance. The analysis revealed 85 %, 82.88 %, and 100 % optimal SPV penetration levels for placing the SPV at high load, voltage drop, and loss nodes. System active power losses were reduced by 72.97 %, 71.52 %, and 70.15 %, and reactive power losses by 73.12 %, 71.86 %, and 68.11 %, respectively, by placing the SPV at the above three categories of nodes. The fourth scenario applies to CNAFTSSA, achieving 100 % SPV penetration and reducing active and reactive power losses by 72.33 % and 72.55 %, respectively. This approach optimizes the voltage regulation (VR) from 24.92 % to 4.16 %, outperforming the VR of PV placement at high load nodes, voltage drop nodes, and loss nodes, where the voltage regulations are 5.25 %, 9.36 %, and 9.64 %, respectively. The novel CNAFTSSA for optimal SPV placement demonstrates its effectiveness in achieving higher penetration levels and improving system losses and VR. The findings highlight the effectiveness of strategic SPV placement and offer a comprehensive methodology that can be adapted for similar power distribution systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101173,"journal":{"name":"Solar Compass","volume":"12 ","pages":"Article 100099"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S277294002400033X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The shift towards renewable energy sources has heightened the interest in solar photovoltaic (SPV) systems, particularly in grid-connected configurations, to enhance energy security and reduce carbon emissions. Grid-tied SPVs face power quality challenges when specific grid codes are compromised. This study investigates and upgrades an integrated 90 kWp solar plant within a distribution network, leveraging data from Ghana's Energy Self-Sufficiency for Health Facilities (EnerSHelF) project. The research explores four scenarios for SPV placement optimization using dynamic programming and the Conditional New Adaptive Foraging Tree Squirrel Search Algorithm (CNAFTSSA). A Python-based simulation identifies three scenarios, high load nodes, voltage drop nodes, and system loss nodes, as the points for placing PV for better performance. The analysis revealed 85 %, 82.88 %, and 100 % optimal SPV penetration levels for placing the SPV at high load, voltage drop, and loss nodes. System active power losses were reduced by 72.97 %, 71.52 %, and 70.15 %, and reactive power losses by 73.12 %, 71.86 %, and 68.11 %, respectively, by placing the SPV at the above three categories of nodes. The fourth scenario applies to CNAFTSSA, achieving 100 % SPV penetration and reducing active and reactive power losses by 72.33 % and 72.55 %, respectively. This approach optimizes the voltage regulation (VR) from 24.92 % to 4.16 %, outperforming the VR of PV placement at high load nodes, voltage drop nodes, and loss nodes, where the voltage regulations are 5.25 %, 9.36 %, and 9.64 %, respectively. The novel CNAFTSSA for optimal SPV placement demonstrates its effectiveness in achieving higher penetration levels and improving system losses and VR. The findings highlight the effectiveness of strategic SPV placement and offer a comprehensive methodology that can be adapted for similar power distribution systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并网太阳能光伏系统中太阳能光伏集成的优化配置与升级
向可再生能源的转变提高了人们对太阳能光伏(SPV)系统的兴趣,特别是在并网配置中,以加强能源安全和减少碳排放。当特定的电网代码被破坏时,并网spv面临电能质量挑战。本研究利用加纳卫生设施能源自给(EnerSHelF)项目的数据,调查并升级了一个配电网络内的集成90千瓦时太阳能发电厂。研究了基于动态规划和条件新自适应觅食树松鼠搜索算法(CNAFTSSA)的四种SPV布局优化方案。基于python的模拟确定了三种场景,即高负载节点、电压下降节点和系统损耗节点,作为放置PV以获得更好性能的点。分析显示,在高负载、电压降和损耗节点放置SPV时,最佳SPV穿透水平分别为85%、82.88%和100%。将SPV置于上述三类节点上,系统有功损耗分别降低72.97%、71.52%和70.15%,无功损耗分别降低73.12%、71.86%和68.11%。第四种方案适用于CNAFTSSA,实现了100%的SPV穿透,将有功和无功功率损耗分别降低了72.33%和72.55%。该方法将电压调节率从24.92%优化到4.16%,优于高负荷节点、电压降节点和损耗节点的电压调节率(分别为5.25%、9.36%和9.64%)。新型CNAFTSSA用于优化SPV位置,证明了其在实现更高穿透水平和改善系统损耗和VR方面的有效性。研究结果强调了战略性SPV安置的有效性,并提供了一种可以适用于类似配电系统的综合方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Towards hybrid grid-connected solar power plants: A case study of IAUN Science and Technology Park in Iran A multi-objective optimization framework for enhancing the resilience and self-sufficiency of photovoltaic systems in smart cities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1