Knowledge brokers at the interface of environmental science and policy: A review of knowledge and research needs

IF 5.2 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103973
C. Cvitanovic , DB Karcher , J. Breen , N. Badullovich , P. Cairney , R. Dalla Pozza , J. Duggan , S. Hoffmann , R. Kelly , AM Meadow , S. Posner
{"title":"Knowledge brokers at the interface of environmental science and policy: A review of knowledge and research needs","authors":"C. Cvitanovic ,&nbsp;DB Karcher ,&nbsp;J. Breen ,&nbsp;N. Badullovich ,&nbsp;P. Cairney ,&nbsp;R. Dalla Pozza ,&nbsp;J. Duggan ,&nbsp;S. Hoffmann ,&nbsp;R. Kelly ,&nbsp;AM Meadow ,&nbsp;S. Posner","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The largely negative impacts of human activities on social-ecological systems are becoming increasingly apparent. Efforts to address these impacts require effective knowledge exchange among researchers and decision-makers to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making processes. Despite this, however, examples of achieving effective knowledge exchange in practice are few. One solution to reducing barriers to knowledge exchange and building capacity for evidence-informed decision-making is through the use of knowledge brokers. Recognition of the role and value of knowledge brokers is becoming increasingly common in the environmental sector, but there are important gaps in understanding the divergent practices of knowledge brokers working to inform solutions to environmental challenges that hinder their successful implementation. To this end, we undertake a systematic map of the peer-reviewed and grey literature on knowledge brokering at the interface of environmental science and policy. We find that traditional conceptualisations of knowledge brokers are insufficient for capturing the true diversity of practices and identities that knowledge brokers can take. Instead, we show that within the environment sector, knowledge brokers, and the work they do, can take a variety of forms that are influenced by (among other things) the processes through which brokering roles were created, their mission, their budgets, and the contexts in which they work. In doing so, we also emphasize the ‘invisible’ work that knowledge brokers do, seeking to bring to the fore the range of activities that are central to supporting knowledge exchange, but often go unnoticed and are almost impossible to quantify. Drawing on our results and our collective knowledge, we outline a research agenda that articulates the most critical remaining knowledge gaps relating to knowledge brokering. Bringing these together, a core goal of this paper is to support and serve a growing global community of practice (both in theory and application) on knowledge brokering at the interface of environmental science and policy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":"163 ","pages":"Article 103973"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124003071","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The largely negative impacts of human activities on social-ecological systems are becoming increasingly apparent. Efforts to address these impacts require effective knowledge exchange among researchers and decision-makers to facilitate evidence-informed decision-making processes. Despite this, however, examples of achieving effective knowledge exchange in practice are few. One solution to reducing barriers to knowledge exchange and building capacity for evidence-informed decision-making is through the use of knowledge brokers. Recognition of the role and value of knowledge brokers is becoming increasingly common in the environmental sector, but there are important gaps in understanding the divergent practices of knowledge brokers working to inform solutions to environmental challenges that hinder their successful implementation. To this end, we undertake a systematic map of the peer-reviewed and grey literature on knowledge brokering at the interface of environmental science and policy. We find that traditional conceptualisations of knowledge brokers are insufficient for capturing the true diversity of practices and identities that knowledge brokers can take. Instead, we show that within the environment sector, knowledge brokers, and the work they do, can take a variety of forms that are influenced by (among other things) the processes through which brokering roles were created, their mission, their budgets, and the contexts in which they work. In doing so, we also emphasize the ‘invisible’ work that knowledge brokers do, seeking to bring to the fore the range of activities that are central to supporting knowledge exchange, but often go unnoticed and are almost impossible to quantify. Drawing on our results and our collective knowledge, we outline a research agenda that articulates the most critical remaining knowledge gaps relating to knowledge brokering. Bringing these together, a core goal of this paper is to support and serve a growing global community of practice (both in theory and application) on knowledge brokering at the interface of environmental science and policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
环境科学与政策交界处的知识掮客:知识与研究需求综述
人类活动对社会生态系统的负面影响日益明显。应对这些影响的努力需要研究人员和决策者之间进行有效的知识交流,以促进循证决策过程。然而,尽管如此,在实践中实现有效知识交流的例子很少。减少知识交流障碍和建设循证决策能力的一个解决办法是利用知识经纪人。在环境部门,认识到知识中介的作用和价值正变得越来越普遍,但是在理解知识中介为环境挑战的解决方案提供信息的不同实践方面存在重要差距,这些实践阻碍了知识中介的成功实施。为此,我们对环境科学和政策界面的知识中介进行了同行评审和灰色文献的系统地图。我们发现,传统的知识经纪人概念不足以捕捉知识经纪人可以采取的实践和身份的真正多样性。相反,我们表明,在环境部门,知识经纪人和他们所做的工作可以采取各种形式,这些形式受到(除其他外)中介角色创建的过程、他们的使命、他们的预算和他们工作的背景的影响。在这样做的过程中,我们还强调了知识经纪人所做的“无形”工作,试图突出一系列对支持知识交流至关重要的活动,但这些活动往往不被注意,而且几乎不可能量化。根据我们的成果和我们的集体知识,我们概述了一个研究议程,阐明了与知识中介有关的最关键的剩余知识差距。综上所述,本文的一个核心目标是支持和服务于环境科学和政策之间知识中介的日益增长的全球实践社区(包括理论和应用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Decolonising hydrology: Reflecting on positionalities for sustainable and just futures A subnational social vulnerability index for use in drought decision support systems Tides of tension: Exploring the blue economy through stakeholder narrations Bridging waters and power: Hydrosocial territories with socio-natural resilience in China's Great Yangtze River protection programme The Global Framework for Climate Services: An ‘imaginary’ of climate services shaping practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1