George Amenchwi Amahnui, Marth Vanegas, Louis Verchot, Augusto Castro-Nunez
{"title":"Achieving the paris agreement goals by transitioning to low-emissions food systems: A comprehensive review of countries’ actions","authors":"George Amenchwi Amahnui, Marth Vanegas, Louis Verchot, Augusto Castro-Nunez","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Meeting the 1.5°C Paris Agreement target requires ambitious strategies to transition to low-emissions food systems. This study aimed to identify strategies for reducing food-system greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), including their co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities for implementation applied by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Annex I and non-Annex I countries. The study was based on a systematic Scopus database literature review of peer-reviewed papers. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse) methodology was used to identify, assess, and select 201 articles related to our research questions. We analyzed data by identifying GHGE-reduction strategies reported for four food-system levels (pre-production, production, supply chain, and consumption) across Annex I and non-Annex I countries. Our findings show that 65 % of the articles published results for Annex I, 19 % for non-Annex I, and 16 % for both Annex I and non-Annex I countries, indicating that food-system GHGE-reduction has gained more attention in Annex I than in non-annex I countries. Among the 94 GHGE-reduction strategies identified applicable to the four food-system levels, dietary changes, such as reducing red meat consumption and restricting 'forest-risk' agricultural commodities were the most reported, particularly in the Global North. The supply-chain level reported the highest number of GHGE-reduction strategies (38), while the pre-production level recorded the lowest (2). The co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities associated with the GHGE-reduction measures presented were underreported. We conclude that, with increased economic growth, increasing urban populations, and a rising middle class in non-Annex I countries, Annex I GHGE-reduction strategies could also be promoted in non-annex I countries across the Global South or serve as a springboard for those countries that have yet to apply a food-system GHGE-reduction approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 103968"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124003022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Meeting the 1.5°C Paris Agreement target requires ambitious strategies to transition to low-emissions food systems. This study aimed to identify strategies for reducing food-system greenhouse gas emissions (GHGEs), including their co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities for implementation applied by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Annex I and non-Annex I countries. The study was based on a systematic Scopus database literature review of peer-reviewed papers. PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyse) methodology was used to identify, assess, and select 201 articles related to our research questions. We analyzed data by identifying GHGE-reduction strategies reported for four food-system levels (pre-production, production, supply chain, and consumption) across Annex I and non-Annex I countries. Our findings show that 65 % of the articles published results for Annex I, 19 % for non-Annex I, and 16 % for both Annex I and non-Annex I countries, indicating that food-system GHGE-reduction has gained more attention in Annex I than in non-annex I countries. Among the 94 GHGE-reduction strategies identified applicable to the four food-system levels, dietary changes, such as reducing red meat consumption and restricting 'forest-risk' agricultural commodities were the most reported, particularly in the Global North. The supply-chain level reported the highest number of GHGE-reduction strategies (38), while the pre-production level recorded the lowest (2). The co-benefits, tradeoffs, challenges, and opportunities associated with the GHGE-reduction measures presented were underreported. We conclude that, with increased economic growth, increasing urban populations, and a rising middle class in non-Annex I countries, Annex I GHGE-reduction strategies could also be promoted in non-annex I countries across the Global South or serve as a springboard for those countries that have yet to apply a food-system GHGE-reduction approach.
要实现《巴黎协定》的1.5°C温控目标,需要采取雄心勃勃的战略,向低排放粮食体系过渡。本研究旨在确定减少粮食系统温室气体排放(GHGEs)的战略,包括《联合国气候变化框架公约》(UNFCCC)附件一和非附件一国家实施的共同利益、权衡、挑战和机遇。该研究基于对同行评议论文的系统性Scopus数据库文献综述。PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and meta - analysis)方法用于识别、评估和选择201篇与我们的研究问题相关的文章。我们通过确定附件一和非附件一国家在四个粮食系统层面(生产前、生产、供应链和消费)报告的温室气体减排战略来分析数据。我们的研究结果表明,在已发表的文章中,附件一的结果为65% %,非附件一的结果为19% %,附件一和非附件一国家的结果均为16% %,这表明附件一国家比非附件一国家更重视粮食系统温室气体减排。在确定的适用于四个粮食系统水平的94项温室气体减排战略中,报告最多的是饮食变化,例如减少红肉消费和限制“森林风险”农产品,特别是在全球北方。供应链层面报告的温室气体减排策略数量最多(38个),而生产前层面记录的温室气体减排策略数量最少(2个)。与温室气体减排措施相关的共同利益、权衡、挑战和机遇被低估了。我们的结论是,随着非附件一国家的经济增长、城市人口增加和中产阶级的崛起,附件一温室气体减排战略也可以在全球南方的非附件一国家得到推广,或者作为那些尚未采用粮食系统温室气体减排方法的国家的跳板。
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.