Inferring apparent Newtonian viscosities of liquefied soils from physical models – Analysis using computational fluid dynamics

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109170
Soham Banerjee , Yves Dubief , Mandar Dewoolkar , Jiarui Chen , Scott Olson
{"title":"Inferring apparent Newtonian viscosities of liquefied soils from physical models – Analysis using computational fluid dynamics","authors":"Soham Banerjee ,&nbsp;Yves Dubief ,&nbsp;Mandar Dewoolkar ,&nbsp;Jiarui Chen ,&nbsp;Scott Olson","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The behavior of liquefied soil can be simply portrayed as a viscous fluid through a single parameter viscosity. Physical modeling has often been used to estimate apparent Newtonian viscosities of liquefied soils. In these experiments, objects (e.g., spheres, cylinders, plates) are dragged through liquefied soils and the measured drag forces are analyzed using analytical, closed form solutions to determine the apparent Newtonian viscosities of the liquefied soils considered to behave as Newtonian fluid. This paper presents computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based 2D and 3D analyses of some typical 1g and centrifuge physical models found in the literature that included dragged 3D objects (cylinder, plate, and sphere) through liquefied soils. The simulations revealed that the apparent Newtonian viscosity predicted through 3D CFD analysis simulating a sphere dragged through liquefied soil matched well with that predicted using the Stokes analytical solution, as both the CFD and analytical solution captured the 3D nature of the fluid flow around the sphere. However, the apparent Newtonian viscosities based on 2D analytical solutions applied to physical modeling results of a cylinder and a plate were found to be three to five times greater than those when 3D effects were considered in the 3D CFD simulations. The analyses showed that applying 2D assumption to 3D flow of liquefied soils could lead to unconservative estimates of apparent Newtonian viscosities as the true 3D nature of the flow of liquefied soil is not adequately captured in 2D solutions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 109170"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S026772612400722X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The behavior of liquefied soil can be simply portrayed as a viscous fluid through a single parameter viscosity. Physical modeling has often been used to estimate apparent Newtonian viscosities of liquefied soils. In these experiments, objects (e.g., spheres, cylinders, plates) are dragged through liquefied soils and the measured drag forces are analyzed using analytical, closed form solutions to determine the apparent Newtonian viscosities of the liquefied soils considered to behave as Newtonian fluid. This paper presents computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based 2D and 3D analyses of some typical 1g and centrifuge physical models found in the literature that included dragged 3D objects (cylinder, plate, and sphere) through liquefied soils. The simulations revealed that the apparent Newtonian viscosity predicted through 3D CFD analysis simulating a sphere dragged through liquefied soil matched well with that predicted using the Stokes analytical solution, as both the CFD and analytical solution captured the 3D nature of the fluid flow around the sphere. However, the apparent Newtonian viscosities based on 2D analytical solutions applied to physical modeling results of a cylinder and a plate were found to be three to five times greater than those when 3D effects were considered in the 3D CFD simulations. The analyses showed that applying 2D assumption to 3D flow of liquefied soils could lead to unconservative estimates of apparent Newtonian viscosities as the true 3D nature of the flow of liquefied soil is not adequately captured in 2D solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
期刊最新文献
Cyclic test and numerical analysis of an innovative re-centering SMA cable-wrapped wedge friction damper The influence of forward-directivity pulse-like ground motion orientation angles on structural collapse capacity Nonlinear stiffened inertial amplifier tuned mass friction dampers Effect of static shear stress on cyclic behaviors of medium-dense sand under multi-directional cyclic simple shear loading Ground-motion generations using Multi-label Conditional Embedding–conditional Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Model (ML–cDDPM)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1