Seismic fragility assessment of UHPC ribbed arch bridges

IF 4.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-31 DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109199
Banfu Yan , Junjiang Lai , Suiwen Wu , Shipeng Feng , Xiangcheng Meng
{"title":"Seismic fragility assessment of UHPC ribbed arch bridges","authors":"Banfu Yan ,&nbsp;Junjiang Lai ,&nbsp;Suiwen Wu ,&nbsp;Shipeng Feng ,&nbsp;Xiangcheng Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.soildyn.2024.109199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>It is known that different types of bridge structures exhibit significant variations in the selection of ground motion IMs due to differences in their dynamic characteristics. Additionally, the dynamic characteristics of UHPC ribbed arch bridges differ from those of conventional bridge structures. Conclusions about the seismic fragility of conventional bridge structures derived from previous studies may not be applicable to this specific bridge. In this paper, seismic fragility of UHPC ribbed arch bridges is assessed through the Incremental Dynamic Analysis Method (IDA). For this purpose, an 85m UHPC ribbed arch bridge is selected as the engineering background. The 3-D finite element model of the bridge was established using OpenSees. Subsequently, 12 far-field and 12 near-field ground motion records were selected for nonlinear time-history analysis of the structure. Damage indexes for the arch ribs and tie beams were defined according to the seismic response characteristics of bridge, with the sectional curvature of five locations within these components serving as engineering demand parameters (EDPs). These EDPs were subjected to logarithmic regression analysis with respect to 8 ground motion intensity measures (IMs), aiming to evaluate the efficiency, practicability and proficiency of each IM, and to identify the optimal ground motion IM for this type of bridge. Finally, fragility curves for the arch ribs and tie beams were developed based on the fragility method, pinpointing the seismic vulnerable components of the bridge and assessing the overall seismic performance of the structure. The results indicate that the spectral acceleration at the fundamental period of the structure SAT1 is the optimal IM for fragility analysis of this bridge, followed by the effective peak acceleration EPA and acceleration-based IMs. In addition, under transverse ground motion excitations, the most vulnerable component of the bridge is found to be the E-type tie beam, followed by the springing position of the exterior arch rib. Within the given range of ground motion intensity, the bridge damage will be concentrated on non-structural components (tie beams and bridge deck). The results can provide the guidance for the seismic vulnerability assessment of UHPC ribbed arch bridges.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49502,"journal":{"name":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 109199"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0267726124007516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is known that different types of bridge structures exhibit significant variations in the selection of ground motion IMs due to differences in their dynamic characteristics. Additionally, the dynamic characteristics of UHPC ribbed arch bridges differ from those of conventional bridge structures. Conclusions about the seismic fragility of conventional bridge structures derived from previous studies may not be applicable to this specific bridge. In this paper, seismic fragility of UHPC ribbed arch bridges is assessed through the Incremental Dynamic Analysis Method (IDA). For this purpose, an 85m UHPC ribbed arch bridge is selected as the engineering background. The 3-D finite element model of the bridge was established using OpenSees. Subsequently, 12 far-field and 12 near-field ground motion records were selected for nonlinear time-history analysis of the structure. Damage indexes for the arch ribs and tie beams were defined according to the seismic response characteristics of bridge, with the sectional curvature of five locations within these components serving as engineering demand parameters (EDPs). These EDPs were subjected to logarithmic regression analysis with respect to 8 ground motion intensity measures (IMs), aiming to evaluate the efficiency, practicability and proficiency of each IM, and to identify the optimal ground motion IM for this type of bridge. Finally, fragility curves for the arch ribs and tie beams were developed based on the fragility method, pinpointing the seismic vulnerable components of the bridge and assessing the overall seismic performance of the structure. The results indicate that the spectral acceleration at the fundamental period of the structure SAT1 is the optimal IM for fragility analysis of this bridge, followed by the effective peak acceleration EPA and acceleration-based IMs. In addition, under transverse ground motion excitations, the most vulnerable component of the bridge is found to be the E-type tie beam, followed by the springing position of the exterior arch rib. Within the given range of ground motion intensity, the bridge damage will be concentrated on non-structural components (tie beams and bridge deck). The results can provide the guidance for the seismic vulnerability assessment of UHPC ribbed arch bridges.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
UHPC肋拱桥地震易损性评价
众所周知,不同类型的桥梁结构由于其动力特性的差异,在地震动模量的选择上表现出显著的差异。此外,超高性能混凝土肋拱桥的动力特性也不同于传统桥梁结构。以往研究得出的传统桥梁结构的地震易损性结论可能不适用于该桥。本文采用增量动力分析方法(IDA)对超高性能混凝土肋拱桥的地震易损性进行了评价。为此,选取一座85m的UHPC肋拱桥作为工程背景。采用OpenSees软件建立桥梁三维有限元模型。随后,选取12条远场和12条近场地震动记录对结构进行非线性时程分析。根据桥梁的地震反应特征,确定了拱肋和系梁的损伤指标,并以拱肋和系梁内5个位置的截面曲率作为工程需求参数。对这些edp进行了8种地震动强度测量(IMs)的对数回归分析,旨在评估每种IM的效率、实用性和熟练程度,并确定该类型桥梁的最佳地震动强度测量。最后,基于易损性方法建立了拱肋和系梁的易损性曲线,精确定位了桥梁的地震易损性构件,并对结构的整体抗震性能进行了评估。结果表明,结构基本期谱加速度SAT1是该桥梁易损性分析的最优IM,其次是有效峰值加速度EPA和基于加速度的IM。此外,在横向地震动激励下,发现桥梁最脆弱的构件是e型系梁,其次是外拱肋的弹跳位置。在给定的地震动强度范围内,桥梁的损伤将集中在非结构构件(系梁和桥面)上。研究结果可为UHPC肋拱桥的地震易损性评价提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering
Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
15.00%
发文量
446
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The journal aims to encourage and enhance the role of mechanics and other disciplines as they relate to earthquake engineering by providing opportunities for the publication of the work of applied mathematicians, engineers and other applied scientists involved in solving problems closely related to the field of earthquake engineering and geotechnical earthquake engineering. Emphasis is placed on new concepts and techniques, but case histories will also be published if they enhance the presentation and understanding of new technical concepts.
期刊最新文献
The influence of seismic source heterogeneity and local site effects on intensity attenuation during Chilean megathrust earthquakes Reflection characteristics of P1 and S1 waves at the free boundary of saturated frozen soil considering thermal effects Response of model pile-supported bridge to near-fault pulse-type ground motions A comprehensive analysis of the dynamic properties and microscopic mechanisms of natural fiber-reinforced soil Experimental and numerical studies on seismic performance of damaged RC bridge columns repaired using different jacketing materials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1